Karoline G Primdahl1,2, Marius Aursnes1, Mary E Walker2, Romain A Colas2, Charles N Serhan3, Jesmond Dalli2, Trond V Hansen1, Anders Vik1. 1. School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Oslo , P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. 2. William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , Charterhouse Square, London, UK , EC1M 6BQ. 3. Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Abstract
Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators are biosynthesized during the resolution phase of acute inflammation from n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Recently, the isolation and identification of the four novel mediators denoted 13-series resolvins, namely, RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3) and RvT4 (4), were reported, which showed potent bioactions characteristic for specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators. Herein, based on results from LC/MS-MS metabololipidomics and the stereoselective synthesis of 13(R)-hydroxy-7Z,10Z,13R,14E,16Z,19Z docosapentaenoic acid (13R-HDPA, 5), we provide direct evidence that the four novel mediators 1-4 are all biosynthesized from the pivotal intermediate 5. The UV and LC/MS-MS results from synthetic 13R-HDPA (5) matched those from endogenously and biosynthetically produced material obtained from in vivo infectious exudates, endothelial cells, and human recombinant COX-2 enzyme. Stereochemically pure 5 was obtained with the use of a chiral pool starting material that installed the configuration at the C-13 atom as R. Two stereoselective Z-Wittig reactions and two Z-selective reductions of internal alkynes afforded the geometrically pure alkene moieties in 5. Incubation of 5 with isolated human neutrophils gave all four RvTs. The results presented herein provide new knowledge on the biosynthetic pathways and the enzymatic origin of RvTs 1-4.
Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators are biosynthesized during the resolution phase of acute inflammation from n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Recently, the isolation and identification of the four novel mediators denoted 13-series resolvins, namely, RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3) and RvT4 (4), were reported, which showed potent bioactions characteristic for specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators. Herein, based on results from LC/MS-MS metabololipidomics and the stereoselective synthesis of 13(R)-hydroxy-7Z,10Z,13R,14E,16Z,19Z docosapentaenoic acid (13R-HDPA, 5), we provide direct evidence that the four novel mediators 1-4 are all biosynthesized from the pivotal intermediate 5. The UV and LC/MS-MS results from synthetic 13R-HDPA (5) matched those from endogenously and biosynthetically produced material obtained from in vivo infectious exudates, endothelial cells, and human recombinant COX-2 enzyme. Stereochemically pure 5 was obtained with the use of a chiral pool starting material that installed the configuration at the C-13 atom as R. Two stereoselective Z-Wittig reactions and two Z-selective reductions of internal alkynes afforded the geometrically pure alkene moieties in 5. Incubation of 5 with isolated human neutrophils gave all four RvTs. The results presented herein provide new knowledge on the biosynthetic pathways and the enzymatic origin of RvTs 1-4.
During the
resolution of acute
inflammation, a novel group of host-protective chemical mediators
biosynthesized from the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) eicosapentaenoic
acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), termed specialized pro-resolving
mediators (SPMs)[1] and their bioactive peptide-conjugates,[2] are resolution mediators and control tissue regeneration
and promote the return to homeostasis.[3,4] The resolvins,
protectins, and maresins constitute individual families of SPMs that
are formed via distinct biosynthetic pathways.[4] During the resolution of acute inflammation, SPMs exhibit a wide
range of potent pro-resolving actions, which include promoting the
clearance of bacteria and apoptotic cells, counter-regulating the
production and actions of pro-inflammatory mediators, and stimulating
the resolution of inflammation.[5] The PUFAn-3 docosapentaenoic acid (n-3 DPA) is an intermediate in the biosynthesis
of DHA from EPA and is also a precursor to novel bioactive mediators.[6−8] The isolation and structure elucidation of four new host-protective
molecules was recently reported. These compounds were termed 13-series
resolvins (RvTs), namely, RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3) and RvT4 (4), given that they
share a hydroxy functionality at carbon 13.[8]These four enzymatically oxygenated products are
biosynthesized
during neutrophil-endothelial cocultures and are present, after sterile
inflammation as well as infection, in both human and mouse tissues.
