Literature DB >> 27721693

Xanthomonas euvesicatoria Causes Bacterial Spot Disease on Pepper Plant in Korea.

Min-Seong Kyeon1, Soo-Hyeong Son1, Young-Hee Noh1, Yong-Eon Kim1, Hyok-In Lee2, Jae-Soon Cha1.   

Abstract

In 2004, bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads (BSX) were reclassified into 4 species-Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, X. vesicatoria, X. perforans, and X. gardneri. Bacterial spot disease on pepper plant in Korea is known to be caused by both X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria and X. vesicatoria. Here, we reidentified the pathogen causing bacterial spots on pepper plant based on the new classification. Accordingly, 72 pathogenic isolates were obtained from the lesions on pepper plants at 42 different locations. All isolates were negative for pectolytic activity. Five isolates were positive for amylolytic activity. All of the Korean pepper isolates had a 32 kDa-protein unique to X. euvesicatoria and had the same band pattern of the rpoB gene as that of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans as indicated by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. A phylogenetic tree of 16S rDNA sequences showed that all of the Korean pepper plant isolates fit into the same group as did all the reference strains of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans. A phylogenetic tree of the nucleotide sequences of 3 housekeeping genes-gapA, gyrB, and lepA showed that all of the Korean pepper plant isolates fit into the same group as did all of the references strains of X. euvesicatoria. Based on the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, we identified the pathogen as X. euvesicatoria. Neither X. vesicatoria, the known pathogen of pepper bacterial spot, nor X. perforans, the known pathogen of tomato plant, was isolated. Thus, we suggest that the pathogen causing bacterial spot disease of pepper plants in Korea is X. euvesicatoria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xanthomonas euvesicatoria; bacterial spot disease; pepper plants; re-identification

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721693      PMCID: PMC5051562          DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2016.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Pathol J        ISSN: 1598-2254            Impact factor:   1.795


Bacterial spot disease occurs on pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in warm, humid areas worldwide and causes lesions on the leaves, stems, and fruits (Jones et al., 2000; Stall et al., 1994). Yellow haloes appear around the lesions; smaller lesions coalesce into larger ones. Leaf infection results in blight, necrosis, and early leaf fall. These cause a reduction in photosynthesis and fruit infection, resulting in direct economic loss (Jones et al., 1991; Obradovic et al., 2004; Stall et al., 1994). Contaminated seeds and plant debris are common inoculum sources, and the disease is also transmitted by rain splash (Jones et al., 1991). The pathogens causing bacterial spot disease were originally identified as Bacterium vesicatoria (Doidge, 1921) and B. exitiosum (Gardner and Kendrick, 1921). The 2 bacteria were later classified as Xanthomonas vesicatoria and then as X. campestris pv. vesicatoria by Young et al. (1978). Based on DNA homology by Vauterin et al. (1995), X. campestris pv. vesicatoria was separated into 2 species—X. vesicatoria and X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Pseudomonas gardneri was first reported as the pathogen causing bacterial spot on tomato (Šutic, 1957) but was later reclassified as X. gardneri (De Ley, 1978; Dye, 1966). Jones et al. (2004) reported that all of the bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads (BSX) were reclassified as 4 species—X. euvesicatoria, X. vesicatoria, X. perforans, and X. gardneri. Among them, X. euvesicatoria and X. vesicatoria cause diseases on both pepper and tomato, while X. perforans and X. gardneri are known to infect only tomato. Recently, however, X. perforans was isolated from the pepper plant (Potnis et al., 2015). X. vesicatoria and X. perforans have strong amylolytic and pectolytic activity, but X. euvesicatoria and X. gardneri do not (Bouzar et al., 1994; Jones et al., 2000, 2004). X. euvesicatoria has a unique 32 kDa protein, while the other BSX have a 27 kDa protein (Bouzar et al., 1994; Jones et al., 2004). In addition, there are differences in carbon source utilization among BSX species (Jones et al., 2004; Stoyanova et al., 2014; Vauterin et al., 1995). RpoB based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Ferreira-Tonin et al., 2012), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Hamza et al., 2012) and multilocus sequence analysis (Almeida et al., 2010; Hamza et al., 2012; Kebede et al., 2014; Timilsina et al., 2015) were used to differentiate 4 species of BSX. Bacterial spot is a common disease on pepper plants in Korea (Kim, 2004; Lee and Cho, 1996; Lee et al., 1999; Myung et al., 2005, 2006), and X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria and X. vesicatoria are listed as the causative pathogens (Yoo, 2009). X. perforans was reported as the causal agent of bacterial spot on tomato for the first time from a nursery farm in Korea (Myung et al., 2009). It is not clear as to which pathogens cause bacterial spot disease of pepper in Korea since X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria is no longer included in the list of BSX, and since X. perforans, which was known to cause the disease on pepper plant, has been isolated only from tomato. The correct identification of the bacterial spot pathogen on pepper is important for plant quarantine, disease management, and breeding for resistance. In this study, the pathogen causing bacterial spot disease of pepper was reidentified by the isolation and identification of bacterial spot disease pathogens throughout Korea. To ensure correct identification, several phenotypic and genotypic characteristics were used, including amylolytic activity, pectolytic activity, unique protein band on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), rpoB based RFLP, phylogenetic analysis with 16S rDNA sequences, and sequences of 3 housekeeping genes.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and pathogenicity test

