| Literature DB >> 27722059 |
Gunseli Katirci1, R Banu Ermis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microindentation hardness and chemical composition of residual dentin left at the cavity bottom following removal of carious dentin using the Carisolv chemomechanical and Er:YAG laser caries excavation methods in comparison with the conventional tungsten-carbide bur excavation.Entities:
Keywords: Dental caries; Dental cavity preparation; Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; Er:YAG lasers; Hardness; Scanning electron microscopy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27722059 PMCID: PMC5031566 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3289-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Three caries excavation groups of samples used in the study along with the evaluation methods performed
Distribution of the number and percentages of residual caries for the three excavation methods (n = 40)
| Visual macroscopic evaluation by stereomicroscope | |
|---|---|
| Caries present/caries absent n (%) | |
| Conventional | 2/38 (5/95)b |
| Chemomechanical | 8/32 (20/80)c |
| Er:YAG laser | 2/38 (5/95)b |
Mean values with the same superscript letters are not statistically different in the same column (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U test, p > 0.05)
Knoop hardness (HK) values of remaining dentin tissue after three caries removal methods
| HK (mean ± SD) (n) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Chemomechanical | Er:YAG laser |
| 40.51 ± 5.78a (40) | 33.50 ± 6.39b (40) | 39.09 ± 6.57a (40) |
Mean values with the same superscript letters are not statistically different (One-way ANOVA, Dunnett-C test, p > 0.05)
Fig. 2Mean microindentation hardness after caries removal. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD, *p < 0.05
SEM–EDX values (mean ± SD) for each caries removal method (n = 5)
| Conventional | Chemomechanical | Er:YAG laser | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca (wt%) | 44.68 ± 13.40 | 37.03 ± 11.72 | 38.85 ± 12.87 |
| P (wt%) | 55.76 ± 13.18 | 62.95 ± 11.68 | 61.15 ± 17.87 |
| Ca/P ratio | 0.91 ± 0.50 | 0.86 ± 0.91 | 0.78 ± 0.54 |
No significant differences were found among the groups in terms of all criteria (p > 0.05)
Fig. 3Comparison of the wt% of calcium and phosphorus for three caries removal methods. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD, p > 0.05