| Literature DB >> 27716801 |
Stephanos Ioannou1, Paul Morris2, Samantha Terry2, Marc Baker2, Vittorio Gallese3,4, Vasudevi Reddy2.
Abstract
Sympathy crying is an odd and complex mixture of physiological and emotional phenomena. Standard psychophysiological theories of emotion cannot attribute crying to a single subdivision of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and disagreement exists regarding the emotional origin of sympathy crying. The current experiment examines sympathy crying using functional thermal infrared imaging (FTII), a novel contactless measure of ANS activity. To induce crying female participants were given the choice to decide which film they wanted to cry to. Compared to baseline, temperature started increasing on the forehead, the peri-orbital region, the cheeks and the chin before crying and reached even higher temperatures during crying. The maxillary area showed the opposite pattern and a gradual temperature decrease was observed compared to baseline as a result of emotional sweating. The results suggest that tears of sympathy are part of a complex autonomic interaction between the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nervous systems, with the latter preceding the former. The emotional origin of the phenomenon seems to derive from subjective internal factors that relate to one's personal experiences and attributes with tears arising in the form of catharses or as part of shared sadness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716801 PMCID: PMC5055358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The degree of temperature change from one condition to another based on the coding of two independent raters.
| Contrast | Region | Rater 1 | Rater 2 | Rater 1 | Rater 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Cry vs. Baseline | Forehead | .15 | .16 | .55 | .55 |
| Peri-orbital | .40 | .40 | .10 | .10 | |
| Nose | .23 | .22 | -1.22 | -1.22 | |
| Chin | -.07 | -.07 | .55 | .56 | |
| Maxillary | -.06 | -.07 | -.09 | -.08 | |
| Cheek | .44 | .45 | .97 | .95 | |
| Crying vs. Pre-Cry | Forehead | .43 | .43 | .27 | .29 |
| Peri-orbital | .22 | .25 | .18 | .17 | |
| Nose | .50 | .45 | .66 | .66 | |
| Chin | .60 | .60 | .05 | .05 | |
| Maxillary | .35 | .35 | .34 | .40 | |
| Cheek | .16 | .16 | .27 | .29 |
Main effect analyses according to condition for each region of interest.*
| Region of interest | F value | df | p | ηp2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.37 | 1.24,12.37 | < .001 | .65 | |
| 81.11 | 1.13, 11.26 | < .01 | .89 | |
| 28.34 | 1.64,16.44 | < .001 | .74 | |
| 8.67 | 1.32, 31.23 | < .01 | .46 | |
| 7.06 | 1.24,12.40 | < .05 | .41 | |
| 4.39 | 1.73,17.36 | < .05 | .30 |
* df subject to Greenhouse Geisser where appropriate
Means and Standard Deviations of Regions of Interest as a Function of Condition.*
| Region | Condition | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline a | 34.62 | 1.48 | |
| Pre-Crying b | 34.87 | 1.39 | |
| Crying c | 35.23 | 1.30 | |
| Baseline a | 36.27 | 0.52 | |
| Pre-Crying a | 36.45 | 0.61 | |
| Crying a | 36.76 | 0.45 | |
| Baseline a | 31.68 | 4.03 | |
| Pre-Crying ab | 33.33 | 3.08 | |
| Crying 1 b | 34.70 | 2.28 | |
| Baseline a | 34.84 | 0.90 | |
| Pre-Crying b | 35.34 | 0.71 | |
| Crying b | 35.59 | 0.78 | |
| Baseline 1 a | 35.11 | 0.96 | |
| Pre-Crying b | 34.41 | 1.00 | |
| Crying c | 33.81 | 1.09 | |
| Baseline a | 33.96 | 1.09 | |
| Pre-Crying ab | 34.77 | 1.06 | |
| Crying b | 35.33 | 0.95 |
*Means that do not share a subscript are significantly different from one another (multiple comparisons used Sidak adjustment)
Fig 1Line graph: Development of temperature for each region of interest according to condition.
Fig 2Thermo-grams: Development of temperature throughout each condition (two pictures are provided for baseline, pre-crying and crying).
Mean Temperature Values for the Nose and Maxillary Area According to Time.
| Time | Nose-M | Nose-SD | Maxil.-M | Maxil.-SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 32.92 | 3.56 | 34.61 | 1.10 |
| 0.05 | 32.97 | 3.56 | 34.58 | 1.10 |
| 0.1 | 33.02 | 3.55 | 34.56 | 1.10 |
| 0.15 | 33.08 | 3.53 | 34.55 | 1.12 |
| 0.2 | 33.14 | 3.53 | 34.50 | 1.15 |
| 0.25 | 33.18 | 3.50 | 34.50 | 1.15 |
| 0.3 | 33.20 | 3.48 | 34.48 | 1.15 |
| 0.35 | 33.24 | 3.43 | 34.44 | 1.16 |
| 0.4 | 33.30 | 3.44 | 34.40 | 1.16 |
| 0.45 | 33.36 | 3.43 | 34.34 | 1.20 |
| 0.5 | 33.45 | 3.39 | 34.30 | 1.22 |
| 0.55 | 33.55 | 3.42 | 34.28 | 1.21 |
Mean scores and standard deviations for participant’s answers to each of the three questions according to their experience while watching the film.
| t(df) | p | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.95(12) | .001 | 4.61 | .65 | |
| 4.50(12) | .001 | 4.08 | .86 | |
| 2.99(12) | .011 | 3.77 | .93 |
Representation of the coding performed for each participant according to thematic group.
| . . .“Empathize” | ||
| . . .“Sympathetic towards the family” | ||
| . . .“Sympathy for the family” | ||
| . . .“Compassionate” | ||
| . . .“Empathy” | ||
| . . .“Felt sorry for Simba” | ||
| . . .“Empathetic towards the situation” | ||
| . . .“Reflective”. . .“Applied to something that happened in my life”. . .“In their shoes”. . .“Brought back old emotions” | ||
| . . .“Hard to imagine how hard it was” | ||
| . . .“How I would feel if it was my dog” | ||
| . . .“Could put myself in their shoes” Imagined it was my family” | ||
| . . .“Put film narrative to own life”. . .“What would I do in that situation” | ||
| . . .“Remembering similar experience”. . .“Losing family member due to cancer” | ||
| . . .“Relate to own personal life–reminds me of nans death “. . .“means a lot to me” | ||
| . . .“Put film into own situation-real life” | ||
| . . .“Felt refreshed”. . . .”Happy memories” | ||
| . . .“Sad”. . .“Film ‘touched’me-moved me”. . .“Emotionally sad” | ||
| . . .“Moving”. . .“Distressing” | ||
| . . .“Upsetting” | ||
| . . .“Emotional”. . .“Happy they were reunited” | ||
| . . . “Angry at Scar” | ||
| . . .“Upset”. . .“Overwhelmed with sadness” | ||
| . . .“Emotional film” | ||