Pepper leaves showing typical bacterial spot lesions were collected throughout Korea during 2013–2015. Small pieces of leaf lesions were macerated in sterile water, and the resulting suspension was streaked on nutrient agar (NA) (DifcoTM; BD, Sparks, MD, USA). After incubation at 27°C for 3–5 days, distinct single colonies were purified by subculturing. Isolates were stored in a deep freezer. Bacterial suspensions, optical density measured at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD600) = 0.1 (ca. 1.0 × 108 cfu/ml) were prepared on NA in sterile water using 3-day-old cell cultures, and the suspensions were sprayed on pepper and tomato seedlings. The inoculated plants were saturated and maintained in a humid environment for 48 h and then in the greenhouse. Bacterial spot symptoms were observed 3 weeks post-inoculation.

Reference strains

Twenty-nine different strains from 4 BSX species were used as reference strains in this study (Table 1).
Table 1

List of bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads strains used in this study

SpeciesStrain*HostOriginYear
Xanthomonas euvesicatoria75-3SLUSANK
85-10SLUSA1985
155SLUSA1985
E3SLUSANK
LMG667SLNK1976
LMG905NKIndiaNK
NCPPB936CAUSA1939
NCPPB941CAUSA1939
NCPPB2968TCAUSA1947
X. vesicatoriaATCC11551SLUSA1943
LMG916SLNew Zealand1955
LMG924SLHungary1957
NCPPB422TSLNew Zealand1955
NCPPB424SLNew Zealand1955
NCPPB509SLZimbabwe1956
NCPPB701SLZimbabwe1956
NCPPB1431SLHungary1957
X. perforansGEV1026SLUSA2012
KACC16356SLKorea2007
KACC16357SLKorea2007
NCPPB4321TSLUSA1991
NCPPB4322SLUSA1993
TB15SLUSA2013
Xp10-13SLUSA2006
Xp19-10SLUSA2006
X. gardneri444SLCosta Rica1991
NCPPB881TSLYugoslavia1953
NCPPB4323SLCosta Rica1991
NCPPB4324SLCosta Rica1991

SL, Solanum lycopersicum; NK, not known; CA, Capsicum annuum.

LMG, Collection of the laboratorium voor Microbiologie en Microbiele Genetica, Ghent University, Belgium; NCPPB, National Collection of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Central Science Laboratory, United Kingdom; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, USA; KACC, Korean Agricultural Culture Collection, Rural Development Administration, Korea; 75-3, 85-10, 155 from Stall; GEV1026, TB15, Xp10-13, Xp19-10, 444 from Jones; E3 from Hert.

Amylolytic and pectolytic assays

Amylolytic and pectolytic assays were carried out according to the method of Bouzar et al. (1994). Bacteria were streaked on brilliant cresyl blue-starch (BS) agar and incubated at 27°C for 2 days. Haloes around the colonies indicated that the strain was positive for amylolytic activity. For pectolytic assay, bacterial cells were spotted on crystal violet pectate (CVP) agar and incubated at 27°C for 2 days. Dents around the colonies indicated that the strain was positive for pectolytic activity.

