Literature DB >> 27704731

Efficacy and Safety of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Asian Subjects with Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Infection: A Sub-Analysis of Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Jun Yong Choi1, Somnuek Sungkanuparph2, Thanomsak Anekthananon3, Paul Sax4, Edwin DeJesus5, Howard Edelstein6, Mark Nelson7, Jennifer DeMorin8, Hui C Liu8, Raji Swamy8, Joonwoo Bahn9, Sunjin Hwang9, Sang Youn Yang9, Christopher Ng8, David Piontkowsky8.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a single tablet regimen (STR) of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) were analyzed in Phase 3 clinical trials in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and ART-experienced Asian subjects infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. Studies GS-US-236-102 and GS-US-236-103 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 144-week studies conducted in ART-naïve subjects, comparing E/C/F/TDF versus efavirenz (EFV)/F/TDF or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) plus emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (F/TDF), respectively. Studies GS-US-236-115 and GS-US-236-121 were randomized, open-label, 96-week long conducted in ART-experienced subjects, who switched to E/C/F/TDF from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI+RTV)+F/TDF, or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)+F/TDF regimens. The E/C/F/TDF appeared to have sustained efficacy and safety and was well tolerated in the small number of ART-naïve and ART-experienced Asian subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiretroviral therapy; Asian Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Human immunodeficiency virus

Year:  2016        PMID: 27704731      PMCID: PMC5048004          DOI: 10.3947/ic.2016.48.3.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1598-8112


The single tablet regimen (STR) containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) is a recommended regimen in the guidelines of the US Department of Health and Human Services and the European acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Society [12]. In two Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in ART-naïve adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, E/C/F/TDF (n = 701) demonstrated non-inferior efficacy at week 48, 96, and 144 compared to the STR of efavirenz (EFV)/F/TDF (GS-US-236-0102, Study 102) and the ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) plus emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (F/TDF, GS-US-236-0103, Study 103) as well as favorable safety and tolerability [3456789]. Studies GS-US-236-115 (STRATEGY-PI) and GS-US-236-121 (STRATEGY-NNRTI) examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to E/C/F/TDF from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI+RTV)+ F/TDF or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)+F/TDF regimens, respectively, in virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL), ART-experienced adult subjects [10111213]. At week 48 and 96, the STRATEGY-PI study showed that switching to E/C/F/TDF from a PI+RTV-based regimen was associated with significantly higher rates of virological success, lower triglyceride levels, and improvements in self-reported diarrhea and bloating[14]. The STRATEGY-NNRTI study showed the non-inferior efficacy of E/C/F/TDF versus remaining on the NNRTI+ F/TDF regimen, improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to NNRTI-associated neuropsychiatric side effects, and greater treatment satisfaction scores [15]. There is limited data on the efficacy and safety of current antiretroviral therapies in Asian subjects infected with HIV-1. Here, we report a sub-analysis of E/C/F/TDF efficacy and safety data in Asian subjects enrolled in Studies 102 and 103 at week 144 as well as Studies 115 and 121 at week 96. In the two ART-naïve studies, 1,408 subjects (E/C/F/TDF, n = 701 vs. EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 352 vs. ATV+RTV+ F/TDF, n = 355) were enrolled and received at least one dose of a study drug. In the two studies with ART-experienced, virologically suppressed subjects, 867 (Study 115: E/C/F/TDF, n = 293 vs. PI+RTV+ F/TDF, n = 140 and Study 121: E/C/F/TDF, n = 291 vs. NNRTI+ F/TDF, n=143) were enrolled and received at least one dose of a study drug. In these four clinical trials, 72 Asian subjects consisting of 50 ART-naïve (E/C/F/TDF, n=23; EFV/F/TDF, n = 10; and ATV+RTV+ F/TDF, n = 17) and 22 ART-experienced, virologically suppressed (Study 115: E/C/F/TDF, n = 7 and PI+RTV+ F/TDF, n=2; and Study 121: E/C/F/TDF and n = 4; NNRTI+ F/TDF, n = 9) were included in this sub-analysis of the E/C/F/TDF data [16]. The baseline demographics and disease characteristics of the ART-naïve (Studies 102 and 103, pooled) and ART-experienced (Study 115 and Study 121, separately) subjects on E/C/F/TDF were as follows: median age 33, 33, and 45 years; male: 83%, 71%, and 100%; mean CD4 count: 374, 548, and 402 cells/mm3; and median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Cockcroft-Gault method: 100, 104, and 125 mL/min, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics: Asian Subpopulation Studies

