Literature DB >> 27721518

Incorporation of dosimetry in the derivation of reference concentrations for ambient or workplace air: a conceptual approach.

Adriana R Oller1, Günter Oberdörster2.   

Abstract

Dosimetric models are essential tools to refine inhalation risk assessments based on local respiratory effects. Dosimetric adjustments to account for differences in aerosol particle size and respiratory tract deposition and/or clearance among rodents, workers, and the general public can be applied to experimentally- and epidemiologically-determined points of departure (PODs) to calculate size-selected (e.g., PM10, inhalable aerosol fraction, respirable aerosol fraction) equivalent concentrations (e.g., HEC or Human Equivalent Concentration; REC or Rodent Equivalent Concentration). A modified POD (e.g., HEC) can then feed into existing frameworks for the derivation of occupational or ambient air concentration limits or reference concentrations. HECs that are expressed in terms of aerosol particle sizes experienced by humans but are derived from animal studies allow proper comparison of exposure levels and associated health effects in animals and humans. This can inform differences in responsiveness between animals and humans, based on the same deposited or retained doses and can also allow the use of both data sources in an integrated weight of evidence approach for hazard and risk assessment purposes. Whenever possible, default values should be replaced by substance-specific and target population-specific parameters. Assumptions and sources of uncertainty need to be clearly reported.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPPD model; human equivalent concentration; point of departure; risk assessment

Year:  2016        PMID: 27721518      PMCID: PMC5051659          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Sci        ISSN: 0021-8502            Impact factor:   3.433


  22 in total

1.  Incorporation of particle size differences between animal studies and human workplace aerosols for deriving exposure limit values.

Authors:  Adriana R Oller; Günter Oberdörster
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Lung clearance and retention of toner, utilizing a tracer technique, during chronic inhalation exposure in rats.

Authors:  B Bellmann; H Muhle; O Creutzenberg; C Dasenbrock; R Kilpper; J C MacKenzie; P Morrow; R Mermelstein
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1991-08

3.  A multiple-path model of particle deposition in the rat lung.

Authors:  S Anjilvel; B Asgharian
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1995-11

Review 4.  Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose-response relationships of inhaled particles.

Authors:  G Oberdorster
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Dosimetric comparisons of particle deposition and retention in rats and humans.

Authors:  James S Brown; William E Wilson; Lester D Grant
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Dosimetric adjustments for interspecies extrapolation of inhaled poorly soluble particles (PSP).

Authors:  Annie M Jarabek; Bahman Asgharian; Frederick J Miller
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Modelling particle retention in the alveolar-interstitial region of the human lungs.

Authors:  D Gregoratto; M R Bailey; J W Marsh
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  New predictive equation for lung volume using chest computed tomography for size matching in lung transplantation.

Authors:  C H Park; T H Kim; S Lee; H C Paik; S J Haam
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Estimating lung burdens based on individual particle density estimated from scanning electron microscopy and cascade impactor samples.

Authors:  Frederick J Miller; Swiatoslav W Kaczmar; Ruth Danzeisen; Owen R Moss
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Translational toxicology in setting occupational exposure limits for dusts and hazard classification - a critical evaluation of a recent approach to translate dust overload findings from rats to humans.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Joachim Bruch; Len Levy; Yufanyi Ngiewih; Ishrat Chaudhuri; Henry J Muranko; Ross Myerson; Robert J McCunney
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.400

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing risk assessments for the development of occupational exposure limits for engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P A Schulte; E D Kuempel; N M Drew
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Modelled lung deposition and retention of welding fume particles in occupational scenarios: a comparison to doses used in vitro.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Hanna L Karlsson; Ulrika Carlander
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Review and Evaluation of the Potential Health Effects of Oxidic Nickel Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sharlee L More; Michael Kovochich; Tara Lyons-Darden; Michael Taylor; Alexandra M Schulte; Amy K Madl
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  On the pivotal role of dose for particle toxicology and risk assessment: exposure is a poor surrogate for delivered dose.

Authors:  Otmar Schmid; Flemming R Cassee
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 9.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.