Observation of unique proteins by SDS-PAGE

SDS-PAGE for the observation of proteins unique to BSX species was carried out according to the method of Bouzar et al. (1994). Bacteria were cultured in 3 ml NA (BD DifcoTM) at 27°C for 18 h. Two milliliters of bacterial culture were harvested by centrifugation (> 13,000 × g) for 10 min, and the bacterial cells were washed twice in sterile water. The cell pellet was resuspended in 180 μl of 10% sorbitol and the bacterial suspension was mixed with an equal volume of 2 × sampling buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 2% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.04% bromophenol blue, and 4% SDS). After heating at 100°C for 10 min, 10 μl of suspension were electrophoresed in 12% resolving gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie R250 staining solution (0.1% Coomassie Blue R250 in 10% acetic acid, 45% methanol, 45% H2O) for more than 1 h and destained for more than 2 h.

rpoB gene based RFLP

The rpoB based RFLP was carried out according to the method of Ferreira-Tonin et al. (2012). The rpoB gene was amplified with rpoB2F (5′-TCA AGG AGC GTC TGT CGA T-3′) and rpoB3R (5′-TCT GCC TCG TTG ACC TTG A-3′) primers. PCR amplification was performed in PCR reaction mixture (25 μl) of Takara Ex Taq PCR kit (Takara Co., Shiga, Japan) containing 1 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl) and 10 μl of genomic DNA (20 ng/μl). The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 63°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified and 300 ng of purified PCR product was restricted with HaeIII (FastDigest-Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The resulting DNA bands were observed after electrophoresis on a 4% agarose gel.

Phylogenetic tree with 16S rDNA sequences

The 16S rDNA was amplified with 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′). The amplicons were sequenced Macrogen Co. (Seoul, Korea). Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the MEGA 6.0 program with neighbor-joining tree, Kimura 2-parameter model, and 3,000 bootstrap value.

Phylogenetic tree with multilocus sequences

Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) was carried out using 3 housekeeping genes—gapA, gyrB, and lepA. The PCR were carried out according to the method of Almeida et al. (2010). PCR primers were gap-1-F (5′-GGC AAT CAA GGT TGG YAT CAA CG-3′) and gap-1-R (5′-ATC TCC AGG CAC TTG TTS GAR TAG-3′) for gapA, gyrB-F (5′-AAG TTC GAC GAC AAC AGC TAC AA-3′) and gyrB-R (5′-GAM AGC ACY GCG ATC ATG CCT TC-3′) for gyrB, and lepA-F (5′-AAG CSC AGG TGC TCG ACT CCA AC-3′) and lepA-R (5′-CGT TCC TGC ACG ATT TCC ATG TG-3′). PCR reactions were performed in reaction mixture (25 μl) of Takara Ex Taq PCR kit containing 1 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl) and 10 μl of genomic DNA (10 ng/μl). The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The amplicons were sequenced at Macrogen Co. The concatenated sequence was 444 bp of gapA, 411 bp of gyrB, and 390 of lepA. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the MEGA 6.0 program with neighbor-joining tree, Kimura 2-parameter model, and 3,000 bootstrap value.

Results

Pathogen isolation

All isolates from the bacterial spot lesions of pepper plants were tested for pathogenicity on both pepper and tomato plants. About 5–10 days after inoculation, water soaked spots started to appear on the lower epidermis of leaves. Circular dark brown and black spots appeared, followed by yellow haloes around some of the spots (Fig. 1). A total of 72 isolates caused typical bacterial spot symptoms on both pepper and tomato plants. Our tests indicated that all of the isolates are pathogenic to both pepper and tomato plants despite the fact that all of them were isolated from only pepper plants. The pathogens were isolated from isolates collected from 42 different locations that cover all provinces of Korea, including Jeju Island (Table 2). The 2 pathogenic isolates CNUPBL 2030 and CNUPBL 2058 were deposited in Korean Agricultural Culture Collection as KACC18722 and KACC18723.
Fig. 1

Bacterial spot symptoms on pepper and tomato leaves inoculated with CNUPBL 2039, a pathogenic isolate from bacterial spot lesion of pepper plant. Lesions on the upper epidermis of pepper leaf (A), lower epidermis of pepper leaf (B), upper epidermis of tomato leaf (C), and lower epidermis of tomato leaf (D).