These four new natural products are biosynthesized from n-3 DPA during
neutrophil-endothelial interactions where endothelial cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2) converts n-3 docosapentaenoic acid to 13-hydro(peroxy)-7Z,10Z,13,14E,16Z,19Z docosapentaenoic acid that is then
thought to react rapidly, via COX-2-mediated peroxidase activity,
into 13(R)-hydroxy-7Z,10Z,13R,14E,16Z,19Z docosapentaenoic acid (Scheme ).[8] The RvTs contain
conjugated diene and triene moieties, as well as isolated Z-olefins, in addition to the common hydroxy functionality
at C-13. The RvT family of mediators demonstrated potent protective
actions increasing mice survival during Escherichia
coli (E. coli) infections,
and regulate human and mouse phagocyte responses that result in increased
bacterial phagocytosis and regulation of inflammasome components.[8]
Scheme 1
Chemical Structure of 13R-HDPA (5)
and Outline of Its Proposed Biosynthesis from n-3 DPA
The presence of a secondary alcohol functionality
at C-13 in all
four RvTs caught our attention as a common and important chemical
feature that most likely is involved early in the biosynthesis of
all four RvTs. LC/MS-MS-based experiments using lipid mediator metabololipidomics
with materials obtained from human neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions
allowed for the identification of a 13-hydroxylated C22-compound biosynthesized
in human endothelial cell assays. Incubations of n-3 DPA with human
recombinant cyclooxygenase-2 (hrCOX-2), together with UV experiments
and chiral-phase LC-MS/MS analyses, provided evidence for the involvement
of the hydroperoxide of a 13(R)-hydroxy-docosapentaenoic
acid intermediate (13R-HpDPA) in the biosynthesis
of the 13 series resolvins.[8] Given the
potency of these molecules (pM–nM) and the fact that they are
produced in small amounts (pg–ng) within biological systems,
it was not possible to determine the exact configurations of the double
bonds or the absolute configurations of the secondary alcohols in
RvTs 1–4. Based on biosynthetic considerations,[4,5,9] we tentatively assigned the configurations
of the double bonds as depicted.As bacterial infections in
humans remain a serious health concern
due to the rise in antibiotic resistance toward existing antibacterial
therapeutics, an imminent need for new treatment strategies exists.[10] Of interest toward this aim, the RvTs 1–4 exert anti-inflammatory and potent
pro-resolving activities by regulating key innate protective responses
during E. coli infections in mice.[8] Due to the interesting and potent biological
activities of the RvTs 1–4, it is
of considerable interest to further investigate their biosynthetic
pathways. Herein, we present direct evidence for the configurational
assignment of the key biosynthetic intermediate in the RvT pathway,
namely, 13R-HDPA (5), by matching material
obtained from total synthesis with that isolated from (a) human endothelial
cells, (b) mouse infectious exudates, and (c) human recombinant COX-2.
We also demonstrate that 13R-HDPA is converted by
human neutrophils to all four RvTs, thereby confirming the role of
13R-HDPA as a key biosynthetic intermediate in RvT
formation.
Results and Discussion
To establish evidence of the
existence of 13R-HDPA
(5) as a pivotal intermediate and its role in the biosynthesis
of the novel 13-series resolvins (RvT 1–4), stereochemically pure 5 was obtained by total
synthesis. First, a synthesis of the terminal alkyne 10 from commercially available 2-pentyn-1-ol (6), Scheme , was needed. The
preparation of diyne 8 was performed as previously reported.[11] Unfortunately, attempted Lindlar reduction of
the internal alkyne in 8 gave no conversion to wanted 9. However, the stereoselective Z-reduction
of the internal alkyne was successfully achieved with P-2 nickel boride
(P-2 Ni),[12,13] which provided 9 in 80% yield.
Removal of the TMS-protecting group was achieved using TBAF buffered
with acetic acid. Addition of acetic acid was absolutely necessary
to suppress the formation of the E-isomer of 10. The modest overall yield of 10 by this sequence
is attributed to the high volatility of 10.
Scheme 2
Synthesis
of (Z)-Hept-4-en-1-yne (10)
Next, vinyl iodide 13 was prepared from commercially
available (R)-α-hydroxy-γ-butyrolactone
(11), via known alcohol 12.[14] An alkyne hydrozirconation of 12, followed
by treatment with iodine, furnished the vinyl iodide 13 in fair yield (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Vinyl Iodide 13
The Wittig salt 19 was prepared
from cycloheptanone
(14) in eight steps. Phosphonium salt 15 was obtained as previously reported[7] in
a sequence involving a Baeyer–Villager oxidation of 14, subsequent methanolysis of the resulting lactone, conversion of
the formed primary alcohol to its iodide that was reacted with triphenylphospine
to give 15. A Wittig reaction of 15 with
TBS-protected 3-hydroxypropanal (16) and subsequent removal
of the silyl group[15] afforded the alcohol 17. This was then converted into the corresponding iodide 18 via an Appel reaction, followed by treatment with triphenylphospine
in refluxing acetonitrile that afforded the desired Wittig salt 19 in 81% yield over the two steps (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Wittig Salt 19
Then terminal alkyne 10 and vinyl iodide 13 were assembled in a Sonogashira
cross-coupling reaction, which produced
the conjugated enyne 20 in 86% yield. Oxidation of the
alcohol in 20 gave aldehyde 21, which was
immediately reacted in a Z-selective Wittig reaction
with the ylide of Wittig salt 19; the latter was generated
at −78 °C after treatment with NaHMDS. This afforded the
ester 22 in 77% yield. Finally, after removal of the
silyl group with in situ-generated HCl from AcCl in MeOH, the internal
alkyne in 23 was stereoselectively reduced using the
Boland protocol,[16] furnishing the conjugated E,Z-diene 24 in 67% yield
(Scheme ). The chemical
purity of ester 24 was >98%. Saponification with LiOH[17] afforded chemically (>98%) and stereochemically
pure 13R-HDPA (5) (>99% ee) according
to LC-MS/MS analyses using a chiral-phase column (Figure ).