Characteristic, % (n)ART-naïve Studies 102 and 103
E/C/F/TDF (n=23)EFV/F/TDF (n=10)ATV+RTV+F/TDF (n=17)
Median Age, years (range)33 (19-48)32 (25-49)35 (19-52)
Male83 (19)90 (9)88 (15)
Asymptomatic HIV Infection87 (20)100 (10)82 (14)
HBV : HCV Seropositive0%:0%10%:0%12%:0%
Country of Enrollment
 USA35 (8)100 (10)18 (3)
 Thailand30 (7)024 (4)
 Europe26 (6)06 (1)
 Othera9 (2)053 (9)
Median HIV-1 RNA, log10c/mL4.84.64.6
 > 100,000 c/mL35 (8)30 (3)24 (4)
Mean CD4+ T cell count, cells/mm3, (range)374 (220-570)338 (152-653)346 (51-507)
 ≤35052 (12)60 (6)47 (8)
 ≤200020 (2)12 (2)
Median GFR by Cockcroft Gault, mL/min10093105

aOther: E/C/F/TDF; Australia (2); ATV+RTV+TVD; Australia (7); Canada (2)

bOther: E/C/F/TDF: Switzerland (1); NNRTI+TVD: Australia (1)

E, elvitegravir; C, cobicistat; F, emtricitabine; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; EFV, efavirenz; ATV, atazanavir; RTV, ritonavir; PI, protease inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; GFR, glomerular filtration rate

Similar high rates of virological success (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL, FDA Snapshot Analysis) and comparable immunological outcomes were observed in the ART-naïve and ART-experienced subjects on E/C/F/TDF. In the ART-naïve subjects, the virological success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was 91, 80, and 76% with E/C/F/TDF, EFV/F/TDF, ATV+RTV+ F/TDF, respectively at week 144. The mean CD4+ T cell count (/mm3) increased from baseline through week 144 (235, E/C/F/TDF; 161, EFV/F/TDF; and 250, ATV+RTV+ F/TDF). In the ART-experienced, virologically suppressed subjects, the virological success (maintenance of HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL) of the E/C/F/TDF regimen was 86 and 100% (Studies 115 and 121, respectively) at week 96. The virological success rates for subjects who remained on the PI+RTV+ F/TDF or NNRTI+ F/TDF regimens were 100 and 67%, respectively, both at week 96. The mean CD4+ T cell count increases were similar for E/C/F/TDF in both Studies 115 and 121: 61 and 71 cells/mm3 compared to -30 and 162 cells/mm3 for patients who remained on the PI+RTV+ F/TDF and NNRTI+ F/TDF regimens, respectively (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Virological and immunological outcomes studies 102 and 103: Asian subset through week 144

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RNA, ribonucleic acid; FDA, food and drug administration; E, elvitegravir; C, cobicistat; F, emtricitabine; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; ATV, atazanavir; RTV, ritonavir; TVD, truvada; PI, protease inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor

