PURPOSE: A proportion of newly diagnosed cancer patients may experience anxiety and depression. Emotion suppression has been associated with poorer psychoemotional outcomes, whereas reappraisal may be an adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Few studies have examined potential mechanisms linking reappraisal to psychoemotional outcomes in cancer patients. This study aims to replicate findings on reappraisal and suppression and further examines if hope mediates the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression in patients newly diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: Participants were 144 adult cancer patients (65.3% female, mean age = 48.96 years, SD = 9.23). Patients completed a set of study questionnaires, including the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Adult Hope Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Path analysis was used to examine if hope mediated the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression. RESULTS: Prevalence of anxiety was 39.6% and depression was 25.0%. Reappraisal and hope were correlated with lower anxiety and depression, whereas suppression was correlated with higher anxiety and depression. The hypothesized mediation model provided fit to the data, comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94, root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.05. There was a significant indirect effect of reappraisal on anxiety and depression via hope, b = -0.95, SE = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = -1.77 to -0.12, whereas the direct effect of reappraisal was nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that hope mediated the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression outcomes. Moreover, the high prevalence of anxiety and depression implies a need for healthcare providers to attend to the psychoemotional needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients.
PURPOSE: A proportion of newly diagnosed cancerpatients may experience anxiety and depression. Emotion suppression has been associated with poorer psychoemotional outcomes, whereas reappraisal may be an adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Few studies have examined potential mechanisms linking reappraisal to psychoemotional outcomes in cancerpatients. This study aims to replicate findings on reappraisal and suppression and further examines if hope mediates the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression in patients newly diagnosed with cancer. METHODS:Participants were 144 adult cancerpatients (65.3% female, mean age = 48.96 years, SD = 9.23). Patients completed a set of study questionnaires, including the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Adult Hope Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Path analysis was used to examine if hope mediated the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression. RESULTS: Prevalence of anxiety was 39.6% and depression was 25.0%. Reappraisal and hope were correlated with lower anxiety and depression, whereas suppression was correlated with higher anxiety and depression. The hypothesized mediation model provided fit to the data, comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.94, root-mean-square-error of approximation = 0.05. There was a significant indirect effect of reappraisal on anxiety and depression via hope, b = -0.95, SE = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = -1.77 to -0.12, whereas the direct effect of reappraisal was nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that hope mediated the association between reappraisal and anxiety/depression outcomes. Moreover, the high prevalence of anxiety and depression implies a need for healthcare providers to attend to the psychoemotional needs of newly diagnosed cancerpatients.
Authors: Alessandra Babore; Sonia M Bramanti; Lucia Lombardi; Liborio Stuppia; Carmen Trumello; Ivana Antonucci; Alessandra Cavallo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laurie E Steffen; Jennifer S Cheavens; Kevin E Vowles; Jennifer Gabbard; Huynh Nguyen; Gregory N Gan; Martin J Edelman; Bruce W Smith Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laurie E Steffen; Kevin E Vowles; Bruce W Smith; Gregory N Gan; Martin J Edelman Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Yijun Bao; Lizhuo Li; Yanlei Guan; Yan Liu; Wei Wang; Dan Zhao; Shanwei Tao; Yuhui Ling; Yan Wang; Bo Bi; Anhua Wu; Liu Cao Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amy Y Zhang; Stephen Ganocy; Alex Z Fu; Denise Kresevic; Lee Ponsky; Gerald Strauss; Donald R Bodner; Hui Zhu Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael Kusch; Hildegard Labouvie; Vera Schiewer; Natalie Talalaev; Jan C Cwik; Sonja Bussmann; Lusine Vaganian; Alexander L Gerlach; Antje Dresen; Natalia Cecon; Sandra Salm; Theresia Krieger; Holger Pfaff; Clarissa Lemmen; Lisa Derendorf; Stephanie Stock; Christina Samel; Anna Hagemeier; Martin Hellmich; Bernd Leicher; Gregor Hültenschmidt; Jessica Swoboda; Peter Haas; Anna Arning; Andrea Göttel; Kathrin Schwickerath; Ullrich Graeven; Stefanie Houwaart; Hedy Kerek-Bodden; Steffen Krebs; Christiana Muth; Christina Hecker; Marcel Reiser; Cornelia Mauch; Jennifer Benner; Gerdamarie Schmidt; Christiane Karlowsky; Gisela Vimalanandan; Lukas Matyschik; Lars Galonska; Annette Francke; Karin Osborne; Ursula Nestle; Markus Bäumer; Kordula Schmitz; Jürgen Wolf; Michael Hallek Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Anna Agape Minja; Elysia Larson; Zenaice Aloyce; Ricardo Araya; Anna Kaale; Sylvia F Kaaya; Janeth Kamala; Muhummed Nadeem Kasmani; Amina Komba; Angelina Mwimba; Fileuka Ngakongwa; Hellen Siril; Mary C Smith Fawzi; Magreat Somba; Christopher R Sudfeld; Caleb J Figge Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Xin Zhang; Rong Zou; Xiaoxing Liao; Allan B I Bernardo; Hongfei Du; Zhechen Wang; Yu Cheng; Yulong He Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 4.157