Scheme 5
Synthesis of 13R-HDPA (5)
Figure 1
13-HDPA MRM chromatograms from (A) endothelial cells, (B) infectious
exudates, (C) hrCOX-2, and (D) synthetic material of 5. (E) Coinjection of endothelial and synthetic 5.
We next tested whether synthetic 5 matched
authentic
13R-HDPA (5). We first isolated material
from human umbilical endothelial cells[8] that in RP-HPLC-MS-MS metabololipidomics[18] gave a sharp peak with retention time (RT) of 17.5 min (Figure A). 13-HDPA from infectious exudates and
from hrCOX-2 also eluted with RT 17.5
min (Figure B,C).
The same retention time was observed (RT = 17.5 min) for synthetic 13R-HDPA (5), Figure D. Moreover,
coinjection of biological 13-HPDA with synthetic material of 5 gave a single sharp peak with RT 17.5 min (Figure E).13-HDPA MRM chromatograms from (A) endothelial cells, (B) infectious
exudates, (C) hrCOX-2, and (D) synthetic material of 5. (E) Coinjection of endothelial and synthetic 5.Then we sought evidence for the
absolute configuration at C-13
and that synthetic material of 5 eluted with biological
13R-HDPA in a chiral environment. In all biological
systems tested, 13R-HDPA was the main product giving
a sharp peak at RT 5.1 min in a chiral-phase
chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system (Figures A–C). Synthetic 13R-HDPA (5) also gave RT 5.1
min (Figure D), and
when this material was coinjected with biological material, a sharp
peak only at RT 5.1 min was observed (Figure E). Of note, in the
endothelial cell and recombinant enzyme incubations, we also identified
the S-isomer of 13-HDPA that was found to be the
minor product in both incubations forming ∼10% of the overall
13-HDPA levels in the HUVEC incubations (Figure A) and <5% in the recombinant enzyme incubations
(Figure C). This is
in accordance with published findings that COX-2 stereoselectively
converts n-3 DPA to the R-configured stereoisomer
with a small proportion of the substrate being converted to the S-stereoisomer.[8] This is also
observed for other enzymes that lipoxygenate their substrate.[19] Altogether, these efforts established that the
synthetic material of 5 eluted together with biologically
produced 13-HDPA and that the absolute configuration at C-13 is R for biogenic 13-HDPA (5).
Figure 2
13-HDPA chiral LC-MS-MS
derived from (A) endothelial cells, (B)
infectious exudates, (C) hrCOX-2, and (D) synthetic material. (E)
Coinjection of endothelial and synthetic 13R-HDPA.
13-HDPA chiral LC-MS-MS
derived from (A) endothelial cells, (B)
infectious exudates, (C) hrCOX-2, and (D) synthetic material. (E)
Coinjection of endothelial and synthetic 13R-HDPA.To obtain further evidence for
matching physical properties of
authentic and synthetic material of 5, MS-MS spectra
for 13R-HDPA from HUVEC incubations, infectious exudates
and synthetic material of 5 were recorded, that gave
essentially identical MS-MS spectra including fragments at m/z 327, 301, 283, 223, 205, and 195 (Figure A–C).
Figure 3
MS-MS spectra
employed in the identification of 13-HDPA from (A)
endothelial cells, (B) infectious exudates, and (C) synthetic material. n = 3 endothelial cell donors, n = 3 mouse
exudates, and n = 3 for synthetic material.
MS-MS spectra
employed in the identification of 13-HDPA from (A)
endothelial cells, (B) infectious exudates, and (C) synthetic material. n = 3 endothelial cell donors, n = 3 mouse
exudates, and n = 3 for synthetic material.Assessment of the UV chromophore
of biogenic 13R-HDPA from hrCOX-2 and that of the
synthetic material of 5, both gave λmaxMeOH of 237 nm
(Figure A,B), adding
additional confidence in our structural assignment.
Figure 4
UV spectra for (A) hrCOX-2
13-HDPA and (B) synthetic 13R-HDPA (5).
UV spectra for (A) hrCOX-213-HDPA and (B) synthetic 13R-HDPA (5).We next tested whether the synthetic
material 5 was
a substrate for the conversion to any of the four RvTs by human neutrophils.