Table 2

List of the pathogenic isolates from bacterial spot lesion of the pepper plants in the Korea

Isolate*LocationYear
CNUPBL 1984Gundong, Gangjin2013
CNUPBL 1985Gundong, Gangjin2013
CNUPBL 1986Beopjeon, Bonghwa2013
CNUPBL 1987Jaesan, Bonghwa2013
CNUPBL 1988Yeonmu, Nonsan2013
CNUPBL 1989Gonggeun, Hoengseong2014
CNUPBL 1990Bokheung, Sunchang2014
CNUPBL 1991Gobu, Jeongeup2014
CNUPBL 1992Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1993Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1994Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1995Aewol, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1996Dopyeong, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1997Dopyeong, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1998Dopyeong, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 1999Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 2000Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 2001Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 2002Jocheon, Jeju2014
CNUPBL 2003Cheongso, Boryeong2014
CNUPBL 2004Inji, Seosan2014
CNUPBL 2005Inji, Seosan2014
CNUPBL 2006Inji, Seosan2014
CNUPBL 2007Eumam, Seosan2014
CNUPBL 2008Eumam, Seosan2014
CNUPBL 2009Bongsan, Yesan2014
CNUPBL 2010Bongsan, Yesan2014
CNUPBL 2011Oga, Yesan2014
CNUPBL 2012Oga, Yesan2014
CNUPBL 2013Oga, Yesan2014
CNUPBL 2014Myeoncheon, Dangjin2014
CNUPBL 2015Daesan, Gochang2014
CNUPBL 2016Samgye, Jangseong2014
CNUPBL 2017Samgye, Jangseong2014
CNUPBL 2018Hwangnyong, Jangseong2014
CNUPBL 2019Hwangnyong, Jangseong2014
CNUPBL 2020Myoryang, Yeonggwang2014
CNUPBL 2021Myoryang, Yeonggwang2014
CNUPBL 2022Sinbuk, Yeongam2014
CNUPBL 2023Sinbuk, Yeongam2014
CNUPBL 2024Sinbuk, Yeongam2014
CNUPBL 2025Eomda, Hampyeong2014
CNUPBL 2026Eomda, Hampyeong2014
CNUPBL 2027Munpyeong, Naju2014
CNUPBL 2028Munpyeong, Naju2014
CNUPBL 2029Hanbando, Yeongwol2014
CNUPBL 2030Nam, Inje2014
CNUPBL 2031Inje, Inje2014
CNUPBL 2032Inje, Inje2014
CNUPBL 2033Seo, Cheorwon2014
CNUPBL 2034Seo, Cheorwon2014
CNUPBL 2035Nam, Yangju2014
CNUPBL 2036Nam, Yangju2014
CNUPBL 2037Nam, Yangju2014
CNUPBL 2038Gwangjeok, Yangju2014
CNUPBL 2039Gwangjeok, Yangju2014
CNUPBL 2040Tanhyeon, Paju2014
CNUPBL 2041Tanhyeon, Paju2014
CNUPBL 2042Tanhyeon, Paju2014
CNUPBL 2043Munsan, Paju2014
CNUPBL 2044Hwasan, Yeongcheon2014
CNUPBL 2046Hayang, Gyeongsan2014
CNUPBL 2047Woldeung, Suncheon2014
CNUPBL 2048Gyeombaek, Boseong2014
CNUPBL 2049Miryeok, Boseong2014
CNUPBL 2050Deungnyang, Boseong2014
CNUPBL 2058Jangseungpo, Geoje2014
CNUPBL 2091Dunnae, Hoengseong2015
CNUPBL 2092Simsheon, Youngdong2015
CNUPBL 2093Hallim, Jeju2015
CNUPBL 2096Pyoseon, Seogwipo2015
CNUPBL 2098Pyoseon, Seogwipo2015

All hosts are Capsicum annuum.

CNUPBL, Chunbuk National University Plant Bacteriology and Molecular Genetics Lab., Korea.

