Literature DB >> 27713422

Diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in pedunculated polyps in daily clinical practice: a multicenter study.

Yara Backes1, Leon Mg Moons1, Marco R Novelli2, Jeroen D van Bergeijk3, John N Groen4, Tom Cj Seerden5, Matthijs P Schwartz6, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel7, Bernhard Wm Spanier8, Joost Mj Geesing9, Koen Kessels10, Marjon Kerkhof11, Peter D Siersema1,12, G Johan A Offerhaus13, Anya N Milne14, Miangela M Lacle13.   

Abstract

T1 colorectal cancer can be mimicked by pseudo-invasion in pedunculated polyps. British guidelines are currently one of the few which recommend diagnostic confirmation of T1 colorectal cancer by a second pathologist. The aim of this study was to provide insights into the accuracy of histological diagnosis of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice. A sample of 128 cases diagnosed as pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2014 from 10 Dutch hospitals was selected for histological review. Firstly, two Dutch expert gastrointestinal pathologists reviewed all hematoxylin-eosin stained slides. In 20 cases the diagnosis T1 colorectal cancer was not confirmed (20/128; 16%). The discordant cases were subsequently discussed with a third Dutch gastrointestinal pathologist and a consensus diagnosis was agreed. The revised diagnoses were pseudo-invasion in 10 cases (10/128; 8%), high-grade dysplasia in 4 cases (4/128; 3%), and equivocal in 6 cases (6/128; 5%). To further validate the consensus diagnosis, the discordant cases were reviewed by an independent expert pathologist from the United Kingdom. A total of 39 cases were reviewed blindly including the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis and 19 control cases where the Dutch expert panel agreed with the original reporting pathologists diagnosis. In 19 of the 20 cases with a revised diagnosis the British pathologist agreed that T1 colorectal cancer could not be confirmed. Additionally, amongst the 19 control cases the British pathologist was unable to confirm T1 colorectal cancer in a further 4 cases and was equivocal in 3 cases. In conclusion, both generalist and expert pathologists experience diagnostic difficulty distinguishing pseudo-invasion and high-grade dysplasia from T1 colorectal cancer. In order to prevent overtreatment, review of the histology of pedunculated T1 colorectal cancers by a second pathologist should be considered with discussion of these cases at a multidisciplinary meeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27713422     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  27 in total

1.  Epithelial misplacement in the muscularis propria after biopsy of a colonic adenoma.

Authors:  Gaetano Magro; Giuseppe Aprile; Giuseppe Vallone; Paolo Greco
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Utility of MMP-1, p53, E-cadherin, and collagen IV immunohistochemical stains in the differential diagnosis of adenomas with misplaced epithelium versus adenomas with invasive adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Rhonda K Yantiss; Marcus W Bosenberg; Donald A Antonioli; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Harris; David N Lewin; Hanlin L Wang; Gregory Y Lauwers; Amitabh Srivastava; Yu Shyr; Bashar Shakhtour; Frank Revetta; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  Bowel cancer screening-generated diagnostic conundrum of the century: pseudoinvasion in sigmoid colonic polyps.

Authors:  Neil A Shepherd; Rebecca K L Griggs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  The expression of p53, Ki-67 and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in colorectal adenomas with true invasion and pseudoinvasion.

Authors:  T P Hansen; C Fenger; O Kronborg
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Colorectal Cancer Resections in the Oldest Old Between 2011 and 2012 in The Netherlands.

Authors:  N M Verweij; A H W Schiphorst; H A Maas; D D E Zimmerman; F van den Bos; A Pronk; I H M Borel Rinkes; M E Hamaker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps: clinicopathologic correlations.

Authors:  H S Cooper; L M Deppisch; W K Gourley; E I Kahn; R Lev; P N Manley; R R Pascal; A H Qizilbash; R R Rickert; J F Silverman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer prevention in Europe: burden of disease and status of screening programs.

Authors:  E Altobelli; A Lattanzi; R Paduano; G Varassi; F di Orio
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors predicting occurrence and therapeutic choice in malignant colorectal polyps: a study of 13 years of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Sergiu Marian Cazacu; Adrian Săftoiu; Sevastiţa Iordache; Mirela Corina Ghiluşi; Claudia Valentina Georgescu; Vlad Florin Iovănescu; Carmen Daniela Neagoe; Liliana Streba; Mihaela Caliţa; Elena Daniela Burtea; Dan Cârţu; Polliana Mihaela Leru
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

2.  Segmentation and Grade Prediction of Colon Cancer Digital Pathology Images Across Multiple Institutions.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Muhammad Aksam Iftikhar; Ahmad Chaddad; Tamim Niazi; Thomas Karasic; Michel Bilello
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.