Incubation of synthetic 13R-HDPA (5)
with human neutrophils gave RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3), and RvT4 (4), as determined
using both retention time (Figure A) and MS-MS spectra (Figure B). Of note in incubations with neutrophils
without 13R-HDPA (5), levels of RvT1
(1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3), and
RvT4 (4), were >75% lower than those found in incubations
with the synthetic material. These results are in accordance with
published findings[8] and indicate that while
PMN may utilize endogenous 13R-HDPA, which may be
esterified and released upon cellular activation as observed for other
SPM biosynthetic intermediates,[20] these
cells rely on other cell types to donate this key biosynthetic intermediate
for RvT biosynthesis. Together these results establish the exact structural
assignment of 13R-HDPA as 13(R)-hydroxy-7Z,10Z,13R,14E,16Z,19Z docosapentaenoic acid
(5), as well as its key role in the RvT biosynthetic
pathway.
Figure 5
Human neutrophils convert 13R-HDPA (5) to RvT1–4 (1–4). Human
neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy donors
and incubated (2 × 107 cells/mL) with or without 13R-HDPA (5) (45 min, 37 °C, 2 μM
A23187, PBS, pH = 7.45). Incubations were quenched with two volumes
of ice cold MeOH and products extracted and profiled using lipid mediator
metabololipidomics. (A) MRM chromatograms for each of the RvT1–4
with relative abundances to their levels in each of the incubations.
(B) MS-MS spectra employed in the identification of RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3) and RvT4 (4). Results are representative of n = 3 healthy volunteers.
Human neutrophils convert 13R-HDPA (5) to RvT1–4 (1–4). Human
neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy donors
and incubated (2 × 107 cells/mL) with or without 13R-HDPA (5) (45 min, 37 °C, 2 μM
A23187, PBS, pH = 7.45). Incubations were quenched with two volumes
of ice cold MeOH and products extracted and profiled using lipid mediator
metabololipidomics. (A) MRM chromatograms for each of the RvT1–4
with relative abundances to their levels in each of the incubations.
(B) MS-MS spectra employed in the identification of RvT1 (1), RvT2 (2), RvT3 (3) and RvT4 (4). Results are representative of n = 3 healthy volunteers.
Conclusions
The biosynthesis of
SPMs in human physiological systems affords
the E- and D-series resolvins with either a E,E,Z,E-tetraene or a E,E,Z-triene moiety.[2,4] On
the other hand, the 13R-series-resolvins display
diene and triene moieties, isolated Z-olefins, and
a hydroxy functionality at C-13. These features distinguish the 13R-series-resolvins from the established families of SPMs
(i.e., the resolvins, protectins, and maresins), as well as other
oxygenated natural products of nonhuman origin.[21] Herein, we have demonstrated that the COX-2 enzyme is involved
in the first step in the biosynthetic pathways of the 13R-series-resolvins. Most likely, as for the other SPM families,[5] the first step involves the formation of a hydroperoxide
intermediate that undergoes distinct enzymatic multistep sequences
to the individual natural products 1–4. Because all families of SPMs,[22] as well
as other oxygenated PUFA-derivatives,[21,23] exhibit potent
and interesting pharmacological actions, these natural products are
of interest as lead compounds toward the clinical development of different
treatments for human diseases, via a novel mechanism as resolution
agonists. Such efforts will be more expedient with knowledge of the
complete structural assignment and biosynthetic pathways of SPMs such
as the 13R-series resolvins.
Experimental
Section
General Experimental Procedures
Optical rotations were
measured using a 0.7 mL cell with a 1.0 dm path length on an Anton
Paar MCP 100 polarimeter. The UV–vis spectra from 190 to 900
nm were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer using quartz
cuvettes. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVII400 spectrometer
at 400 MHz or a Bruker AVII600 spectrometer at 600 MHz for 1H NMR, and at 100 or 150 MHz for 13C NMR. Spectra are
referenced relative to the central residual protium solvent resonance
in 1H NMR (CDCl3 δH = 7.27,
and MeOH-d4 δH = 3.31)
and the central carbon solvent resonance in 13C NMR (CDCl3 δC = 77.00 ppm, and MeOH-d4 = δC = 49.00). High-resolution mass
spectra were recorded on a Waters Prospec Q spectrometer using ES
as the method of ionization. Thin-layer chromatography was performed
on silica gel 60 F254 aluminum-backed plates fabricated by Merck.
Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (40–63
μm) produced by Merck. HPLC analyses for chemical purities were
performed on an Agilent Technologies 1200 Series instrument with diode
array detector set at 254 nm and equipped with a C18 stationary phase
(Eclipse XDB-C18 5 μm 4.6 × 150 mm), applying the conditions
stated. GLC-analyses were performed on an Agilent Technologies 7820A
GC instrument with split injection, FID detector and equipped with
an Agilent J&W HP-5 GC column (30 m × 0.32 mm, 0.25 μm)
applying the conditions stated. Unless stated otherwise, all commercially
available reagents and solvents were used in the form they were supplied
without any further purification. All reactions were performed under
an argon atmosphere, unless otherwise stated. The stated yields are
based on isolated material. Liquid chromatography (LC)-grade solvents
were purchased from Fisher Scientific. The Eclipse Plus C18 column
(100 × 4.6 mm × 1.8 μm) was obtained from Agilent
and C18 SPE columns were from Waters. Commercially available lipid
mediators were obtained from Cayman Chemical.
