| Literature DB >> 27722071 |
Kavita R Pandey1, Chetan Joshi2, Babu V Vakil1.
Abstract
Probiotics are microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer health benefits to the host. A leading pharmaceutical company producing Bacillus coagulans as a probiotic was facing the problem of recurring phage attacks. Two mutants viz. B. co PIII and B. co MIII that were isolated as phage resistant mutants after UV irradiation andEntities:
Keywords: Bacillus coagulans; Evolutionary operation (EVOP); Plackett–Burman methodology; Probiotics; Random mutagenesis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27722071 PMCID: PMC5035293 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3325-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the experimental plan (Walters et al. 1991)
Plackett–Burman design for shake flask optimization
| Runs | Variables | Response (biomass—g/l) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H |
| Mutant B. co PIII | Mutant B. co MIII | ||||
| Act. | Pred. | Act. | Pred. | Act. | Pred. | |||||||||
| 1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 3.58 | 3.585 | 3.89 | 4.293 | 2.89 | 2.843 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 3.57 | 3.862 | 3.03 | 3.535 | 2.21 | 2.243 |
| 3 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2.95 | 3.198 | 3.89 | 4.183 | 2.52 | 2.400 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 2.75 | 2.720 | 2.61 | 3.425 | 2.07 | 2.297 |
| 5 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 4.52 | 4.542 | 4.12 | 4.183 | 2.75 | 2.837 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 2.37 | 2.13 | 2.41 | 2.303 | 2.37 | 2.157 |
| 7 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 5.35 | 5.043 | 5.1 | 4.657 | 3.41 | 3.317 |
| 8 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 4.8 | 4.877 | 4.91 | 4.657 | 3.23 | 3.257 |
| 9 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 6.12 | 6.110 | 5.89 | 5.415 | 4.48 | 4.353 |
| 10 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 2.67 | 2.882 | 2.82 | 2.303 | 1.64 | 1.660 |
| 11 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 4.23 | 4.173 | 4.03 | 4.293 | 3.57 | 3.777 |
| 12 | −1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 2.98 | 2.772 | 3.61 | 3.062 | 2.32 | 2.320 |
The variable codes and their lower (−1) and higher (+1) values are as follows: A: glucose concentration—10 and 30 g/l, B: C/N ratio—20 and 40, C: agitation—150 and 250 rpm, D: temperature—30 and 40 °C, E: pH—5.5–7.5; F: mineral concentration—1× and 5×, G: inoculum size—5 and 10 % and age of seed—18 and 24 h, Act.: experimental data, Pred.: response predicted by model, responses are average of three values
Calculation worksheet for analysis of effects, standard deviation and error limits for higher productivity
| Effect of variables | Formulae to calculate effects of variables |
|---|---|
| Glucose | 1/6 [X3 + X4 + X5 + X7 + X8 + X9] − [X1 + X2 + X6 + X10 + X11 + X12] |
| C/N | 1/6 [X1 + X3 + X5 + X9 + X11 + X12] − [X2 + X4 + X6 + X7 + X8 + X10] |
| Agitation | 1/6 [X1 + X2 + X7 + X8 + X9 + X11] − [X3 + X4 + X5 + X6 + X10 + X12] |
| Minerals conc. | 1/6 [X4 + X6 + X7 + X9 + X11 + X12] − [X1 + X2 + X3 + X5 + X8 + X10] |
X = response, C/N = carbon–nitrogen ratio
Multiple regression analysis of the data obtained by PB-design
| Cultures | SD (σ) | Adequate precision | p value | Model remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 0.63 | 8.915 | <0.05 | Significant |
| Mutant B.co PIII | 0.54 | 10.037 | ||
| Mutant B.co MIII | 0.43 | 8.779 |
Cycle-I of EVOP with five sets of conditions
| E13 (−1) | E14 (−2) | E15 (0) | E16 (+1) | E17 (+2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conditions | |||||
| Glucose (g/l) | 5 | 6.25 | 7.50 | 8.75 | 10 |
| C/N ratio | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
| Agitation (rpm) | 150 | 175 | 200 | 225 | 250 |
| Responsea (biomass—g/l) | |||||
| Parent | 4.80 | 5.72 | 6.10 | 6.97 | 7.10 |
| Mutant B.co PIII | 4.74 | 5.19 | 5.81 | 5.88 | 5.23 |
| Mutant B.co MIII | 3.79 | 4.02 | 4.79 | 4.38 | 4.25 |
aResponses are average of three values
EVOP designing for the three probiotic cultures and effects of error limits
| Parameters | E18 (−1) | E19 (0) | E20 (+1) | E21 (−1) | E22 (0) | E23 (+1) | E24 (−1) | E25 (0) | E26 (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | |||||||||
| Glucose (g/l) | 53 | 55.8 | 59 | 57 | 59 | 60 | 58 | 59 | 59.5 |
| C/N ratio | 38 | 40 | 42 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 41.5 | 42 | 42.5 |
| Agitation (rpm) | 200 | 225 | 250 | 240 | 250 | 250 | 245 | 250 | 250 |
| Responsea (biomass—g/l) | 7.2 | 7.38 | 7.88 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 7.42 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.2 |
σ—standard deviation
aResponses are average of three values
Optimized shake flask conditions for maximum yields of probiotic strains
| Variables | Optimized shake flask conditions for probiotic strains | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mutant B. co PIII | Mutant B. co MIII | |
| Glucose (g/l) | 59 | 47 | 32.5 |
| C/N ratio | 42 | 36 | 31 |
| Agitation (rpm) | 225 | 250 | 220 |
| Biomassa (g/l) | 7.88 | 6.3 | 6.1 |
aResponses are average of three values
Maximum growth rates obtained on kinetic modelling of the three cultures
| S. no. | Strain | Actual µmax | Predicted µmax | Xm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parental | 0.408 | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| 2 | Mutant MIII | 0.389 | 0.399 | 0.4 |
| 3 | Mutant PIII | 0.396 | 0.40 | 0.4 |
Fig. 2Plots of biomass produced (experimentally) by the 3 probiotic cultures—B. coagulans (parent) (a) and mutants B.co PIII (b) and B.co MIII (c), against the values predicted by model (experiments were run in triplicates)