Literature DB >> 24320903

Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.

X Zhang1, R Tu, W Yin, X Zhou, X Li, D Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasiveness potential (MIP) of four dentine caries removal methods.
METHODS: After carious molars were scanned using micro-computerized tomography (micro-CT), dentine caries were removed by fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology, laser induced fluorescence (LIF), chemomechanical excavation (CME), and conventional excavation (CE). Micro-CT was then repeated. CRE was determined based on the volume of residual caries/initial caries (RC/IC) and the mean mineral density (MD) at the cavity floor. MIP was determined by measuring the volume of the prepared cavity/initial cavity (PC/IC).
RESULTS: Among the four groups, the LIF group had the smallest RC/IC (0.08), the highest mean MD at the cavity floor (1.32 g/cm(3) ) and the highest MIP (4.47). The CME group had the highest RC/IC (0.24), the lowest mean MD (1.01 g/cm(3) ) and the lowest MIP (2.23). The CE group exhibited a more acceptable CRE (RC/IC = 0.13, mean MD = 1.21 g/cm(3) ) but had a higher MIP (3.95). Both the CRE and MIP parameters of FACE technology were the second most acceptable (RC/IC = 0.12, mean MD = 1.13 g/cm(3) , MIP = 3.20) and did not differ significantly from the most acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS: FACE is an effective caries removal technology for removing infected dentine without significantly increasing cavity size.
© 2013 Australian Dental Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carisolv; DIAGNOdent; Fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE); caries excavation; dentine caries; micro-computerized tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320903     DOI: 10.1111/adj.12106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Bibliometric Analysis (2010-2020) of the Dental Scientific Literature on Chemo-Mechanical Methods of Caries Removal Using Carisolv and BRIX3000.

Authors:  Dana Cristina Bratu; Nicoleta Nikolajevic-Stoican; George Popa; Silvia Izabella Pop; Bianca Dragoș; Magda-Mihaela Luca
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Evaluation and Comparison of Caries Excavation Efficacy of Three Different Burs: A Micro-computed Tomographic-assisted Study.

Authors:  Vinay Vusurumarthi; Srinidhi V Ballullaya; Shankarappa Pushpa; Venkata Ramya K Veluvarti; Pramod R Loka; Pavan K Galla
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-04-14

Review 3.  Systematic review on alternative methods for caries removal in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Vijayapriyangha Senthilkumar; Sindhu Ramesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-10-10

4.  Microindentation hardness and calcium/phosphorus ratio of dentin following excavation of dental caries lesions with different techniques.

Authors:  Gunseli Katirci; R Banu Ermis
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-22

5.  Comparison of two different methods of detecting residual caries.

Authors:  Uzay Koç Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kütük; Esra Ergin; Filiz Yalçın Çakır; Sevil Gürgan
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-01-25

6.  Microhardness and shear bond-strength of carious dentin after fluorescence-aided or conventionally excavation: (An in-vitro comparison).

Authors:  Uzay Koç-Vural; Esra Ergin; Sevil Gurgan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.