(Z)-Hept-4-en-1-yn-1-yltrimethylsilane
(9)
A suspension of sodium borohydride (32.9
mg, 0.87 mmol) in EtOH (1.3
mL) was added dropwise to a flask containing nickel acetate tetrahydrate
(217 mg, 0.87 mmol, 14 mol%) in EtOH (13.0 mL) at 0 °C under
stirring. The reaction mixture turned black. After stirring for 15
min at room temperature, ethylenediamine (116 μL, 105 mg, 1.74
mmol) was added, and the stirring was continued for 10 min. The flask
was evacuated and refilled with hydrogen gas before the skipped diyne 8(11) was added (1.00 g, 6.09 mmol,
1.00 equiv). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
under hydrogen atmosphere until completion (∼4 h), then filtered
through a short plug of silica gel that was washed with pentane (10
mL). The filtrate was transferred to a separatory funnel and washed
with H2O (3 × 5.0 mL). The organic layer was dried
(MgSO4), and the solvent was removed in vacuo. Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (pentane) afforded
the desired product 9 as a colorless oil. Yield: 810
mg (80%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δH 5.51–5.42 (m, 1H), 5.42–5.35 (m, 1H), 2.98
(m, 2H), 2.06 (p, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 0.15 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δC 133.7, 123.4, 105.7, 84.2, 20.7,
18.4, 14.1, 0.3. TLC (hexane, KMnO4 stain) Rf = 0.12. The spectroscopic data were in agreement with
those previously reported for this compound.[24]
(Z)-Hept-4-en-1-yne (10)
(Z)-Hept-4-en-1-yn-1-yltrimethylsilane (9) (700 mg, 4.21
mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added to a solution of TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 6.74
mL, 6.74 mmol, 1.60 equiv) and acetic acid (0.40 mL, 6.95 mmol). The
reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h and quenched with
H2O (6.0 mL). Pentane (40 mL) was added, and the organic
layer was washed with saturatedaqNaHCO3 (7.0 mL), water
(10 × 7.0 mL) to remove the remaining THF, and then dried (MgSO4). Pentane was removed by distillation. After distillation,
the product still contained traces of solvents, but that was accounted
for in the next step. Yield: 189 mg (47%); 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δH 5.53–5.45 (m, 1H),
5.44–5.36 (m, 1H), 2.94 (m, 2H), 2.13–2.00 (m, 2H),
1.97 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 0.99 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δC 134.0, 123.1, 83.2, 68.1, 20.6, 16.9, 14.0. The spectroscopic
data were in agreement with those previously reported for this compound.[25]
Compound 12 was prepared as
previously reported.[14] The Schwartz’s
reagent was prepared in situ following the procedure
by Huang and Negishi.[26] Cp2ZrCl2 (1.24 g, 4.23 mmol, 2.10 equiv) in THF (5.00 mL) was cooled
to 0 °C and stirred under argon. A solution of DIBAL-H (1.0 M
in THF, 4.23 mL, 4.23 mmol) was added dropwise. The resultant suspension
was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C and protected from light with
aluminum foil, before the terminal alkyne 12 (431 mg,
2.02 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in THF (1.00 mL) was added. The cooling bath
was removed, and the reaction mixture stirred at room temperature
until a homogeneous solution was observed (ca. 1 h) and then cooled
to −78 °C. A solution of I2 (665 mg, 5.24 mmol,
1.24 equiv) in THF/CH2Cl2 (3.00 mL, 1:1) was
added. The reaction mixture was stirred 45 min before it was filtered
through a plug of silica gel that was successively washed with 20%
EtOAc in heptane. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure,
and the crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel (heptane/EtOAc 8:2) to afford the vinyl iodine 13 as a pale yellow oil. Yield: 385 mg (56%); [α]20 + 58 (c = 0.29, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δH 6.56 (dd, J = 14.4, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (dd, J = 14.4, 1.2 Hz,
1H), 4.37 (m, 1H), 3.79 (ddd, J = 10.9, 7.9, 4.3
Hz, 1H), 3.70 (m, 1H), 2.02 (s, 1H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.72 (m, 1H), 0.90
(s, 9H), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.06 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3) δC 148.4, 76.5, 74.3, 59.7, 39.1,
25.9 (3C), 18.3, −4.4, −4.9;. HRESITOFMS: m/z 365.0403 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C11H23IO2SiNa, 365.0410); TLC (hexane/EtOAc
7:3, KMnO4 stain) Rf = 0.37.