Deposited in Korean Agricultural Culture Collection as KACC18722 (CNUPBL2030) and KACC18723 (CNUPBL2058).

Phenotypic characteristics

All of the X. vesicatoria and X. perforans reference strains were positive for amylolytic and pectolytic activities, whereas all of the X. euvesicatoria and X. gardneri reference strains were negative for both enzyme activities (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 2, Table 3). Five isolates (CNUPBL 1999, 2030, 2038, 2039, 2092) of the Korean pepper pathogens were positive for amylolytic activity and the rest were negative. All of the Korean pepper pathogens were negative for pectolytic activity (Table 3). As for the unique protein of BSX species, all of the X. euvesicatoria reference strains had a 32 kDa protein band and the other reference strains had a 27 kDa protein band (Supplementary Fig. 3, Table 3). All of the Korean pepper pathogens had a 32 kDa protein that is unique to X. euvesicatoria (Table 3).
Table 3

Characteristics of BSX reference strains and the Korean pepper isolates

BSX strain or pepper isolateAmylolytic activityPectolytic hydrolysisSDS-PAGErpoB gene based RFLPAccession number

16S rDNAgapAgyrBlepA
Xanthomonas euvesicatoria75-332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301873KU939855KU887562KU939954
85-1032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301875KU939848KU887555KU939947
15532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301874KU939849KU887556KU939948
E332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301876KU939847KU887554KU939946
LMG66732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301877KU939856KU887563KU939955
LMG90532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301878KU939857KU887564KU939956
NCPPB93632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301879KU939835KU867863KU939934
NCPPB94132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301880KU939836KU887543KU939935
NCPPB2968T32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301881KU939837KU887544KU939936
X. vesicatoriaATCC11551++27 kDaX.vKU301882KU939860KU887567KU939959
LMG916++27 kDaX.vKU301883KU939858KU887565KU939957
LMG924++27 kDaX.vKU301884KU939859KU887566KU939958
NCPPB422T++27 kDaX.vKU301885KU939838KU887545KU939937
NCPPB424++27 kDaX.vKU301886KU939839KU887546KU939938
NCPPB509++27 kDaX.vKU301887KU939840KU887547KU939939
NCPPB701++27 kDaX.vKU301888KU949841KU887548KU939940
NCPPB1431++27 kDaX.vKU301889KU939842KU887549KU939941
X. perforansGEV1026++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301890KU939850KU887557KU939949
KACC16356++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301891KU939861KU887568KU939960
KACC16357++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301892KU939862KU887569KU939961
NCPPB4321T++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301893KU939843KU887550KU939942
NCPPB4322++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301894KU939844KU887551KU939943
TB15++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301895KU939851KU887558KU939950
Xp10-13++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301896KU939852KU887559KU939951
Xp19-10++27 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301897KU939853KU887560KU939952
X. gardneri44427 kDaX.gKU301898KU939854KU887561KU939953
NCPPB881T27 kDaX.gKU301899KU939863KU887570KU939962
NCPPB432327 kDaX.gKU301900KU939845KU887552KU939944
NCPPB432427 kDaX.gKU301901KU939846KU887553KU939945
CNUPBL 198432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301902KU939864KU887571KU939963
CNUPBL 198532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301903KU939865KU887572KU939964
CNUPBL 198632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301904KU939866KU887573KU939965
CNUPBL 198732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301905KU939867KU887574KU939966
CNUPBL 198832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301906KU939868KU887575KU939967
CNUPBL 198932 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301907KU939869KU887576KU939968
CNUPBL 199032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU301908KU939870KU887577KU939969
CNUPBL 199132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308457KU939871KU887578KU939970
CNUPBL 199232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308458KU939872KU887579KU939971
CNUPBL 199332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308459KU939873KU887580KU939972
CNUPBL 199432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308460KU939874KU887581KU939973
CNUPBL 199532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308461KU939875KU887582KU939974
CNUPBL 199632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308462KU939876KU887583KU939975
CNUPBL 199732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308463KU939877KU887584KU939976
CNUPBL 199832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308464KU939878KU887585KU939977
CNUPBL 1999+32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308465KU939879KU887586KU939978
CNUPBL 200032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308466KU939880KU887587KU939979
CNUPBL 200132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308467KU950308KU887626KU939980
CNUPBL 200232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308468KU939881KU887625KU939981
CNUPBL 200332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308469KU939882KU887624KU939982
CNUPBL 200432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308470KU939883KU887623KU939983
CNUPBL 200532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308471KU939884KU887622KU939984
CNUPBL 200632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU308472KU939885KU887621KU939985
CNUPBL 200732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323669KU939886KU887620KU939986
