Rose Khavari1, Cindy Gu2, Anastasia C Tran3, Robert Chan1. 1. Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Urology, Houston, TX, United States. 2. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States. 3. Texas A&M Medical School, Bryan, TX, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether listening to patient-selected music during urodynamic study (UDS) reduced pain and anxiety while increasing overall patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure. METHODS:Fifty-one (51) patients who underwent UDS from March to July 2014 were randomized into two groups: Group 1 with patient-selected music during the procedure (n=27) and Group 2 without music (n=24). Standard multichannel filling cystometry was performed. Anxiety was self-assessed using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, while overall pain, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo the procedure again were self-measured using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and reasons for testing were similar between the two groups. The state score for Groups 1 and 2 were 27.04 and 29.5, respectively (p=0.3225) and 31.78 and 33.86, respectively (p=0.4970) for the trait score. The mean pain scores were 1.04 and 1.57, respectively (p=0.2047); the mean satisfaction scores were 0.65 and 0.52, respectively (p=0.8169); and the scores for willingness to undergo the procedure again were 0.77 and 0.74, respectively (p=0.9442). While there were no significant differences between the two groups in anxiety and satisfaction scores, pain, and willingness to undergo the procedure again, both groups commented on the nurse as the most important factor in their overall comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Music during UDS did not appear to lower pain and anxiety, nor increase overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure. The most important aspect in alleviating patients' pain and anxiety was the person actually performing the testing, highlighting the importance of having trained and dedicated staff.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether listening to patient-selected music during urodynamic study (UDS) reduced pain and anxiety while increasing overall patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure. METHODS: Fifty-one (51) patients who underwent UDS from March to July 2014 were randomized into two groups: Group 1 with patient-selected music during the procedure (n=27) and Group 2 without music (n=24). Standard multichannel filling cystometry was performed. Anxiety was self-assessed using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, while overall pain, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo the procedure again were self-measured using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and reasons for testing were similar between the two groups. The state score for Groups 1 and 2 were 27.04 and 29.5, respectively (p=0.3225) and 31.78 and 33.86, respectively (p=0.4970) for the trait score. The mean pain scores were 1.04 and 1.57, respectively (p=0.2047); the mean satisfaction scores were 0.65 and 0.52, respectively (p=0.8169); and the scores for willingness to undergo the procedure again were 0.77 and 0.74, respectively (p=0.9442). While there were no significant differences between the two groups in anxiety and satisfaction scores, pain, and willingness to undergo the procedure again, both groups commented on the nurse as the most important factor in their overall comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Music during UDS did not appear to lower pain and anxiety, nor increase overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure. The most important aspect in alleviating patients' pain and anxiety was the person actually performing the testing, highlighting the importance of having trained and dedicated staff.
Authors: J M López-Cepero Andrada; A Amaya Vidal; T Castro Aguilar-Tablada; I García Reina; López Silva; A Ruiz Guinaldo; J Larrauri De la Rosa; I Herrero Cibaja; A Ferré Alamo; A Benítez Roldán Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: Mitchell M Conover; Michele Jonsson Funk; Alan C Kinlaw; AnnaMarie Connolly; Jennifer M Wu Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Hsiu F Tsai; Ying R Chen; Min H Chung; Yuan M Liao; Mei J Chi; Chia C Chang; Kuei R Chou Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Maurizio Serati; Andrea Braga; Peter F W M Rosier; Stefan de Wachter; Alan Uren; Enrico Finazzi-Agrò Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 2.367