Literature DB >> 27720531

Focal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound of Unilateral Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Hemiablation Study of 111 Patients.

Pascal Rischmann1, Albert Gelet2, Benjamin Riche3, Arnauld Villers4, Gilles Pasticier5, Pierre Bondil6, Jean-Luc Jung7, Hubert Bugel8, Jacques Petit9, Harry Toledano10, Stéphane Mallick11, Olivier Rouvière12, Muriel Rabilloud3, Hélène Tonoli-Catez13, Sebastien Crouzet2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to a third of patients with localized prostate cancer have unilateral disease that may be suitable for partial treatment with hemiablation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to achieve local control of the tumor in patients with unilateral localized prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The French Urological Association initiated a prospective IDEAL multi-institutional study (2009-2015), to evaluate HIFU-hemiablation as a primary treatment. INTERVENTION: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy were used for unilateral cancer diagnosis and control, and HIFU-hemiablation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary: absence of clinically significant cancer (CSC) on control biopsy at 1 yr (CSC: Gleason score ≥ 7 or cancer core length>3mm regardless of grade or > 2 positive cores). Secondary: presence of any cancer on biopsy, biochemical response, radical treatment free survival, adverse events, continence (no pad), erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function-5 ≥ 16), and quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C28) questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: One hundred and eleven patients were treated (mean age: 64.8 yr [standard deviation 6.2]; mean prostate-specific antigen: 6.2 ng/ml [standard deviation 2.6]; 68% low risk, 32% intermediate risk). Of the 101 patients with control biopsy, 96 (95%) and 94 (93%) had no CSC in the treated and contralateral lobes, respectively. Mean prostate-specific antigen at 2 yr was 2.3 ng/ml (standard deviation 1.7). The radical treatment-free survival rate at 2 years was 89% (radical treatments: six radical prostatectomies, three radiotherapies, and two HIFU). Adverse events were Grade 3 in 13%. At 12 mo continence and erectile functions were preserved in 97% and 78%. No significant decrease in quality of life score was observed at 12 mo. One limitation is the number of low-risk patients included in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: At 1 yr, HIFU-hemiablation was efficient with 95% absence of clinically significant cancer associated with low morbidity and preservation of quality of life. Radical treatment-free survival rate was 89% at 2 yr. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This report shows that high intensity focused ultrasound half-gland treatment of unilateral prostate cancer provides promising results with high cancer control and low morbidity.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focal therapy; Hemiablation; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Prospective trial; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27720531     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  37 in total

1.  Multimodal Imaging in Focal Therapy Planning and Assessment in Primary Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 2.  Ablative options for prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa; Lucas Teixeira Batista; Xavier Cathelineau; Javier Sanchez-Macias; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

3.  Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa; Bradford J Wood; Andre Luis Abreu; Bruno Nahar; Toshitaka Shin; Selcuk Guven; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Focal therapy of prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Ganzer; T Franiel; J Köllermann; T Kuru; D Baumunk; A Blana; B Hadaschik; J von Hardenberg; T Henkel; K-U Köhrmann; U-B Liehr; S Machtens; A Roosen; G Salomon; H-P Schlemmer; L Sentker; J Wendler; U Witzsch; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Ultrasound for the treatment of acute kidney injury and other inflammatory conditions: a promising path toward noninvasive neuroimmune regulation.

Authors:  Jieru Cai; William T Nash; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2020-06-08

Review 6.  Interventional therapy in malignant conditions of the prostate.

Authors:  Attila Kovács; Michael Pinkawa
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Validation of the current eligibility criteria for focal therapy in men with localized prostate cancer and the role of MRI.

Authors:  Raisa S Pompe; Bieke Kühn-Thomä; Yamini Nagaraj; Valia Veleva; Felix Preisser; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Hyo Choi; Ji Woong Yu; Min Yong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  [High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) : Importance in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Ganzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.