Literature DB >> 18693944

Critical issues in an electronic documentation system.

Charlene R Weir1, Jonathan R Nebeker.   

Abstract

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA), of the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs has instituted a medical record (EMR) that includes electronic documentation of all narrative components of the medical record. To support clinicians using the system, multiple efforts have been instituted to ease the creation of narrative reports. Although electronic documentation is easier to read and improves access to information, it also may create new and additional hazards for users. This study is the first step in a series of studies to evaluate the issues surrounding the creation and use of electronic documentation. Eighty-eight providers across multiple clinical roles were interviewed in 10 primary care sites in the VA system. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed for themes. In addition, specific questions were asked about perceived harm due to electronic documentation practices. Five themes relating to difficulties with electronic documentation were identified: 1) information overload; 2) hidden information; 3) lack of trust; 4) communication; 5) decision-making. Three providers reported that they knew of an incident where current documentation practices had caused patient harm and over 75% of respondents reported significant mis-trust of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18693944      PMCID: PMC2655797     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  9 in total

1.  Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Marc Berg; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication.

Authors:  Kenric W Hammond; Susan T Helbig; Craig C Benson; Beverly M Brathwaite-Sketoe
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Perceptions of physician order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study.

Authors:  J S Ash; P N Gorman; M Lavelle; P Z Stavri; J Lyman; L Fournier; J Carpenter
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Thomas R Yackel; Judith R Logan; Judith L Bowen; Thomas G Cooney; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Reading the medical record. I. Analysis of physicians' ways of reading the medical record.

Authors:  E Nygren; P Henriksson
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context.

Authors:  M Berg; C Langenberg; I vd Berg; J Kwakkernaat
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions.

Authors:  P C Tang; M P LaRosa; S M Gorden
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  The granularity of medical narratives and its effect on the speed and completeness of information retrieval.

Authors:  H J Tange; H C Schouten; A D Kester; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.

Authors:  C R Weir; J F Hurdle; M A Felgar; J M Hoffman; B Roth; J R Nebeker
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Point-of-care clinical documentation: assessment of a bladder cancer informatics tool (eCancerCareBladder): a randomized controlled study of efficacy, efficiency and user friendliness compared with standard electronic medical records.

Authors:  Peter J Bostrom; Paul J Toren; Hao Xi; Raymond Chow; Tran Truong; Justin Liu; Kelly Lane; Laura Legere; Anjum Chagpar; Alexandre R Zlotta; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Ethan D Grober; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  What do physicians read (and ignore) in electronic progress notes?

Authors:  P J Brown; J L Marquard; B Amster; M Romoser; J Friderici; S Goff; D Fisher
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Initial Steps toward Validating and Measuring the Quality of Computerized Provider Documentation.

Authors:  Kenric W Hammond; Efthimis N Efthimiadis; Charlene R Weir; Peter J Embi; Stephen M Thielke; Ryan M Laundry; Ashley Hedeen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

4.  What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Catherine Staes; Stacey Slager; Teresa Taft; Valiammai Chidambaram; Heidi Kramer; Bruce E Bray; Seneca Perri Moore
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

5.  The orderly and effective visit: impact of the electronic health record on modes of cognitive control.

Authors:  Charlene Weir; Frank A Drews; Molly K Leecaster; Robyn J Barrus; James L Hellewell; Jonathan R Nebeker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

6.  The relationship between structural characteristics of 2010 challenge documents and ratings of document quality.

Authors:  Shuying Shen; Brett R South; Jorie Butler; Robyn Barrus; Charlene Weir
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

7.  A qualitative analysis of EHR clinical document synthesis by clinicians.

Authors:  Oladimeji Farri; David S Pieckiewicz; Ahmed S Rahman; Terrence J Adam; Serguei V Pakhomov; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

8.  Relationship between documentation method and quality of chronic disease visit notes.

Authors:  P M Neri; L A Volk; S Samaha; S E Pollard; D H Williams; J M Fiskio; E Burdick; S T Edwards; H Ramelson; G D Schiff; D W Bates
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Electronic versus dictated hospital discharge summaries: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David M Maslove; Richard E Leiter; Joshua Griesman; Corinne Arnott; Ophyr Mourad; Chi-Ming Chow; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Electronic Health Record Adoption - Maybe It's not about the Money: Physician Super-Users, Electronic Health Records and Patient Care.

Authors:  L Grabenbauer; A Skinner; J Windle
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.