Literature DB >> 277066

The short face syndrome.

H Opdebeeck, W H Bell.   

Abstract

Cephalograms of twenty-seven untreated adult Caucasians, selected on the basis of a clinical impression of reduced lower facial height, were studied. Various linear and angular measurements were studied and compared to the Bolton standards. The short face syndrome SFS is a clinically recognizable facial type with reduced lower facial height as the common denominator. On the basis of the FPI (facial proportion index), the RH (ramus height), the OP-PP distance (or posterior maxillary height), and the SN:MP angle, two subgroups were distinguished in the SFS group. SFS, was characterized by a long ramus, sharply reduced SN:MP angle, an FPI close to 10, and a slightly reduced posterior maxillary height. In contrast, SFS2 was characterized by a short ramus, a slightly reduced SN:MP angle, an FPI with values around or below zero, and a sharply reduced posterior maxillary height. The latter group was designated as vertical maxillary deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 277066     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  16 in total

1.  Relationship of maxilla to cranial base in different facial types-a cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  Tarun Rana; Rohit Khanna; Tripti Tikku; Kiran Sachan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Apr

2.  [The treatment of deep bite in adults].

Authors:  U Hirschfelder; K Hertrich
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-02

3.  [Cephalometric study of 253 cases of neutrocclusion and the dynamics of suborbital face height and mid-face height].

Authors:  R Roth
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1982-08

4.  Palatal plane inclination on vertical growth pattern among Indians.

Authors:  Seerab Husain; Arvind Sivakumar; Sri Rengalakshmi
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Sukru Enhos; Tancan Uysal; Ahmet Yagci; İlknur Veli; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Törün Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Lower incisor inclination changes during Xbow treatment according to vertical facial type.

Authors:  Carlos Flores-Mir; Arden Young; Amira Greiss; Matthew Woynorowski; James Peng
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Nahoum Index in Brachyfacial Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Chiara Vompi; Roberto Vernucci; Ambra Maria Costantini; Valentina Mazzoli; Gabriella Galluccio; Alessandro Silvestri
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-20

8.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.

Authors:  Roberto Rongo; Joseph Saswat Antoun; Yi Xin Lim; George Dias; Rosa Valletta; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.

Authors:  Anthony Tannous Macari; Antoine Elias Hanna
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited.

Authors:  Cécile Gütermann; Timo Peltomäki; Goran Markic; Michael Hänggi; Marc Schätzle; Luca Signorelli; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.