Ritva Ahomäki1, Arja Harila-Saari2,3, Jaakko Matomäki4, Päivi M Lähteenmäki5. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence, Turku University Hospital, Tuijulankatu 24, 20540, Turku, Finland. rijohu@utu.fi. 2. Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence, Oulu University Hospital, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Turku, Finland. 4. The University of Turku, Turun Yliopisto, 20014, Turku, Finland. 5. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In order to assess neurocognitive and social outcomes after childhood cancer, we explored the educational and vocational attainments of Finnish survivors in comparison to matched population controls. METHODS: From national registries, we identified survivors (n = 3243) born from 1960 to 1992 and aged below 16 at cancer diagnosis (years 1964-2009) as well as their controls (n = 16,215). Data on educational achievements, yearly income, employment status, and retirement were retrieved from Statistics Finland. RESULTS: The median (range) age at study was 28 (17-50) years. The proportion of those with no education after comprehensive school was higher than controls for all the diagnostic groups: brain tumor (BT) (33.5 vs 23.0 %), solid tumor (ST) (25.0 vs 21.4 %), and leukemia/NHL (29.2 vs 23.1 %). Odds ratios (OR) for unemployment were not significantly elevated in any survivor group compared to controls, but OR for being retired was elevated in each survivor group (BT 14.8, ST 2.2, leukemia/NHL 4.0). Irradiation significantly increased that OR only in BT survivors. Leukemia/NHL survivors treated after 1992 had lower risk for early retirement (OR 0.6) compared to those diagnosed earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors had higher frequencies than controls for lacking further education after comprehensive school. Unemployment was not common, but risk for early retirement was significantly increased in each three survivor group. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Reassuring is that premature retirement was less common during the most recent treatment era. Screening and follow-up of psychosocial performance more effectively might be essential, and there is a need for studies on possibility for effective rehabilitation of the survivors.
BACKGROUND: In order to assess neurocognitive and social outcomes after childhood cancer, we explored the educational and vocational attainments of Finnish survivors in comparison to matched population controls. METHODS: From national registries, we identified survivors (n = 3243) born from 1960 to 1992 and aged below 16 at cancer diagnosis (years 1964-2009) as well as their controls (n = 16,215). Data on educational achievements, yearly income, employment status, and retirement were retrieved from Statistics Finland. RESULTS: The median (range) age at study was 28 (17-50) years. The proportion of those with no education after comprehensive school was higher than controls for all the diagnostic groups: brain tumor (BT) (33.5 vs 23.0 %), solid tumor (ST) (25.0 vs 21.4 %), and leukemia/NHL (29.2 vs 23.1 %). Odds ratios (OR) for unemployment were not significantly elevated in any survivor group compared to controls, but OR for being retired was elevated in each survivor group (BT 14.8, ST 2.2, leukemia/NHL 4.0). Irradiation significantly increased that OR only in BT survivors. Leukemia/NHL survivors treated after 1992 had lower risk for early retirement (OR 0.6) compared to those diagnosed earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors had higher frequencies than controls for lacking further education after comprehensive school. Unemployment was not common, but risk for early retirement was significantly increased in each three survivor group. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Reassuring is that premature retirement was less common during the most recent treatment era. Screening and follow-up of psychosocial performance more effectively might be essential, and there is a need for studies on possibility for effective rehabilitation of the survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Childhood; Education; Registry based study; Survivor
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Wilburn E Reddick; Joshua Luxton; John O Glass; Noah D Sabin; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Maria Lorenzi; Amy J McMillan; Linda S Siegel; Bruno D Zumbo; Victor Glickman; John J Spinelli; Karen J Goddard; Sheila L Pritchard; Paul C Rogers; Mary L McBride Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marcos Di Pinto; Heather M Conklin; Chenghong Li; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jenny W Y Pang; Debra L Friedman; John A Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Ann C Mertens; Leslie L Robison; Noel S Weiss Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Fiona Schulte; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Barbara A Olson-Bullis; Pia Banerjee; Matthew C Hocking; Laura Janzen; Lisa S Kahalley; Hayley Wroot; Caitlin Forbes; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Fredrik Baecklund; Kristina A E Alexanderson; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Lingjing Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie A Devine; Salome Christen; Renée L Mulder; Morven C Brown; Lisa M Ingerski; Luzius Mader; Emma J Potter; Charlotte Sleurs; Adrienne S Viola; Susanna Waern; Louis S Constine; Melissa M Hudson; Leontien C M Kremer; Roderick Skinner; Gisela Michel; Jordan Gilleland Marchak; Fiona S M Schulte Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Tiina M Remes; Emma Hovén; Niina Ritari; Heli Pohjasniemi; Riina Puosi; Pekka M Arikoski; Mikko O Arola; Päivi M Lähteenmäki; Tuula R I Lönnqvist; Marja K Ojaniemi; V Pekka Riikonen; Kirsti H Sirkiä; Satu Winqvist; Heikki M J Rantala; Marika Harila; Arja H Harila-Saari Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-01-22