Literature DB >> 27705084

Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis.

Anthony C Gordon1, Gavin D Perkins1, Mervyn Singer1, Daniel F McAuley1, Robert M L Orme1, Shalini Santhakumaran1, Alexina J Mason1, Mary Cross1, Farah Al-Beidh1, Janis Best-Lane1, David Brealey1, Christopher L Nutt1, James J McNamee1, Henrik Reschreiter1, Andrew Breen1, Kathleen D Liu1, Deborah Ashby1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is a calcium-sensitizing drug with inotropic and other properties that may improve outcomes in patients with sepsis.
METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized clinical trial to investigate whether levosimendan reduces the severity of organ dysfunction in adults with sepsis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a blinded infusion of levosimendan (at a dose of 0.05 to 0.2 μg per kilogram of body weight per minute) for 24 hours or placebo in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was the mean daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the intensive care unit up to day 28 (scores for each of five systems range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe dysfunction; maximum score, 20). Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, time to weaning from mechanical ventilation, and adverse events.
RESULTS: The trial recruited 516 patients; 259 were assigned to receive levosimendan and 257 to receive placebo. There was no significant difference in the mean (±SD) SOFA score between the levosimendan group and the placebo group (6.68±3.96 vs. 6.06±3.89; mean difference, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 1.29; P=0.053). Mortality at 28 days was 34.5% in the levosimendan group and 30.9% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 3.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.5 to 11.7; P=0.43). Among patients requiring ventilation at baseline, those in the levosimendan group were less likely than those in the placebo group to be successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation over the period of 28 days (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.97; P=0.03). More patients in the levosimendan group than in the placebo group had supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (3.1% vs. 0.4%; absolute difference, 2.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.3; P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of levosimendan to standard treatment in adults with sepsis was not associated with less severe organ dysfunction or lower mortality. Levosimendan was associated with a lower likelihood of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation and a higher risk of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. (Funded by the NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme and others; LeoPARDS Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN12776039 .).

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27705084     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  87 in total

Review 1.  Heart failure and sepsis: practical recommendations for the optimal management.

Authors:  Angelos Arfaras-Melainis; Eftihia Polyzogopoulou; Filippos Triposkiadis; Andrew Xanthopoulos; Ignatios Ikonomidis; Alexander Mebazaa; John Parissis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Levosimendan in septic shock in patients with biochemical evidence of cardiac dysfunction: a subgroup analysis of the LeoPARDS randomised trial.

Authors:  David B Antcliffe; Shalini Santhakumaran; Robert M L Orme; Josie K Ward; Farah Al-Beidh; Kieran O'Dea; Gavin D Perkins; Mervyn Singer; Daniel F McAuley; Alexina J Mason; Mary Cross; Deborah Ashby; Anthony C Gordon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Jeffrey Lipman; Flavia Machado; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Marlies Ostermann; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  [Levosimendan-no effect on multiorgan failure in septic shock].

Authors:  U Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  Critical care nephrology in 2016: Managing organ dysfunction in critical care.

Authors:  Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Life ain't no SOFA-considerations after yet another failed clinical sepsis trial.

Authors:  David Berger; Joerg C Schefold
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Prevention of organ dysfunction in septic shock: still looking for an effective treatment.

Authors:  Giovanni Landoni; Alessandro Belletti; Alessandro Putzu; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  A global perspective on vasoactive agents in shock.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Daniel de Backer; Bin DU; Anthony C Gordon; Glenn Hernández; Keith M Olsen; Tiffany M Osborn; Sandra Peake; James A Russell; Sergio Zanotti Cavazzoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  [Cardiogenic shock : Current evidence].

Authors:  H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Non-antiarrhythmic interventions in new onset and paroxysmal sepsis-related atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; John Boyd
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.