Literature DB >> 27704138

Toward Designing Information Display to Support Critical Care. A Qualitative Contextual Evaluation and Visioning Effort.

Melanie C Wright1, Sherry Dunbar, Brekk C Macpherson, Eugene W Moretti, Guillherme Del Fiol, Jean Bolte, Jeffrey M Taekman, Noa Segall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Electronic health information overload makes it difficult for providers to quickly find and interpret information to support care decisions. The purpose of this study was to better understand how clinicians use information in critical care to support the design of improved presentation of electronic health information.
METHODS: We conducted a contextual analysis and visioning project. We used an eye-tracker to record 20 clinicians' information use activities in critical care settings. We played video recordings back to clinicians in retrospective cued interviews and queried: 1) context and goals of information use, 2) impacts of current display design on use, and 3) processes related to information use. We analyzed interview transcripts using grounded theory-based content analysis techniques and identified emerging themes. From these, we conducted a visioning activity with a team of subject matter experts and identified key areas for focus of design and research for future display designs.
RESULTS: Analyses revealed four unique critical care information use activities including new patient assessment, known patient status review, specific directed information seeking, and review and prioritization of multiple patients. Emerging themes were primarily related to a need for better representation of dynamic data such as vital signs and laboratory results, usability issues associated with reducing cognitive load and supporting efficient interaction, and processes for managing information. Visions for the future included designs that: 1) provide rapid access to new information, 2) organize by systems or problems as well as by current versus historical patient data, and 3) apply intelligence toward detecting and representing change and urgency.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study can be used to guide the design of future acute care electronic health information display. Additional research and collaboration is needed to refine and implement intelligent graphical user interfaces to improve clinical information organization and prioritization to support care decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records and systems; clinical decision support; clinical documentation and communications; human-computer interaction; intensive and critical care; interfaces and usability; monitoring and surveillance; qualitative; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27704138      PMCID: PMC5228134          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-03-RA-0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  42 in total

1.  Providing concept-oriented views for clinical data using a knowledge-based system: an evaluation.

Authors:  Qing Zeng; James J Cimino; Kelly H Zou
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Ecological interface design: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Kim J Vicente
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.

Authors:  David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman; Samuel Wang; Tejal Gandhi; Anne Kittler; Lynn Volk; Cynthia Spurr; Ramin Khorasani; Milenko Tanasijevic; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems.

Authors:  David Gans; John Kralewski; Terry Hammons; Bryan Dowd
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  An interface-driven analysis of user interactions with an electronic health records system.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Rema Padman; Michael P Johnson; Herbert S Diamond
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Critical issues in an electronic documentation system.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Jonathan R Nebeker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

7.  Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers; Linda W P Peute; Arnaud Lauteslager; Piet J M Bakker
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

8.  Human errors in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  D Bracco; J B Favre; B Bissonnette; J B Wasserfallen; J P Revelly; P Ravussin; R Chioléro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Critical care physician cognitive task analysis: an exploratory study.

Authors:  James C Fackler; Charles Watts; Anna Grome; Thomas Miller; Beth Crandall; Peter Pronovost
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The impact of adverse events in the intensive care unit on hospital mortality and length of stay.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng; Jon Hooper; Kaveh G Shojania; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  22 in total

1.  Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalie G Waller; Melanie C Wright; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Thomas Reese; Damian Borbolla; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Design and Implementation of a Pediatric ICU Acuity Scoring Tool as Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Eric Shelov; Naveen Muthu; Heather Wolfe; Danielle Traynor; Nancy Craig; Christopher Bonafide; Vinay Nadkarni; Daniela Davis; Maya Dewan
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Patient information organization in the intensive care setting: expert knowledge elicitation with card sorting methods.

Authors:  Thomas Reese; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rosalie Waller; Brekk C Macpherson; Joseph E Tonna; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Health IT Usability Focus Section: Data Use and Navigation Patterns among Medical ICU Clinicians during Electronic Chart Review.

Authors:  Matthew E Nolan; Rizwan Siwani; Haytham Helmi; Brian W Pickering; Pablo Moreno-Franco; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Organizing Audible Alarm Sounds in the Hospital: A Card-Sorting Study.

Authors:  Melanie C Wright; Sydney Radcliffe; Suzanne Janzen; Judy Edworthy; Thomas Reese; Noa Segall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.968

6.  A Daily Hospital Progress Note that Increases Physician Usability of the Electronic Health Record by Facilitating a Problem-Oriented Approach to the Patient and Reducing Physician Clerical Burden.

Authors:  James M Sutton; Steven R Ash; Akram Al Makki; Rabih Kalakeche
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 7.  A Research Agenda for Diagnostic Excellence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Christina L Cifra; Jason W Custer; James C Fackler
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Diagnosis Documentation of Critically Ill Children at Admission to a PICU.

Authors:  Victoria Y Vivtcharenko; Sonali Ramesh; Kimberly C Dukes; Hardeep Singh; Loreen A Herwaldt; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Christina L Cifra
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  User-Centered Clinical Display Design Issues for Inpatient Providers.

Authors:  Thomas A Lasko; David A Owens; Daniel Fabbri; Jonathan P Wanderer; Julian Z Genkins; Laurie L Novak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Graphical Presentations of Clinical Data in a Learning Electronic Medical Record.

Authors:  Luca Calzoni; Gilles Clermont; Gregory F Cooper; Shyam Visweswaran; Harry Hochheiser
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.