Methyl (Z)-10-hydroxydec-7-enoate (17)
The ester 17 was prepared according to a
literature procedure.[2c] The known Wittig
salt 15(7) (1.70 g, 3.19 mmol,
1.00 equiv) was dissolved in THF (42.0 mL) and HMPA (4.20 mL) and
cooled to −78 °C. NaHMDS (0.60 M in toluene, 5.30 mL,
3.18 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture
was stirred for 30–45 min. Aldehyde 6 (631 mg,
3.35 mmol, 1.05 equiv) in THF (4.20 mL) was then added dropwise, and
stirring was continued for 1.5 h at −78 °C. The flask
was allowed to slowly warm up to 0 °C, and the reaction was quenched
with phosphate buffer (21.1 mL, pH = 7.2). The aq phase was extracted
with Et2O (2 × 20.0 mL), and the combined organic
layers were dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was passed through a short
plug of silica that was washed with 5% EtOAc in heptane (Rf = 0.26). The crude product (868 mg, 2.76 mmol, 1.00
equiv) was dissolved in CH2Cl2/MeOH (1:2, 34.0
mL) and cooled to 0 °C. Camphor-10-sulfonic acid (642 mg, 2.76
mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added in one portion, and the reaction mixture
was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C before it was allowed to slowly
warm up to room temperature and stirred for 1 h. The reaction was
quenched with saturatedaqNaHCO3 (33.3 mL), extracted
with CH2Cl2 (2 × 15.0 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica
gel (heptane/EtOAc 7:3) to afford hydroxyl methyl ester 17 as a clear oil. The chemical purity (>99%) was determined by
GLC
analysis: Initial temperature 100 °C, rate: 5 °C/min, final
temperature 200 °C, tr (minor) =
8.90 min, tr (major) = 9.22 min. Yield:
483 mg (76%); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δH 7.08–6.90 (m, 2H), 5.21 (s, 3H),
5.09 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.92–3.77 (m, 4H),
3.64 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.93 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δC 176.0, 132.7, 126.9,
62.8, 51.9, 34.8, 31.8, 30.4, 29.8, 28.1, 25.9. HRMS (TOF ES+): m/z 223.1305 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C11H20O3Na, 223.1310).
TLC (Heptane/EtOAc 7:3, KMnO4 stain): Rf = 0.23.
The TBS-protected intermediate 22 (64.1 mg, 0.136 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was twice azeotroped with 2-Me-THF
and then stirred under argon at 0 °C before a solution of AcCl
in dry MeOH (1.00 mL, 20.4 μmol, 15.0 mol%) was added. The solution
of AcCl in MeOH was prepared just prior to use by adding AcCl (3.0
μL) to dry MeOH (2.0 mL) under argon. The reaction mixture was
stirred for 7 h at 0 °C. Then CH2Cl2 (2.7
mL) was added, and the reaction was neutralized with a 10% aq solution
of NaHCO3 (140 μL) and washed with H2O
(1.4 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), and the solvent was removed in vacuo,
before the crude product was purified by column chromatography on
silica gel (heptane/EtOAc 85:15) to afford the alcohol 23 as a clear oil. Yield: 44.7 mg (92%); [α]20 = −9.0
(c = 0.27, MeOH); UV(MeOH) λmax 229,
(log ε 3.97); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δH 6.01 (dd, J =
15.9, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dq, J = 15.9, 2.2 Hz, 2H),
5.52–5.32 (m, 6H), 4.11 (dq, J= 6.4, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s,
3H), 3.06 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.81 (m, 2H), 2.38–2.27
(m, 4H), 2.15–2.05 (m, 4H), 1.64 (p, J = 7.4
Hz, 2H), 1.47–1.29 (m, 4H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.5
Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δC 176.0, 145.2, 134.2, 131.4, 131.0, 128.9,
126.0, 124.8, 111.2, 89.6, 79.1, 72.7, 52.0, 36.1, 34.8, 30.4, 29.8,
28.0, 26.8, 25.9, 21.4, 18.2, 14.3; HRESITOFMS: m/z 381.2400 [M+Na]+ (calcd
for C23H34O3Na, 381.2406); TLC (hexane/EtOAc
80:20, KMnO4 stain) Rf = 0.36.
The chemical purity (>98%) was determined by HPLC analysis (Eclipse
XDB-C18, MeOH/H2O 85:15, 1.0 mL/min): tr (major) = 12.94 min and tr (minor) = 15.74 min.
