Literature DB >> 27717423

Conduction Disorders After Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement.

Ismail Bouhout1, Amine Mazine1, Lena Rivard2, Aly Ghoneim1, Ismail El-Hamamsy1, Yoan Lamarche1, Michel Carrier1, Philippe Demers1, Denis Bouchard3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sutureless self-expandable aortic bioprostheses rely on radial forces for stabilization, raising concern that these devices may increase the risk of postoperative conduction disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of conduction disorders after sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Perceval S (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy) bioprosthesis.
METHODS: Between June 2011 and March 2013, 108 consecutive patients underwent sutureless AVR with the Perceval S prosthesis. Six patients (6%) had a permanent pacemaker (PPM) preoperatively and were excluded from the present study. Mean electrocardiographic follow-up was 14.6 ± 6.0 months.
RESULTS: Mean age was 79.2 ± 4.8 years (52% female). During the postoperative period, 34 patients (34%) had first-degree atrioventricular block, 2 (2%) had Mobitz-II atrioventricular block, and 16 (16%) had complete atrioventricular block. New-onset left bundle branch block and right bundle branch block were observed in 33 patients (33%) and 22 patients (22%), respectively. Inhospital postoperative PPM implantation was required in 23 patients (23%). Preoperative aortic valve area, age more than 85 years, and preoperative right bundle branch block were found to be independently associated with inhospital PPM implantation or new-onset postoperative conduction disorder. At follow-up, 3 more patients (3%) underwent PPM implantation. The cumulative incidences of PPM dependency and ventricular pacing more than 25% of the time were 18% ± 11% and 21% ± 10%, respectively, at 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the postoperative PPM implantation rate (23%) after sutureless AVR with the Perceval S prosthesis was high. Surgical strategies aimed at mitigating this risk should be further investigated.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27717423     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vincent Chauvette; Amine Mazine; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

2.  Early results of the Sorin® Perceval S sutureless valve: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karan Sian; Sheila Li; Daneish Selvakumar; Ross Mejia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Long-term outcomes of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Andrew A Mamo; David H Tian; Utz Kappert; Manuel Wilbring; Thierry Folliguet; Antonio Fiore; Antonio Miceli; Augusto D'Onofrio; Giorgia Cibin; Gino Gerosa; Mattia Glauber; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

4.  Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant.

Authors:  Olivier Fabre; Mihai Radutoiu; Ionut Carjaliu; Olivier Rebet; Laurence Gautier; Ilir Hysi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

5.  Surgical technique modifies the postoperative atrioventricular block rate in sutureless prostheses.

Authors:  Miguel González Barbeito; Francisco Estévez-Cid; Patricia Pardo Martínez; Carlos Velasco García de Sierra; Carmen Iglesias Gil; Cristina Quiñones Laguillo; José Joaquín Cuenca Castillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Thanos Athanasiou; Pasquale Mastroroberto; Khalil Fattouch; Giuseppe Nasso; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Recovery of conduction disorders after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ka Yan Lam; Naomi Timmermans; Ferdi Akca; Erwin Tan; Niels J Verberkmoes; Kim de Kort; Mohamed Soliman-Hamad; Albert H M van Straten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  Direct comparison of rapid deployment versus sutureless aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Yoonjin Kang; Ji Seong Kim; Jae Woong Choi; Myoung-Jin Jang; Ho Young Hwang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Need for permanent pacemaker implantation following implantation of the rapid deployment valve in combined procedures: a single centre cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver Deutsch; Isabell Deisenhofer; Katharina Koch-Buettner; Rüdiger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Amalan Thuraisingam; Andrew E Newcomb
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.