Literature DB >> 27726000

Cost-effectiveness of combined oral bisphosphonate therapy and falls prevention exercise for fracture prevention in the USA.

T Mori1,2,3, C J Crandall4, D A Ganz5,6,7.   

Abstract

We developed a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling US white women without prior major osteoporotic fractures over a lifetime horizon. At ages 75 and 80, adding 1 year of exercise to 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy is cost-effective at a conventionally accepted threshold compared with bisphosphonates alone.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the combined strategy of oral bisphosphonate therapy for 5 years and falls prevention exercise for 1 year compared with either strategy in isolation.
METHODS: We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICERs] (2014 US dollars per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]), using a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling US white women with different starting ages (65, 70, 75, and 80) without prior history of hip, vertebral, or wrist fractures over a lifetime horizon from the societal perspective.
RESULTS: At ages 65, 70, 75, and 80, the combined strategy had ICERs of $202,020, $118,460, $46,870, and $17,640 per QALY, respectively, compared with oral bisphosphonate therapy alone. The combined strategy provided better health at lower cost than falls prevention exercise alone at ages 70, 75, and 80. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, results were particularly sensitive to the change in the opportunity cost of participants' time spent exercising. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of the combined strategy being cost-effective compared with the next best alternative increased with age, ranging from 35 % at age 65 to 48 % at age 80 at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Among community-dwelling US white women ages 75 and 80, adding 1 year of exercise to 5 years of oral bisphosphonate therapy is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY, compared with oral bisphosphonate therapy only. This analysis will help clinicians and policymakers make better decisions about treatment options to reduce fracture risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness analysis; Falls prevention exercise; Fracture prevention; Oral bisphosphonate therapy; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27726000     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3772-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  36 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Cost-effectiveness of oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis at different ages and levels of life expectancy.

Authors:  Annalise N Pham; Santanu K Datta; Thomas J Weber; Louise C Walter; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated meta-analysis and best practice recommendations.

Authors:  Catherine Sherrington; Anne Tiedemann; Nicola Fairhall; Jacqueline C T Close; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  N S W Public Health Bull       Date:  2011-06

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life for osteoporosis-related conditions.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; B de Graaff; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Jay Magaziner; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Dirk Vanderschueren; Koen Milisen; Brigitte Velkeniers; Steven Boonen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The components of excess mortality after hip fracture.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; B Jonsson; A K Oglesby
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cynthia L Leibson; Anna N A Tosteson; Sherine E Gabriel; Jeanine E Ransom; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B Dawson-Hughes; A R Pressman; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.

Authors:  T Mori; C J Crandall; D A Ganz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Sustainable affordability of Otago exercise in the US healthcare system: response to Liu et al.

Authors:  T Mori; C J Crandall; D A Ganz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Sustainable affordability of Otago exercise in the US healthcare system.

Authors:  X Liu; A H Villamagna; J W Yoo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models.

Authors:  Joseph Kwon; Hazel Squires; Matthew Franklin; Tracey Young
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Systematic review of unintentional injury prevention economic evaluations 2010-2019 and comparison to 1998-2009.

Authors:  Mallika Mahalingam; Cora Peterson; Gwen Bergen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 6.  Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal.

Authors:  Md Azharuddin; Mohammad Adil; Rashid Ali Khan; Pinaki Ghosh; Prem Kapur; Manju Sharma
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid Versus Oral Alendronate for Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women in China.

Authors:  Ruxu You; Yu Zhang; David Bin-Chia Wu; Jinyu Liu; Xinyu Qian; Nan Luo; Takahiro Mori
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Sequential Teriparatide/Alendronate Versus Alendronate-Alone Strategies in High-Risk Osteoporotic Women in the US: Analyzing the Impact of Generic/Biosimilar Teriparatide.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Carolyn J Crandall; David A Ganz
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-11-13

9.  Cost-effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention intervention for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Andrea Singer; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 7.538

10.  Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate for older osteoporotic women in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Carolyn J Crandall; Tomoko Fujii; David A Ganz
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.