The activated Zn was prepared according
to the literature.[16] A suspension of Zn
dust (2.04 g) in distilled H2O (12.3 mL) was stirred under
argon for 15 min. Cu(OAc)2·H2O (204 mg,
1.02 mmol) was added, the flask was sealed immediately, and the mixture
stirred vigorously for 15 min. Then AgNO3 (204 mg, 1.2
mmol) was added (exothermic reaction), and the reaction mixture was
stirred for an additional 30 min. The activated Zn was filtered under
argon atmosphere and washed successively with H2O, MeOH,
acetone, and Et2O to give a wet material (the activated
Zn was not dried completely). Alkyne 23 (30 mg, 83.7
μmol) was dissolved in MeOH/H2O (2:1) (6.00 mL),
and then the wet activated Zn was added quickly under a blanket of
argon. The reaction was stirred for 10 h in the dark. After completion,
the mixture was filtered through Celite with Et2O, and
the aq phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 3.0 mL). The organic
layers were dried (Na2SO4) and the solvent removed in vacuo, before the crude product was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (heptane/EtOAc 90:10) to afford the methyl
ester 24 as a clear oil. Yield 20.2 mg (67%): [α]20 – 0.5 (c = 0.74, MeOH); UV(MeOH) λmax 237, (log ε = 4.41); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
MeOH-d4) δH 6.55 (ddt, J = 15.1, 11.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (dd, J = 15.2, 6.5 Hz, 1H),
5.50–5.26 (m, 7H), 4.15 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H),
3.65 (s, 3H), 2.94 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.43–2.21 (m, 4H), 2.18–2.02
(m, 4H), 1.61 (p, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.46–1.26
(m, 4H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C
NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δC 176.0, 137.2, 133.1, 131.2, 131.0, 130.9, 129.2, 129.0, 127.8, 126.4,
126.4, 73.1, 52.0, 36.4, 34.8, 30.4, 29.8, 28.0, 26.9, 26.8, 25.9,
21.5, 14.6; HRESITOFMS: m/z 383.2555
[M + Na]+ (calcd for C23H36O3Na, 383.2562); TLC (hexane/EtOAc 75:25, KMnO4 stain) Rf = 0.33. The chemical purity (>98%) was
determined
by HPLC analysis (Eclipse XDB-C18, MeOH/H2O 85:15, 1.0
mL/min): tr (minor) = 13.72 and 17.53
min, and tr (major) = 16.53 min.
Methyl ester 24 (12.0 mg, 33.3 μmol, 1.00 equiv) was dissolved in
THF/MeOH/H2O (2:2:1, 3.90 mL) and cooled to 0 °C.
LiOH (24 mg, mmol, 30.0 equiv) was added in one portion. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 3 h at 0 °C before it was allowed to
warm up to room temperature and stirred until completion, as monitored
by TLC (∼2 h). SaturatedaqNaH2PO4 (6.0
mL) was added. The aq phase was extracted (2 × 3.0 mL), dried
(Na2SO4), and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
on silica gel (heptane/EtOAc 50:50, KMnO4 stain) to afford
the hydroxy acid 5 as colorless oil. Yield: 10.0 mg (87%);
[α]25 - 0.64 (c = 0.47, MeOH);
UV(MeOH) λmax 236, (log ε = 4.39); 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δH 6.55 (ddt, J = 15.2, 11.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H),
5.97 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (dd, J = 15.2, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.49–5.26 (m, 7H), 4.15 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H),
2.80 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.40–2.22 (m, 4H),
2.09 (q, J = 7.6, 6.9 Hz, 4H), 1.61 (p, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.38 (m, 4H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,
3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δC 177.7, 137.1, 133.1, 131.2, 131.1, 130.9, 129.2, 129.0, 127.8,
126.4, 126.4, 73.1, 36.4, 35.0, 30.4, 29.9, 28.1, 26.9, 26.8, 26.0,
21.5, 14.6; HRESITOFMS: m/z 369.2400
[M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H34O3Na, 369.2406); TLC (hexane/EtOAc 50:50, KMnO4 stain) Rf = 0.27.
Biogenic 13R-HDPA
Human umbilical
vein endothelial cells (HUVEC; 8.5 × 105 cells/9.6
cm2) were incubated with IL-1β (10 ng/mL) and TNF-α
(10 ng/mL; 16 h, 37 °C, 5% CO2). Incubations were
quenched using 2 volumes of MeOH containing deuterium labeled d8-5S-HETE.[8]In separate experiments n-3 DPA (Cayman Chemical
Company) was incubated with human recombinant COX-2 (Cayman Chemicals;
in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20 μM porcine hematin, 0.67 mM phenol)
for 30 min at room temperature. Incubations were stopped with two
volumes of MeOH and products extracted using diethyl ether.[8] 13-HDPA was isolated using RP-HPLC (1260 Series;
Agilent Technologies) and an Agilent C18 Poroshell column (3.5 μm
× 4.6 mm × 150 mm) with a mobile phase consisting of MeOH/H2O (60:40, vol/vol) at 0.5 mL/min that was ramped up to 98:2
(v/v) for 20 min.Infectious exudates were collected from mice
(6–8 week old,
male, FvB, Charles River, UK) 12h after administration of E. coli (105 CFU).[28] Exudates were collected in 4 mL of PBS (containing calcium
and magnesium) and placed in 2 volumes of ice-cold MeOH containing d8-5S-HETE and commercially
available lipid mediators. In these experiments, male FvB mice (6–8
weeks of age) were used. These animals were maintained on a standard
chow pellet diet and had access to water ad libitum, with a 12-h light–dark
cycle. All animal experiments were approved and performed under the
guidelines of the Ethical Committee for the Use of Animals, Barts
and The London School of Medicine, and in accordance with the U.K.