CNUPBL 200832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323670KU939887KU887619KU939987
CNUPBL 200932 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323671KU939888KU887618KU939988
CNUPBL 201032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323672KU939889KU887617KU939989
CNUPBL 201132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323673KU939890KU887616KU939990
CNUPBL 201232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323674KU939891KU887615KU939991
CNUPBL 201332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323675KU939892KU887614KU939992
CNUPBL 201432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323676KU939893KU887613KU939993
CNUPBL 201532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323677KU939894KU887612KU939994
CNUPBL 201632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323678KU939895KU887611KU939995
CNUPBL 201732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323679KU939896KU887610KU939996
CNUPBL 201832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323680KU939897KU887609KU939997
CNUPBL 201932 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323681KU939898KU887608KU939998
CNUPBL 202032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323682KU939899KU887607KU939999
CNUPBL 202132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323683KU939900KU887606KU940000
CNUPBL 202232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323684KU939901KU887605KU940001
CNUPBL 202332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323685KU939902KU887604KU940002
CNUPBL 202432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323686KU950309KU887603KU940003
CNUPBL 202532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323686KU939903KU887602KU940004
CNUPBL 202632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323687KU939904KU887601KU940005
CNUPBL 202732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323688KU939905KU887600KU940006
CNUPBL 202832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323689KU939906KU887599KU940007
CNUPBL 202932 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323690KU939907KU887598KU940008
CNUPBL 2030+32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323691KU939908KU887597KU940009
CNUPBL 203132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323692KU939909KU887596KU940010
CNUPBL 203232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323693KU939910KU887595KU940011
CNUPBL 203332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323694KU939911KU887594KU940012
CNUPBL 203432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323695KU939912KU887593KU940013
CNUPBL 203532 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323696KU939913KU887592KU940014
CNUPBL 203632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323697KU939914KU887591KU940015
CNUPBL 203732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323698KU939915KU887590KU940016
CNUPBL 2038+32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323699KU939916KU887589KU940017
CNUPBL 2039+32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323700KU939917KU887588KU940018
CNUPBL 204032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323701KU939918KU887628KU940019
CNUPBL 204132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323702KU939919KU887629KU940020
CNUPBL 204232 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323703KU939920KU887630KU940021
CNUPBL 204332 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323704KU939921KU887631KU940022
CNUPBL 204432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323705KU939922KU887632KU940023
CNUPBL 204632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323706KU939923KU887633KU940024
CNUPBL 204732 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323707KU939924KU887634KU940025
CNUPBL 204832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323708KU939925KU887635KU940026
CNUPBL 204932 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323709KU939926KU887636KU940027
CNUPBL 205032 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323710KU939927KU887637KU940028
CNUPBL 205832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323711KU939928KU887638KU940029
CNUPBL 209132 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323712KU939929KU887639KU940030
CNUPBL 2092+32 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323713KU939930KU887640KU940031
CNUPBL 209432 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323714KU939931KU887641KU940032
CNUPBL 209632 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323715KU939932KU887642KU940033
CNUPBL 209832 kDaX.ev or X.pKU323716KU939933KU887643KU940034

BSX, bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; X.ev, Xanthomonas euvesicatoria; X.p, X. perforans; X.v, X. vesicatoria; X.g, X. gardneri.

Genotypic characteristics

In rpoB gene-based RFLP, all of the X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans reference strains had the same DNA band pattern with DNA bands of 339 bp, 154 bp, and 153 bp. X. vesicatoria and X. gardneri had DNA band patterns different from those of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans, and also had different patterns from each other. X. vesicatoria had DNA bands of 216 bp, 123 bp, and 106 bp, and X. gardneri had DNA bands of 215 bp, 156 bp, 154 bp, and 123 bp (Fig. 2). All of the Korean pepper pathogens had the same DNA band pattern as that of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans (Table 3).
Fig. 2

Result of rpoB gene based restriction fragment length polymorphism. Lanes 1–3, Xanthomonas euvesicatoria 75-3, LMG667, LMG905; Lanes 4–6, X. vesicatoria LMG916, LMG924, ATCC11551; Lanes 7 and 8, X. perforans KACC16356, KACC16357; Lane 9, X. gardneri NCPPB881; Lane 10, negative control.

