| Literature DB >> 27711408 |
Robert C Dunbar1, Jonathan Martens2, Giel Berden2, Jos Oomens3.
Abstract
The observed variety of metal-ion complexation sites offered by peptides reflects a basic tension between charge solvation of the ion by Lewis-basic chelating groups versus amide nitrogen deprotonation and formation of metal-nitrogen bonds. Gas-phase models of metal-ion coordination can illuminate the factors governing this choice in condensed-phase proteins and enzymes. Here, structures of gas-phase complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with tri- and tetra-peptide ligands are mapped out using a combination of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) computations. The two binding modes give distinctive IRMPD signatures, particularly in the diagnostic region 1500-1550 cm-1. Previous observations have suggested that Ni(ii) complexes preferentially show the iminol rearrangement pattern (Im) giving low-spin square-planar geometries with metal-ion bonds to deprotonated amide nitrogens. In contrast, alkaline earth metal ion complexes prefer amide carbonyl oxygens chelating the metal ion with pyramidal geometry (charge-solvation, CS). Surprisingly, it is shown here that the Gly4 complexes are CS bound, in contrast with the expectation of Im binding. It is suggested that CS binding is actually a normal Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) binding mode to simple peptides lacking participating side chains. Three factors are suggested to influence the choice between CS and Im binding patterns: (1) presence of an accessible side-chain Lewis-basic proton interaction site (FGGF, FGG and HAA complexes); (2) short chain length of the peptide leading to a shortage of accessible carbonyl oxygen sites for CS binding, (AAA, FGG and HAA complexes); (3) outright deprotonation of the ligand giving net negatively charged Im[Ni2+(Gly4-3H+)]- and Im[Ni2+(Ala3-3H+)]- complexes, which have a triply-deprotonated ligand. IRMPD spectra of [Cu2+Gly4]2+ and [Cu2+(Gly4-3H+)]- complexes suggest that their structures are similar to their Ni2+ analogs.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27711408 DOI: 10.1039/c6cp03974j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys ISSN: 1463-9076 Impact factor: 3.676