The overall safety and tolerability of E/C/F/TDF in both ART-naïve and ART-experienced subjects were similar to that of E/C/F/TDF in the overall populations enrolled in the four studies. In the ART naïve subjects, the most common study drug-related adverse events (AEs) with E/C/F/TDF were nausea (n = 4 vs. EFV/F/TDF, n = 0 and ATV+RTV+ F/TDF, n = 5), abnormal dreams (n = 2 vs. 5 and 1, respectively), diarrhea (n = 2 vs. 0 and 3, respectively) and dizziness (n = 1 vs. 2 and 2, respectively). Grade 3AEs occurred in subjects with similar frequency between E/C/F/TDF (17%, n = 4) and EFV/F/TDF (20%, n = 2) while no subjects in the ATV+RTV+ F/TDF treatment arm experienced this Grade. Furthermore, there were no Grade 4 AEs. There were few study drug discontinuations due to AEs in the ART-naïve subjects and the frequency was similar between the treatment arms [E/C/F/TDF, n = 1 due to lymphoma; EFV/F/TDF, n=1 due to presyncope; and ATV+RTV+ F/TDF, n = 2 due to gastrointestinal disorder consisting of diarrhea (one subject) and nausea, vomiting, and flatulence (one subject, who also had dizziness)]. In the ART-experienced subjects, the most common study drug-related AEs with E/C/F/TDF in Study 115 were, enlarged parotid gland and alopecia (n = 1 each) and in Study 121, increased weight (n = 1) and GFR (n = 1 in male, 47 years old, observed as Grade 1). Only one Grade 3-4 AE occurred in the ART-experienced subjects, which was a subject with a clavicle fracture treated on E/C/F/TDF. There were no subjects on E/C/F/TDF in the ART-experienced studies that discontinued the study drug because of AEs and no subjects in either the ART-naïve or ART-experienced discontinued E/C/F/TDF because of renal AEs. The treatment emergent Grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities observed with E/C/F/TDF were all Grade 3 (alanine transaminase [ALT], n = 2; aspartate transaminase [AST], n = 1; and hyperuricemia, n = 1) in ART-experienced subjects. Cobicistat induced a slight increase in serum creatinine (SCr) with a consequent reduction in the eGFR in Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials [171819]. The changes in SCr are caused by the inhibition of tubular creatinine secretion with no effect on the actual glomerular filtration rate, as measured by the clearance of iohexol [18]. In this sub-analysis in Asian subjects, the median changes from baseline in SCr were similar to that observed in the overall study population on E/C/F/TDF. The median change from baseline in the SCr of the ART-naïve subjects was 0.14 mg/dL with E/C/F/TDF vs. -0.03 mg/dL with EFV/F/TDF and 0.04 mg/dL with ATV+RTV+F/TDF. Furthermore, the values for the ART-experienced subjects were 0.06 mg/dL with E/C/F/TDF vs. -0.18 mg/dL with PI+RTV+F/TDF (Study 115) and 0.05 mg/dL with both E/C/F/TDF and NNRTI+F/TDF (Study 121). In Asian subjects, the median changes from baseline in the fasting lipid parameters [total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)] were slight with E/C/F/TDF, which resulted in minimal median changes in the TC:HDL ratio [ART-naïve (0.1) and ART-experienced (Studies 115 and 121, 0.2 and 0.0, respectively)] (Fig. 2)
Figure 2

Median change in fasting lipids from baseline

TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotei

A limitation of this sub-analysis is the small number of Asian subjects, who accounted for 4 and 3% of the overall population of the participants enrolled in the ART-naïve and ART-experienced studies. This restricted the definitive assessment of the safety and tolerability of E/C/F/TDF in Asian subjects, and may limit generalization of the results. In these sub-studies of Phase 3 clinical trials of E/C/F/TDF, the Asian subjects with HIV-1 infections who were either initiating E/C/F/TDF therapy or switching to E/C/F/TDF from RTV-boosted PIs or NNRTIs (both combined with F/TDF) demonstrated a high (>90%) efficacy (HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL). The safety and tolerability profile of E/C/F/TDF in the Asian subjects was similar to that of E/C/F/TDF in the overall study populations investigated [891213]. No new or unique safety concerns were observed in the ART-naïve and ART-experienced Asian subjects on E/C/F/TDF. The AEs leading to study drug discontinuation were uncommon with no renal AEs leading to discontinuation with E/C/F/TDF. Changes in the SCr of Asian subjects on E/C/F/TDF were consistent with those observed in the overall populations enrolled in the ART-naïve and ART-experienced studies. The changes from baseline in SCr observed at week 144 and 96 (ART-naïve and ART-experienced, respectively) were similar to those observed from baseline to week 48, which suggests the initial increase in SCr with E/C/F/TDF was caused by the inhibitory effect of cobicistat on the renal tubular creatinine secretion, which then stabilized [20]. The slight changes in the lipid parameters in Asian subjects on E/C/F/TDF resulted in minimal changes in the TC:HDL ratio and were similar to those in the overall study population. In summary, from this sub-analysis in a small number of Asian subjects, E/C/F/TDF appears to have sustained efficacy and is safe and well-tolerated based on the available data in both the ART-naïve and ART-experienced Asian subjects.
  13 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-tablet regimen elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF vs ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir DF for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 144 results.

