Literature DB >> 22748591

Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks.

Paul E Sax1, Edwin DeJesus2, Anthony Mills3, Andrew Zolopa4, Calvin Cohen5, David Wohl6, Joel E Gallant6, Hui C Liu7, Lijie Zhong8, Kitty Yale8, Kirsten White8, Brian P Kearney8, Javier Szwarcberg8, Erin Quirk8, Andrew K Cheng8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integrase inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in a single tablet given once daily. We compared the efficacy and safety of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with standard of care-co-formulated efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF-as initial treatment for HIV infection.
METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, treatment-naive patients from outpatient clinics in North America were randomly assigned by computer-generated allocation sequence with a block size of four in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF, once daily, plus matching placebo. Patients and study staff involved in giving study treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting and analysing data were masked to treatment allocation. Eligibility criteria included screening HIV RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more, and susceptibility to efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01095796.
FINDINGS: 700 patients were randomly assigned and treated (348 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, 352 with EFV/FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to EFV/FTC/TDF; 305/348 (87·6%) versus 296/352 (84·1%) of patients had HIV RNA concentrations of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (difference 3·6%, 95% CI -1·6% to 8·8%). Proportions of patients discontinuing drugs for adverse events did not differ substantially (13/348 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group vs 18/352 in the EFV/FTC/TDF group). Nausea was more common with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF than with EFV/FTC/TDF (72/348 vs 48/352) and dizziness (23/348 vs 86/352), abnormal dreams (53/348 vs 95/352), insomnia (30/348 vs 49/352), and rash (22/348 vs 43/352) were less common. Serum creatinine concentration increased more by week 48 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group than in the EFV/FTC/TDF group (median 13 μmol/L, IQR 5 to 20 vs 1 μmol/L, -6 to 8; p<0·001).
INTERPRETATION: If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the only single-tablet, once-daily, integrase-inhibitor-based regimen for initial treatment of HIV infection. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748591     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60917-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  142 in total

1.  Antiviral characteristics of GSK1265744, an HIV integrase inhibitor dosed orally or by long-acting injection.

Authors:  Tomokazu Yoshinaga; Masanori Kobayashi; Takahiro Seki; Shigeru Miki; Chiaki Wakasa-Morimoto; Akemi Suyama-Kagitani; Shinobu Kawauchi-Miki; Teruhiko Taishi; Takashi Kawasuji; Brian A Johns; Mark R Underwood; Edward P Garvey; Akihiko Sato; Tamio Fujiwara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antiretroviral therapy: when to start.

Authors:  Christopher J Sellers; David A Wohl
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 3.  Initial Antiretroviral Therapy in an Integrase Inhibitor Era: Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Sean G Kelly; Mary Clare Masters; Babafemi O Taiwo
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 4.  Correlating structure and function of drug-metabolizing enzymes: progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Eric F Johnson; J Patrick Connick; James R Reed; Wayne L Backes; Manoj C Desai; Lianhong Xu; D Fernando Estrada; Jennifer S Laurence; Emily E Scott
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  Factors Associated With Insulin Resistance in Adults With HIV Receiving Contemporary Antiretroviral Therapy: a Brief Update.

Authors:  Todd Hulgan
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 6.  Comparative Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Anthony T Podany; Kimberly K Scarsi; Michelle M Pham; Courtney V Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Inflammation, Immune Activation, and Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV.

Authors:  Corrilynn O Hileman; Nicholas T Funderburg
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of boosted elvitegravir in subjects with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Joseph M Custodio; Martin Rhee; Gong Shen; Kah Hiing J Ling; Brian P Kearney; Srinivasan Ramanathan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Renal effects of novel antiretroviral drugs.

Authors:  James Milburn; Rachael Jones; Jeremy B Levy
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  The combined anti-HIV-1 activities of emtricitabine and tenofovir plus the integrase inhibitor elvitegravir or raltegravir show high levels of synergy in vitro.

Authors:  Rima Kulkarni; Rebecca Hluhanich; Damian M McColl; Michael D Miller; Kirsten L White
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.