A phylogenetic tree of the 16S rDNA sequences showed that all of X. vesicatoria and X. gardneri reference strains were grouped into their own clade. All X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans reference strains, however, were grouped into a different clade. All of the Korean pepper pathogens were grouped together with the reference strains of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans (Fig. 3). In a phylogenetic tree of the concatenated sequences of gapA, gyrB, and lepA, all of the reference strains of each species were grouped into the same clade with strains of the same species. All of the Korean pepper pathogens were grouped together with the reference strains of X. euvesicatoria (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of 16S rDNA sequences of bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads strains and Korean pepper isolates using MEGA 6.0 program, neighbor-joining tree, Kimura 2-parameter model, and 3,000 bootstrap samples.

Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree of a concatenated sequence of gapA, gyrB, and lepA of bacterial spot-causing xanthomonads strains and Korean pepper isolates using MEGA 6.0 program, neighbor-joining tree, Kimura 2-parameter model, and 3,000 bootstrap samples.

Discussion

In this study, 72 pathogenic isolates were collected from bacterial spot lesions on pepper plants throughout Korea in order to reidentify the causative pathogen. The 3 phenotypic characteristics of the Korean pepper pathogens and the BSX reference strains were compared for correct identification. The 3 major characteristics were used to separate the 4 species of BSX referred to by Jones et al. (2004). All of the Korean pepper pathogens were negative for pectolytic activity, and all except 5 isolates were negative for amylolytic activity. These traits were identical to those of X. euvesicatoria and X. gardneri. The 5 amylolytic-positive isolates are not considered to be typical strains of X. euvesicatoria or X. perforans. Recently, Stoyanova et al. (2014) argued that some phenotype characteristics such as amylolytic activity and the utilization of cis-aconitic acid cannot be species-separating criteria of the BSX group. However, all of the Korean pepper pathogens have a 32 kDa protein that is unique to X. euvesicatoria. Thus, our results of the analysis of the 3 phenotypic characteristics suggest that all of the Korean pepper pathogens are X. euvesicatoria. The result of rpoB based RFLP showed that all of the Korean pepper pathogens have DNA band patterns identical to those of X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans. A phylogenetic tree of the 16S rDNA sequences also showed that all of the Korean pepper pathogens were grouped together with X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans. These results suggest that rpoB based RFLP and 16S sequences are not enough to separate the 2 BSX species, X. euvesicatoria and X. perforans. These results also indicate that the 2 are very closely related to each other. MLSA generally gives more detailed genotypic information than does 16S rDNA sequencing. Several previous MLSA studies have also differentiated the 4 species of BSX (Almeida et al., 2010; Hamza et al., 2012; Kebede et al., 2014; Timilsnia et al., 2015). A phylogenetic tree of 3 housekeeping genes (gapA, gyrB, and lepA) showed that all of the Korean pepper isolates were grouped together into the same clade as that of the reference strains of X. euvesicatoria. The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the Korean pepper pathogens suggest that all of those collected in this study are in fact X. euvesicatoria. Neither X. vesicatoria, which is considered the causative pathogen of pepper bacterial spot in the List of Plant Diseases in Korea (Yoo, 2009), nor X. perforans, which was recently reported as the causative pathogen of tomato bacterial spot, was isolated. It might be erroneous to designate X. vesicatoria as a causative pathogen of pepper bacterial spot in Korea since we could not find literature references for this. Although there is one study on the isolation of X. perforans from pepper plant in the United States, this species does not cause disease on pepper plant in Korea. Nevertheless, bacterial spot caused by X. perforans was reported on nursery-raised tomatoes in Korea, but not on field-grown tomatoes (Myung et al., 2009). X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria is another species identified as a causative pathogen of pepper bacterial spot according to the List of Plant Diseases in Korea (Yoo, 2009). It was renamed as X. euvesicatoria following the reclassification of the 4 BSX species. The results of the present study suggest that the bacterial spot of pepper plant in Korea is caused exclusively by X. euvesicatoria. Recently, Myung et al. (2015) reported that the latest strain of pepper bacterial spot disease in Korea is caused by X. euvesicatoria. Based on our study, the pepper bacterial spot reported as a new disease is in fact not new, but rather it is caused by the same pathogen whose scientific name was revised by Jones et al. (2004).
  8 in total