Authors:  Nathan Clumeck; Jean-Michel Molina; Keith Henry; Joseph Gathe; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Edwin DeJesus; Xuelian Wei; Kirsten White; Marshall W Fordyce; Martin S Rhee; Javier Szwarcberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-tablet regimen elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus single-tablet regimen efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 144 results.

Authors:  David A Wohl; Calvin Cohen; Joel E Gallant; Anthony Mills; Paul E Sax; Edwin Dejesus; Andrew Zolopa; Hui C Liu; Andrew Plummer; Kirsten L White; Andrew K Cheng; Martin S Rhee; Javier Szwarcberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Phase 2 study of cobicistat versus ritonavir each with once-daily atazanavir and fixed-dose emtricitabine/tenofovir df in the initial treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  Richard Elion; Calvin Cohen; Joseph Gathe; Peter Shalit; Trevor Hawkins; Hui C Liu; Anita A Mathias; Steven L Chuck; Brian P Kearney; David R Warren
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Effect of cobicistat on glomerular filtration rate in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

Authors:  Polina German; Hui C Liu; Javier Szwarcberg; Mischa Hepner; Jessica Andrews; Brian P Kearney; Anita Mathias
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks.

Authors:  Paul E Sax; Edwin DeJesus; Anthony Mills; Andrew Zolopa; Calvin Cohen; David Wohl; Joel E Gallant; Hui C Liu; Lijie Zhong; Kitty Yale; Kirsten White; Brian P Kearney; Javier Szwarcberg; Erin Quirk; Andrew K Cheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Switching to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus continuation of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with emtricitabine and tenofovir in virologically suppressed adults with HIV (STRATEGY-NNRTI): 48 week results of a randomised, open-label, phase 3b non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Anton Pozniak; Martin Markowitz; Anthony Mills; Hans-Juergen Stellbrink; Antonio Antela; Pere Domingo; Pierre-Marie Girard; Keith Henry; Thai Nguyen; David Piontkowsky; Will Garner; Kirsten White; Bill Guyer
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Randomized, phase 2 evaluation of two single-tablet regimens elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the initial treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  Calvin Cohen; Richard Elion; Peter Ruane; David Shamblaw; Edwin DeJesus; Bruce Rashbaum; Steven L Chuck; Kitty Yale; Hui C Liu; David R Warren; Srinivasan Ramanathan; Brian P Kearney
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Edwin DeJesus; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Keith Henry; Jean-Michel Molina; Joseph Gathe; Srinivasan Ramanathan; Xuelian Wei; Kitty Yale; Javier Szwarcberg; Kirsten White; Andrew K Cheng; Brian P Kearney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A randomized, double-blind comparison of coformulated elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF vs ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus coformulated emtricitabine and tenofovir DF for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 96 results.

Authors:  Jürgen K Rockstroh; Edwin DeJesus; Keith Henry; Jean-Michel Molina; Joseph Gathe; Srinivasan Ramanathan; Xuelian Wei; Andrew Plummer; Michael Abram; Andrew K Cheng; Marshall W Fordyce; Javier Szwarcberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  A randomized double-blind comparison of coformulated elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 96 results.

Authors:  Andrew Zolopa; Paul E Sax; Edwin DeJesus; Anthony Mills; Calvin Cohen; David Wohl; Joel E Gallant; Hui C Liu; Andrew Plummer; Kirsten L White; Andrew K Cheng; Martin S Rhee; Javier Szwarcberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more
  1 in total

1.  A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV.

Authors:  Patrick G Clay; Wei C Yuet; Christiane H Moecklinghoff; Inge Duchesne; Krzysztof L Tronczyński; Sandip Shah; Dong Shao
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.250

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.