Literature DB >> 27706888

On the interpretation of electron microscopic maps of biological macromolecules.

Jimin Wang1, Peter B Moore1,2.   

Abstract

The images of flash-frozen biological macromolecules produced by cryo-electron microscopy (EM) can be used to generate accurate, three-dimensional, electric potential maps for these molecules that resemble X-ray-derived electron density maps. However, unlike electron density maps, electric potential maps can include negative features that might for example represent the negatively charged, backbone phosphate groups of nucleic acids or protein carboxylate side chains, which can complicate their interpretation. This study examines the images of groups that include charged atoms that appear in recently-published, high-resolution EM potential maps of the ribosome and β-galactosidase. Comparisons of simulated maps of these same groups with their experimental counterparts highlight the impact that charge has on the appearance of electric potential maps.
© 2016 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray scattering; electric potential; electron atomic scattering factor; electron density; electron microscopy; electron scattering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27706888      PMCID: PMC5192980          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  25 in total

1.  How good can cryo-EM become?

Authors:  Robert M Glaeser
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Specific chemical and structural damage to proteins produced by synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  M Weik; R B Ravelli; G Kryger; S McSweeney; M L Raves; M Harel; P Gros; I Silman; J Kroon; J L Sussman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Electron crystallography of ultrathin 3D protein crystals: atomic model with charges.

Authors:  Koji Yonekura; Kazuyuki Kato; Mitsuo Ogasawara; Masahiro Tomita; Chikashi Toyoshima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Atomic model of plant light-harvesting complex by electron crystallography.

Authors:  W Kühlbrandt; D N Wang; Y Fujiyoshi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin.

Authors:  N Grigorieff; T A Ceska; K H Downing; J M Baldwin; R Henderson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-06-14       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structure of the E. coli ribosome-EF-Tu complex at <3 Å resolution by Cs-corrected cryo-EM.

Authors:  Niels Fischer; Piotr Neumann; Andrey L Konevega; Lars V Bock; Ralf Ficner; Marina V Rodnina; Holger Stark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 A resolution based on electron crystallography: implication of the charge distribution.

Authors:  K Mitsuoka; T Hirai; K Murata; A Miyazawa; A Kidera; Y Kimura; Y Fujiyoshi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-02-26       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  2.8-Å Cryo-EM Structure of the Large Ribosomal Subunit from the Eukaryotic Parasite Leishmania.

Authors:  Moran Shalev-Benami; Yan Zhang; Donna Matzov; Yehuda Halfon; Arie Zackay; Haim Rozenberg; Ella Zimmerman; Anat Bashan; Charles L Jaffe; Ada Yonath; Georgios Skiniotis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 9.  Overview and future of single particle electron cryomicroscopy.

Authors:  Richard Henderson
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  CryoEM at IUCrJ: a new era.

Authors:  Sriram Subramaniam; Werner Kühlbrandt; Richard Henderson
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.769

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis.

Authors:  Dmitry Lyumkis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  On the appearance of carboxylates in electrostatic potential maps.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis.

Authors:  Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Elaine C Meng; Eric F Pettersen; Gregory S Couch; John H Morris; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Systematic analysis of residual density suggests that a major limitation in well-refined X-ray structures of proteins is the omission of ordered solvent.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  On contribution of known atomic partial charges of protein backbone in electrostatic potential density maps.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Effects of aligned α-helix peptide dipoles on experimental electrostatic potentials.

Authors:  Jimin Wang; Pablo E Videla; Victor S Batista
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Experimental charge density from electron microscopic maps.

Authors:  Jimin Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  On the relationship between cumulative correlation coefficients and the quality of crystallographic data sets.

Authors:  Jimin Wang; Gary W Brudvig; Victor S Batista; Peter B Moore
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  X-rays in the Cryo-Electron Microscopy Era: Structural Biology's Dynamic Future.

Authors:  Susannah C Shoemaker; Nozomi Ando
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Electron Diffraction of 3D Molecular Crystals.

Authors:  Ambarneil Saha; Shervin S Nia; José A Rodríguez
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 72.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.