Home Office regulations (Guidance on the Operation of Animals, Scientific
Procedures Act, 1986).
RvT Biosynthesis
Human peripheral
blood was collected
according to a protocol approved by Barts and the London Research
Ethics Committee, London, United Kingdom (QMREC 2014:61). Written
informed consent was received from participants prior to inclusion
in the study according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Neutrophils
were prepared following density separation by layering on Ficoll-Histopaque
1077–1. The cells were then centrifuged at 300g (30 min, 4 °C), and contaminating red blood cells were lysed
by hypotonic lyses as in ref (8). Neutrophils 20 × 106 cells/mL (PBS+/+, pH = 7.45) were then incubated with synthetic 13R-HDPA (5) (10 μM) for 45 min (37 °C).
Incubations were stopped with 2 volumes of ice-cold MeOH. NaBH4 was then added to reduce the hydroperoxides produced by the
neutrophil lipoxygenases (1.0 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), and products
were isolated using C18 solid phase extraction as detailed below.
Lipid Mediator Profiling
MeOH (two volumes) was added
to cell incubations, plasma (mouse and human), and infectious exudates,
and samples were stored at −20 °C until extraction. Prior
to extraction, samples were then centrifuged (1200g, 4 °C, 10 min). Supernatants were then collected and brought
to less than 1.0 mL of MeOH content using a gentle stream of nitrogen
gas using a TurboVap LV system (Biotage). The RvT1–4 and 13-HDPA
products were extracted using an ExtraHera (Biotage) automated extraction
system as follows. Solid-phase C18 cartridges were equilibrated with
3.0 mL of MeOH and 6.0 mL of H2O. Nine milliliters of aqHCl solution (pH = 3.5) was then added to the samples, and the acidified
solutions were rapidly loaded onto the conditioned C18 columns that
were washed with 4.0 mL of H2O. Next, 5.0 mL of hexane
was added, and the products were eluted with 4.0 mL of methyl formate.
Products were brought to dryness using the automated evaporation system
(TurboVap LV, Biotage) and immediately suspended in MeOH–H20 (50:50 vol/vol) for LC-MS-MS automated injections as previously
reported.[8]Extracted samples were
analyzed by an LC-MS-MS system, Qtrap 5500 (AB Sciex) equipped with
a Shimadzu SIL-20AC autoinjector and LC-20AD binary pump (Shimadzu
Corp.). A Poroshell C18 column (100 mm × 4.6 mm × 2.7 μm)
was used with a gradient of MeOH/H2O/AcOH of 55:45:0.01
(v/v/v) that was ramped to 85:15:0.01 (v/v/v) over 10 min and then
to 98:2:0.01 (v/v/v) for the next 8 min. This was subsequently maintained
at 98:2:0.01 (v/v/v) for 2 min. The flow rate was maintained at 0.4
mL per minute.To monitor and quantify the levels of lipid mediators,
a multiple
reaction monitoring (MRM) method was developed with signature ion
fragments (m/z) for each molecule
monitoring the parent ion (Q1) and a characteristic daughter ion (Q3).
Identification was conducted using published criteria where a minimum
of 6 diagnostic ions were employed, see ref (18) for details. Detection
limit was ∼0.1 pg.For chiral-phase lipidomic analysis,
a Chiralpak AD-RH column (150
mm × 2.1 mm × 5 μm) was used with isocratic MeOH/H2O/AcOH 95:5:0.01 (v/v/v) at 0.15 mL/min. To monitor isobaric
monohydroxy docosapentaenoic acid levels, a multiple reaction monitoring
(MRM) method was developed using signature ion fragments 345 >
195
described.[8]
Authors: Nan Chiang; Gabrielle Fredman; Fredrik Bäckhed; Sungwhan F Oh; Thad Vickery; Birgitta A Schmidt; Charles N Serhan Journal: Nature Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jørn Eivind Tungen; Lisa Gerstmann; Anders Vik; Roberta De Matteis; Romain Alexandre Colas; Jesmond Dalli; Nan Chiang; Charles Nicholas Serhan; Markus Kalesse; Trond Vidar Hansen Journal: Chemistry Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Simen G Antonsen; Harrison Gallantree-Smith; Carl Henrik Görbitz; Trond Vidar Hansen; Yngve H Stenstrøm; Jens M J Nolsøe Journal: Molecules Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.411