| Literature DB >> 27705943 |
Juan Ji1,2,3, Yufeng Qin4, Rong Wang5, Zhenyao Huang1,2, Yan Zhang1,2, Ran Zhou1,2, Ling Song1,2, Xiufeng Ling3, Zhibin Hu1,6, Dengshun Miao1,5, Hongbing Shen1,6, Yankai Xia1,2, Xinru Wang1,2, Chuncheng Lu1,2.
Abstract
Male factor infertility affects one-sixth of couples worldwide, and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is one of the most severe forms. In recent years there has been increasing evidence to implicate the participation of X chromosome in the process of spermatogenesis. To uncover the roles of X-linked multi-copy genes in spermatogenesis, we performed systematic analysis of X-linked gene copy number variations (CNVs) and Y chromosome haplogrouping in 447 idiopathic NOA patients and 485 healthy controls. Interestingly, the frequency of individuals with abnormal level copy of Variable charge, X-linked (VCX) was significantly different between cases and controls after multiple test correction (p = 5.10 × 10-5). To discriminate the effect of gain/loss copies in these genes, we analyzed the frequency of X-linked multi-copy genes in subjects among subdivided groups. Our results demonstrated that individuals with increased copy numbers of Nuclear RNA export factor 2 (NXF2) (p = 9.21 × 10-8) and VCX (p = 1.97 × 10-4) conferred the risk of NOA. In vitro analysis demonstrated that increasing copy number of VCX could upregulate the gene expression and regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Our study establishes a robust association between the VCX CNVs and NOA risk.Entities:
Keywords: copy number variations; non-obstructive azoospermia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27705943 PMCID: PMC5340235 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Main characteristics and clinical parameters of study subjects
| Variables | Controls ( | Cases ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) [mean ± SD] | 30.1 ± 4.7 | 29.5 ± 5.0 |
| Smoking Status [ | ||
| Never Smokers | 329 (68%) | 318 (71%) |
| Ever Smokers | 156 (32%) | 129 (29%) |
| Alcohol consumption [ | ||
| Never drinkers | 332 (68%) | 313 (70%) |
| Ever drinkers | 153 (32%) | 134 (30%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) [mean ± SD] | 24.3 ± 3.2 | 23.3 ± 3.0 |
P < 0.05 for Student's t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test for selected characteristics distributions between the control and case groups.
Distributions of CSAG, CTAG, CT45, FAM47, H2AFB1, NXF2 and VCX gene copy numbers in subjects
| Genea | Fertile Controls (485) | Infertile Cases (447) | OR(95%CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common level copies | Abnormal level copies | Common level copies | Abnormal level copies | |||
| 470 (96.91) | 15 (3.09) | 423 (94.63) | 24 (5.37) | 1.78 (0.92−3.43) | 8.29× 10−2 | |
| 198 (40.82) | 287 (59.18) | 162 (36.24) | 285 (63.76) | 1.21 (0.93−1.58) | 1.51× 10−1 | |
| 467 (96.29) | 18 (3.71) | 430 (96.20) | 17 (3.80) | 1.03 (0.52, 2.02) | 9.41× 10−2 | |
| 473 (97.53) | 12 (2.47) | 444 (99.33) | 3 (0.67) | 0.27 (0.07, 0.95) | 2.89× 10−2 | |
| 462 (95.26) | 23 (4.74) | 414 (92.62) | 33 (7.38) | 1.60 (0.93, 2.77) | 9.02× 10−2 | |
| 475 (97.94) | 10 (2.06) | 425 (95.08) | 22 (4.92) | 2.46 (1.15−5.25) | 1.66× 10−2 | |
| 456 (94.02) | 29 (5.98) | 385 (86.13) | 62 (13.87) | 2.53 (1.60, 4.02) | 5.10× 10−5 | |
P value retained after multiple test correction.
The distribution of copy number variation of selected X chromosome multicopy genes in the azoospermia and normozoospermia groups
| Gene | CNV | Azoospermia (447) | Normozoospermia (485) | Codominant Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | OR | |||||
| Common level copy(4) | 423 | 94.63 | 470 | 96.91 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 3 | 0.67 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 1.07× 10−2 | |
| More than common level | 21 | 4.70 | 15 | 3.09 | 1.56 (0.79−3.06) | 2.00× 10−1 | |
| Common level copy(6) | 162 | 36.24 | 198 | 40.82 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 156 | 34.90 | 144 | 29.69 | 1.32 (0.97−1.80) | 7.30× 10−2 | |
| More than common level | 129 | 28.86 | 143 | 29.48 | 1.10 (0.80−1.51) | 5.45× 10−1 | |
| Common level copy(3) | 430 | 96.20 | 467 | 96.29 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 1.00 | |
| More than common level | 17 | 3.80 | 18 | 3.71 | 1.03 (0.52−2.02) | 9.41× 10−1 | |
| Common level copy(2) | 444 | 99.33 | 473 | 97.53 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 1.00 | |
| More than common level | 3 | 0.67 | 12 | 2.47 | 0.27 (0.75−0.95) | 4.10× 10−2 | |
| Common level copy(3) | 414 | 92.62 | 462 | 95.26 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 2 | 0.45 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 2.24× 10−1 | |
| More than common level | 31 | 6.94 | 23 | 4.74 | 1.50 (0.86−2.62) | 1.50× 10−1 | |
| Common level copy(4) | 425 | 95.08 | 475 | 97.94 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 0 | 0.00 | 10 | 2.06 | - | 2.20× 10−3 | |
| More than common level | 22 | 4.92 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 9.27× 10−8 | |
| Common level copy(4) | 385 | 86.13 | 456 | 94.02 | - | - | |
| Less than common level | 6 | 1.34 | 2 | 0.41 | 3.55 (0.71−17.71) | 1.22× 10−1 | |
| More than common level | 56 | 12.53 | 27 | 5.57 | 2.46 (1.52−3.97) | 1.97 × 10−4 | |
Figure 1Effect of VCX on cell apoptosis, cell proliferation and cell cycle in 293T cells
(A, B) Assessment of cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. Cells in the Q2 and Q4 quadrant were late apoptotic and early apoptotic, respectively. (C) The percentage of apoptotic cells (Q2 + Q4) was presented in histogram and there was significant up-regulation of cell apoptosis in 293T cells transfected with VCX. (D) Cell growth activity was markedly inhibited. (E, F) representative histogram depicting cell-cycle profiles of control group and VCX group, respectively. (G) Various phases of the cell cycle was showed and there was no significant difference between the two groups, Each data point represented the mean ± SE from three separate experiments in which treatments were performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of VCX on cell apoptosis, cell proliferation and cell cycle in GC-1 cells
(A, B) Representative histogram depicting cell apoptosis profiles of indicated cells in control group and VCX group, respectively. (C) The percentage of apoptotic cells was increased significantly in GC-1 cells transfected with VCX. (D) Cell proliferation was markedly inhibited. (E, F) Data of the experiment were expressed as a percentage of total cells. Results quantitated in cell cycle were shown in (G) respectively. Each data point represented the mean ± SE from three separate experiments in which treatments were performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 3Effect of VCX on cell apoptosis, cell proliferation and cell cycle in GC-2 cells
(A, B, C) There was no significant difference in cell apoptosis between control group and VCX group. (D) Cell proliferation was markedly down-regulated in VCX group. (E, F, G) Cell counts in S-phase of cell cycle were markedly reduced in VCX group. Each data point represented the mean ± SE from three separate experiments in which treatments were performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05.