| Literature DB >> 27716478 |
Timothy Price1, Tae Won Kim2, Jin Li3, Stefano Cascinu4, Paul Ruff5, Attili Satya Suresh6, Anne Thomas7, Sergei Tjulandin8, Xuesong Guan9, Marc Peeters10.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The primary analysis of the ASPECCT study demonstrated that panitumumab was non-inferior to cetuximab for overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here, we report the final analysis results of ASPECCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC who progressed on or were intolerant to irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomised to receive panitumumab 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or cetuximab (400 mg/m2) followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly. The primary end-point was OS assessed for non-inferiority. Patients were followed for survival for 24 months after the last patient was randomised and a final analysis was conducted. No formal hypothesis testing was done. Post hoc analyses of outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, worst-grade skin toxicity (0-1 versus 2-4) and worst-grade hypomagnesaemia (0 versus 1-4) were conducted.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-EGFR therapy; Colorectal cancer; Gastrointestinal cancer; Panitumumab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27716478 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162