Literature DB >> 27718162

Impact of the Use of Regional Poison Control Centers in an Urban EMS Dispatch System.

Michael Levine1, John Flores2, Seth A Seabury3, Stephen Sanko2,4, Marc Eckstein2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The public commonly calls 911 for unintentional ingestions, rather than calling the local poison center. By utilizing a series of scripted questions, 911 dispatchers in Los Angeles determine if an ingestion meets "omega-1" classification. Under such circumstances, the regional poison center is contacted prior to dispatch of paramedics. If the poison center advises that the patient can remain at home, EMS is not dispatched and the patient is followed at home by the poison center. The primary objective is to determine the number of averted transports through involvement of a poison center. A secondary objective is to determine the potential costs and charges saved with the use of such a strategy.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all overdose calls with an "omega-1" classification to a single EMS system between 1/2008-6/2012. Each call culminating in an EMS dispatch was subsequently reviewed by two additional reviewers. The cost savings was determined by utilizing data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2000 to 2010. Monetary values were adjusted to 2012 dollars.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen cases received "omega-1" dispatch classification. EMS was dispatched 19 times (5.98 %), and 11 patients (3.46 %) were ultimately transported. The most common reasons for transport were ambiguity over the ingested agent or amount, and caller insistence. Using these estimates, routine consultation of a regional poison center as part of EMS dispatch averted $486,595 in charges, and $183,279 in payments.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine consultation of a poison center by emergency medical dispatchers can reduce unnecessary dispatches, ambulance transports, and ED visits with significant associated cost savings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Dispatch; EMS; Paramedic; Poison control center

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27718162      PMCID: PMC5330961          DOI: 10.1007/s13181-016-0586-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Toxicol        ISSN: 1556-9039


  8 in total

1.  Utilization of prehospital dispatch protocols to identify low-acuity patients.

Authors:  Jonathan R Studnek; Lars Thestrup; Tom Blackwell; Barry Bagwell
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Emergency medical services' use of poison control centers for unintentional drug ingestions.

Authors:  Scott A Bier; Douglas J Borys
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury.

Authors:  Paul Hinchey; Brent Myers; Joseph Zalkin; Ryan Lewis; Donald Garner
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Implementation of prehospital dispatch protocols that triage low-acuity patients to advice-line nurses.

Authors:  Allison Infinger; Jonathan R Studnek; Eric Hawkins; Barry Bagwell; Doug Swanson
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Analysis of ambulance transports and diversions among US emergency departments.

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Linda F McCaig; Roberto H Valverde
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Poison control centers decrease emergency healthcare utilization costs.

Authors:  Frank LoVecchio; Steven Curry; Kathleen Waszolek; Jane Klemens; Kimberly Hovseth; Diane Glogan
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

Authors:  E H Gilbert; S R Lowenstein; J Koziol-McLain; D C Barta; J Steiner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Diversion of 911 poisoning calls to a poison center.

Authors:  B D Anderson; A S Manoguerra; B E Haynes
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.077

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.