| Literature DB >> 27725730 |
Jing Xu1, Yanhua Chen1, Ruiping Zhang1, Jiuming He1, Yongmei Song2, Jingbo Wang3, Huiqing Wang1, Luhua Wang3, Qimin Zhan2, Zeper Abliz1,4.
Abstract
We performed a metabolomics study using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) combined with multivariate data analysis (MVDA) to discriminate global urine profiles in urine samples from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and healthy controls (NC). Our work evaluated the feasibility of employing urine metabolomics for the diagnosis and staging of ESCC. The satisfactory classification between the healthy controls and ESCC patients was obtained using the MVDA model, and obvious classification of early-stage and advanced-stage patients was also observed. The results suggest that the combination of LC-MS analysis and MVDA may have potential applications for ESCC diagnosis and staging. We then conducted LC-MS/MS experiments to identify the potential biomarkers with large contributions to the discrimination. A total of 83 potential diagnostic biomarkers for ESCC were screened out, and 19 potential biomarkers were identified; the variations between the differences in staging using these potential biomarkers were further analyzed. These biomarkers may not be unique to ESCCs, but instead result from any malignant disease. To further elucidate the pathophysiology of ESCC, we studied related metabolic pathways and found that ESCC is associated with perturbations of fatty acid β-oxidation and the metabolism of amino acids, purines, and pyrimidines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27725730 PMCID: PMC5057114 DOI: 10.1038/srep35010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Retention times of mixed standards peaks detected by LC-MS.
| Compounds | LC-(+)ESI-MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rt (min) | RSD (%) | Peak Area (×105) | RSD (%) | |
| L-Carnitine | 1.4 | 0.86 | 9.788 | 5.01 |
| Phenylalanine | 2.9 | 0.16 | 6.415 | 2.44 |
| Hippuric acid | 8.2 | 1.50 | 3.170 | 2.56 |
| Hydrocortisone | 15.0 | 0.51 | 18.375 | 4.20 |
| Estrone | 17.4 | 0.2 | 0.317 | 11.14 |
| Phenylalanine | 2.9 | 1.22 | 1.569 | 4.33 |
| Hippuric acid | 7.5 | 2.56 | 5.916 | 3.47 |
| Tryptophan | 5.1 | 0.86 | 1.674 | 4.02 |
| Cholic acid | 13.5 | 0.52 | 1.406 | 10.35 |
| Linoleic acid | 20.9 | 0.38 | 8.785 | 5.26 |
Figure 1Score plots of OPLS-DA models (A,B); Validation plots of the PLS-DA models (C,D) and T-predicted scatter plots (E,F) of OPLS-DA model based on the data from LC-(+)ESI-MS (A,C,E) and LC-(−)ESI-MS (B,D,F). (, ESCC patients; , controls; , ESCC patient prediction set; and , control prediction set).
Figure 2OPLS-DA score plots based on the data from (A,C) LC-(+)ESI-MS and (B,D) LC-(−)ESI-MS of ESCC patients and healthy controls. , early-stage ESCC patients (T1–2); , advanced-stage ESCC patients (T3–4); and , controls.
Urine potential biomarkers associated with ESCC.
| No. | RT(min) | metabolite identification | VIPd | trende | related pathway | The identification scoref | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.43 | 130.0501 | Pyroglutamic acidb | 3.65E-06 | 6.59 | ↑ | Glutamine metabolism | 6 |
| 2 | 7.45 | 134.0591 | Indoxylb | 0.006 | 1.52 | ↑ | Tryptophan metabolism | 6 |
| 3 | 2.27 | 139.0507 | Urocanic acida,b | 0.017 | 1.53 | ↑ | Histidine metabolism | 8 |
| 4 | 1.45 | 162.1097 | L-Carnitinea,b | 0.021 | 2.79 | ↑ | Fatty acid transportation | 8 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 165.0554 | L-Fucosea,b | 0.003 | 1.88 | ↑ | Fructose and mannose degradation | 8 |
| 6 | 2.89 | 169.0378 | Uric acida,b | 4.89E-05 | 7.12 | ↑ | Purine metabolism | 8 |
| 7 | 9.56 | 181.0719 | Paraxanthineb | 0.012 | 2.31 | ↓ | Caffeine metabolism | 6 |
| 8 | 2.07 | 204.1249 | Acetylcarnitineb | 0.025 | 6.65 | ↑ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 6 |
| 9 | 3.41 | 228.0801 | Deoxycytidinea,b | 2.51E-09 | 4.36 | ↑ | Pyrimidine metabolism | 8 |
| 10 | 9.43 | 265.1169 | Phenylacetylglutaminea,b | 7.8E-07 | 12.91 | ↑ | Phenylalanine metabolism | 8 |
| 11 | 11.93 | 274.2009 | Heptanoylcarnitine (carnitine C 7:0)b | 0.031 | 1.69 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 6 |
| 12 | 12.3 | 286.2005 | Octenoylcarnitine (carnitine C 8:1) | 0.008 | 2.13 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 4 |
| 13 | 13.39 | 300.2163 | Nonenoylcarnitine (carnitine C 9:1) | 0.025 | 1.39 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 4 |
| 14 | 14.03 | 302.2319 | Nonanoylcarnitine (carnitine C 9:0)b | 0.0025 | 3.39 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 6 |
| 15 | 14.92 | 316.2472 | Decanoylcarnitine (carnitine C 10:0)a,b | 0.012 | 1.36 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 8 |
| 16 | 15.14 | 328.2473 | Undecenoylcarnitine (carnitine C 11:1) | 0.019 | 1.78 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 4 |
| 17 | 5.08 | 330.0588 | cAMPa,b | 0.016 | 2.15 | ↑ | Purine metabolism | 8 |
| 18 | 11.70 | 330.2650 | Undecanoylcarnitine (carnitine C 11:0)b | 0.019 | 1.45 | ↓ | Fatty acid β oxidation | 6 |
| 19 | 4.94 | 346.0547 | cGMPa,b | 2E-14 | 3.17 | ↑ | Purine metabolism | 8 |
aMetabolites confirmed by standard compounds. bMetabolites provisionally identified by database searches and MS fragmentation. Others, proposals based on MS fragmentation and exact mass data. cP value of independent t-test. dVIP is variable importance in the projection obtained from OPLS-DA with a threshold of 1.0. eChange trend compared with controls. (↑): up-regulated. (↓): down-regulated. fThe identification score is calculated by the scoring metric.
Figure 3Hierarchical Clustering Analysis (HCA) of 19 potential biomarkers.
Figure 4Visualization of the discriminatory power of individual and combined potential diagnostic biomarkers.
Figure 5Typical metabolite variations in urine samples from T1–2 and T3–4 ESCC patients relative to controls.
Clinicopathologic characteristics of the study samples.
| characteristics | ESCC patients | Healthy controls |
|---|---|---|
| No. of subjects | 62 | 62 |
| Age (mean, range) | 62, 46–78 | 60, 45–74 |
| BMI (mean, range) | 22.1, 16.4–30.4 | 21.6, 16.7–29.6 |
| Gender | male | male |
| Race | Chinese | Chinese |
| Cancer stage | ||
| Early stage (T1–2, without metastases) | 22 (T1: 7, T2: 15) | |
| Advanced stage (T3–4, with metastases) | 40 (T3: 19, T4: 21) |