1.  Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Jones; George H Lacy; Hacene Bouzar; Robert E Stall; Norman W Schaad
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Bacterial spot of tomato and pepper: diverse Xanthomonas species with a wide variety of virulence factors posing a worldwide challenge.

Authors:  Neha Potnis; Sujan Timilsina; Amanda Strayer; Deepak Shantharaj; Jeri D Barak; Mathews L Paret; Gary E Vallad; Jeffrey B Jones
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.663

3.  Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas based on partial rpoB gene sequences and species differentiation by PCR-RFLP.

Authors:  Mariana Ferreira-Tonin; Júlio Rodrigues-Neto; Ricardo Harakava; Suzete Aparecida Lanza Destéfano
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Multilocus sequence analysis of xanthomonads causing bacterial spot of tomato and pepper plants reveals strains generated by recombination among species and recent global spread of Xanthomonas gardneri.

Authors:  Sujan Timilsina; Mustafa O Jibrin; Neha Potnis; Gerald V Minsavage; Misrak Kebede; Allison Schwartz; Rebecca Bart; Brian Staskawicz; Claudine Boyer; Gary E Vallad; Olivier Pruvost; Jeffrey B Jones; Erica M Goss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  MultiLocus Sequence Analysis- and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism-based characterization of xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot of tomato and pepper and their relatedness to Xanthomonas species.

Authors:  A A Hamza; I Robene-Soustrade; E Jouen; P Lefeuvre; F Chiroleu; M Fisher-Le Saux; L Gagnevin; O Pruvost
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions.

Authors:  J B Jones; H Bouzar; R E Stall; E C Almira; P D Roberts; B W Bowen; J Sudberry; P M Strickler; J Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  PAMDB, a multilocus sequence typing and analysis database and website for plant-associated microbes.

Authors:  Nalvo F Almeida; Shuangchun Yan; Rongman Cai; Christopher R Clarke; Cindy E Morris; Norman W Schaad; Erin L Schuenzel; George H Lacy; Xiaoan Sun; Jeffrey B Jones; Jose A Castillo; Carolee T Bull; Scotland Leman; David S Guttman; João C Setubal; Boris A Vinatzer
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Differentiation of Xanthomonas spp. Causing Bacterial Spot in Bulgaria Based on Biolog System.

Authors:  Mariya Stoyanova; Taca Vancheva; Penka Moncheva; Nevena Bogatzevska
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-14
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The extracellular matrix protects Bacillus subtilis colonies from Pseudomonas invasion and modulates plant co-colonization.

Authors:  Carlos Molina-Santiago; John R Pearson; Yurena Navarro; María Victoria Berlanga-Clavero; Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodriguez; Daniel Petras; María Luisa García-Martín; Gaelle Lamon; Birgit Haberstein; Francisco M Cazorla; Antonio de Vicente; Antoine Loquet; Pieter C Dorrestein; Diego Romero
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Molecular methods for diversity assessment among xanthomonads of Bulgarian and Macedonian pepper.

Authors:  Taca Vancheva; Mariya Stoyanova; Elena Tasheva-Terzieva; Nevena Bogatzevska; Penka Moncheva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  Isolation and characterization of Bacillus sp. strain BC01 from soil displaying potent antagonistic activity against plant and fish pathogenic fungi and bacteria.

Authors:  Md Javed Foysal; Asura Khanam Lisa
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Comparative Study of Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics to Reveal Microbiomes in Overwintering Pepper Fruits.

Authors:  Yeonhwa Jo; Chang-Gi Back; Kook-Hyung Kim; Hyosub Chu; Jeong Hun Lee; Sang Hyun Moh; Won Kyong Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.