Literature DB >> 27714486

Optimized workflow and imaging protocols for whole-body oncologic PET/MRI.

Shirou Ishii1, Takamitsu Hara2, Takeyuki Nanbu2, Hiroki Suenaga3, Shigeyasu Sugawara3, Daichi Kuroiwa3, Hirofumi Sekino3, Masayuki Miyajima3, Hitoshi Kubo2, Noboru Oriuchi2, Hiroshi Ito3.   

Abstract

Although PET/MRI has the advantages of a simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI, high soft-tissue contrast of the MRI images, and reduction of radiation exposure, its low profitability and long acquisition time are significant problems in clinical settings. Thus, MRI protocols that meet oncological purposes need to be used in order to reduce examination time while securing detectability. Currently, half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo and 3D-T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination may be the most commonly used sequences for whole-body imaging due to their shorter acquisition time and higher diagnostic accuracy. Although there have been several reports that adding diffusion weighted image (DWI) to PET/MRI protocol has had no effect on tumor detection to date, in cases of liver, kidney, bladder, and prostate cancer, the use of DWI may be beneficial in detecting lesions. Another possible option is to scan each region with different MRI sequences instead of scanning the whole body using one sequence continuously. We herein report a workflow and imaging protocols for whole-body oncologic PET/MRI using an integrated system in the clinical routine, designed for the detection, for example by cancer screening, of metastatic lesions, in order to help future users optimize their workflow and imaging protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncology; PET/MRI; Whole-body; Workflow

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27714486     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-016-0584-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of integrated whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT: Is PET/MR alternative to PET/CT in routine clinical oncology?

Authors:  Shirou Ishii; Daisuke Shimao; Takamitsu Hara; Masayuki Miyajima; Ken Kikuchi; Masashi Takawa; Kensuke Kumamoto; Hiroshi Ito; Fumio Shishido
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Qualitative and quantitative comparison of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging in clinical practice.

Authors:  Khalsa Z Al-Nabhani; Rizwan Syed; Sofia Michopoulou; Jokha Alkalbani; Asim Afaq; Emmanouil Panagiotidis; Celia O'Meara; Ashley Groves; Peter Ell; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  N staging of lung cancer patients with PET/MRI using a three-segment model attenuation correction algorithm: initial experience.

Authors:  A A Kohan; J A Kolthammer; J L Vercher-Conejero; C Rubbert; S Partovi; R Jones; K A Herrmann; P Faulhaber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Workflow and scan protocol considerations for integrated whole-body PET/MRI in oncology.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Matthias Eiber; Stephan G Nekolla; Michael Souvatzoglou; Alexander Drzezga; Sibylle Ziegler; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Whole-body simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)-MR: optimization and adaptation of MRI sequences.

Authors:  Kathryn J Fowler; Jon McConathy; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Workflow Considerations in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Gustav K von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Natalie Chuck; Cristina Rossi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi; Gustav von Schulthess; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR screening.

Authors:  Joan C Vilanova; Joaquim Barceló
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Verena Hartung-Knemeyer; Karsten J Beiderwellen; Christian Buchbender; Hilmar Kuehl; Thomas C Lauenstein; Andreas Bockisch; Thorsten D Poeppel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Jie; Liu Rongbo; Tan Ping
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  MR Imaging in the 21st Century: Technical Innovation over the First Two Decades.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kabasawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.760

2.  A Practical Approach to Optimize Scan Protocol for Simultaneous Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cancer Staging.

Authors:  Amarnath Jena; Sangeeta Taneja; Pradeep Negi; Aru Singh; Chitranjan Kumar; Vinay Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.