Literature DB >> 27722935

Time to "cool off"? Examining indications for "elective deferred frozen embryo transfer".

Alexander M Quaas1, Karl R Hansen2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27722935      PMCID: PMC5171899          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0815-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Cynthia Hudson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Z Li; Y A Wang; W Ledger; D H Edgar; E A Sullivan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  "Freeze Only"--An Evolving Standard in Clinical In Vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Cynthia Farquhar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Introduction: Evidence-based in vitro fertilization treatment of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: peeling away the layers of the onion.

Authors:  Richard S Legro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Fresh versus frozen: initial transfer or cumulative cycle results: how do we interpret results and design studies?

Authors:  Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Shilpi Pandey; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Karinna Lattes; Sandra Serra; Ivan Solà; Selmo Geber; Ramón Carreras; Miguel Angel Checa
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Chen; Yuhua Shi; Yun Sun; Bo Zhang; Xiaoyan Liang; Yunxia Cao; Jing Yang; Jiayin Liu; Daimin Wei; Ning Weng; Lifeng Tian; Cuifang Hao; Dongzi Yang; Feng Zhou; Juanzi Shi; Yongle Xu; Jing Li; Junhao Yan; Yingying Qin; Han Zhao; Heping Zhang; Richard S Legro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Cindy Farquhar; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cryobiology in human ARTs: then and now.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Triggering change in stimulation protocols: a matter of oocyte maturation and beyond.

Authors:  Alexander M Quaas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Frozen-thawed embryo transfers: time to adopt a more "natural" approach?

Authors:  Bruce D Pier; Logan M Havemann; Alexander M Quaas; Ryan J Heitmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.