Gloria D Sclar1, Gauthami Penakalapati1, Heather K Amato1, Joshua V Garn1, Kelly Alexander1, Matthew C Freeman1, Sophie Boisson2, Kate O Medlicott2, Thomas Clasen3. 1. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1516 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30306, United States. 2. Department of Public Health, the Environment and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1516 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30306, United States. Electronic address: thomas.f.clasen@emory.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fecal-oral transmission of enteric and other pathogens due to poor sanitation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in low- or middle-income settings. Few studies have investigated the impact of sanitation on indicators of transmission, a prerequisite to achieving health gains. This review attempts to summarize the literature to date. METHODS: We searched leading databases to identify studies that address the effect of sanitation on various transmission pathways including fecal pathogens or indicator bacteria in drinking water, hand contamination, sentinel toys, food, household and latrine surfaces and soil, as well as flies and observations of human feces. This also included studies that assessed the impact of fecal contamination of water supplies based on distance from sanitation facilities. We identified 29 studies that met the review's eligibility criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall, the studies found little to no effect from sanitation interventions on these transmission pathways. There was no evidence of effects on water quality (source or household), hand or sentinel toy contamination, food contamination, or contamination of surfaces or soil. There is some evidence that sanitation was associated with reductions in flies and a small effect on observations of feces (Risk Difference -0.03, 95%CI -0.06 to 0.01). Studies show an inverse relationship between the distance of a water supply from a latrine and level of fecal contamination of such water supply. Future evaluations of sanitation interventions should include assessments of effects along transmission pathways in order to better understand the circumstances under which interventions may be effective at preventing disease.
OBJECTIVE: Fecal-oral transmission of enteric and other pathogens due to poor sanitation is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in low- or middle-income settings. Few studies have investigated the impact of sanitation on indicators of transmission, a prerequisite to achieving health gains. This review attempts to summarize the literature to date. METHODS: We searched leading databases to identify studies that address the effect of sanitation on various transmission pathways including fecal pathogens or indicator bacteria in drinking water, hand contamination, sentinel toys, food, household and latrine surfaces and soil, as well as flies and observations of human feces. This also included studies that assessed the impact of fecal contamination of water supplies based on distance from sanitation facilities. We identified 29 studies that met the review's eligibility criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall, the studies found little to no effect from sanitation interventions on these transmission pathways. There was no evidence of effects on water quality (source or household), hand or sentinel toy contamination, food contamination, or contamination of surfaces or soil. There is some evidence that sanitation was associated with reductions in flies and a small effect on observations of feces (Risk Difference -0.03, 95%CI -0.06 to 0.01). Studies show an inverse relationship between the distance of a water supply from a latrine and level of fecal contamination of such water supply. Future evaluations of sanitation interventions should include assessments of effects along transmission pathways in order to better understand the circumstances under which interventions may be effective at preventing disease.
Authors: Jennyfer Wolf; Sydney Hubbard; Michael Brauer; Argaw Ambelu; Benjamin F Arnold; Robert Bain; Valerie Bauza; Joe Brown; Bethany A Caruso; Thomas Clasen; John M Colford; Matthew C Freeman; Bruce Gordon; Richard B Johnston; Andrew Mertens; Annette Prüss-Ustün; Ian Ross; Jeffrey Stanaway; Jeff T Zhao; Oliver Cumming; Sophie Boisson Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Drew Capone; David Berendes; Oliver Cumming; David Holcomb; Jackie Knee; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Karen Levy; Rassul Nalá; Benjamin B Risk; Jill Stewart; Joe Brown Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Ayse Ercumen; Amy J Pickering; Laura H Kwong; Benjamin F Arnold; Sarker Masud Parvez; Mahfuja Alam; Debashis Sen; Sharmin Islam; Craig Kullmann; Claire Chase; Rokeya Ahmed; Leanne Unicomb; Stephen P Luby; John M Colford Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Joshua V Garn; Gloria D Sclar; Matthew C Freeman; Gauthami Penakalapati; Kelly T Alexander; Patrick Brooks; Eva A Rehfuess; Sophie Boisson; Kate O Medlicott; Thomas F Clasen Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Freya Mills; Juliet Willetts; Susan Petterson; Cynthia Mitchell; Guy Norman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: H J Prudden; M Hasso-Agopsowicz; R E Black; C Troeger; R C Reiner; R F Breiman; M Jit; G Kang; L Lamberti; C F Lanata; B A Lopman; W Ndifon; V E Pitzer; J A Platts-Mills; M S Riddle; P G Smith; R Hutubessy; B Giersing Journal: Vaccine Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Ayse Ercumen; Amy J Pickering; Laura H Kwong; Andrew Mertens; Benjamin F Arnold; Jade Benjamin-Chung; Alan E Hubbard; Mahfuja Alam; Debashis Sen; Sharmin Islam; Md Zahidur Rahman; Craig Kullmann; Claire Chase; Rokeya Ahmed; Sarker Masud Parvez; Leanne Unicomb; Mahbubur Rahman; Pavani K Ram; Thomas Clasen; Stephen P Luby; John M Colford Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Ayse Ercumen; Andrew Mertens; Benjamin F Arnold; Jade Benjamin-Chung; Alan E Hubbard; Mir Alvee Ahmed; Mir Himayet Kabir; Md Masudur Rahman Khalil; Ashish Kumar; Md Sajjadur Rahman; Sarker Masud Parvez; Leanne Unicomb; Mahbubur Rahman; Pavani K Ram; Thomas Clasen; Stephen P Luby; John M Colford Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 9.028