BACKGROUND: Traditional intra-articular arthroscopic repair techniques for massive anterosuperior rotator cuff tears are technically demanding and necessitate sacrifice of the rotator interval to enable visualization. An interval slide allows mobilization through release of the medial aspect of the rotator interval, while leaving the lateral, bridging fibers intact. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to report a novel, arthroscopic, open-equivalent technique using the subdeltoid space to address these tears along with early clinical results. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified 11 consecutive arthroscopic massive anterosuperior rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant biceps tenodesis performed by the senior surgeon using a uniform technique. Outcome measures included range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, rotator cuff strength, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scale, and Short Form-12 (SF-12). RESULTS: Average length of follow-up was 22.2 months (range 12.5-30.0 months). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, ASES, and SF-12 all demonstrated significant improvement from pre-op to final follow-up from 6.2 to 0.9 (p < 0.05), 27.4 to 82.8 (p < 0.05), and 26.6 to 45.5 (p < 0.05) respectively. Average forward flexion improved from 145° to 160° (p < 0.05). Seven of the nine patients with a positive preoperative belly press had a negative test at final follow-up. Nine of the 10 patients with a positive lift off test demonstrated a negative test on final follow-up. Ninety-one percent reported they were satisfied with their outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The described modified all-arthroscopic subdeltoid approach for anterosuperior cuff repairs enabled an open-equivalent interval slide technique that preserved the bridging lateral fibers of the rotator interval and demonstrated promising early-term clinical results.
BACKGROUND: Traditional intra-articular arthroscopic repair techniques for massive anterosuperior rotator cuff tears are technically demanding and necessitate sacrifice of the rotator interval to enable visualization. An interval slide allows mobilization through release of the medial aspect of the rotator interval, while leaving the lateral, bridging fibers intact. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to report a novel, arthroscopic, open-equivalent technique using the subdeltoid space to address these tears along with early clinical results. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified 11 consecutive arthroscopic massive anterosuperior rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant biceps tenodesis performed by the senior surgeon using a uniform technique. Outcome measures included range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, rotator cuff strength, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) outcome scale, and Short Form-12 (SF-12). RESULTS: Average length of follow-up was 22.2 months (range 12.5-30.0 months). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, ASES, and SF-12 all demonstrated significant improvement from pre-op to final follow-up from 6.2 to 0.9 (p < 0.05), 27.4 to 82.8 (p < 0.05), and 26.6 to 45.5 (p < 0.05) respectively. Average forward flexion improved from 145° to 160° (p < 0.05). Seven of the nine patients with a positive preoperative belly press had a negative test at final follow-up. Nine of the 10 patients with a positive lift off test demonstrated a negative test on final follow-up. Ninety-one percent reported they were satisfied with their outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The described modified all-arthroscopic subdeltoid approach for anterosuperior cuff repairs enabled an open-equivalent interval slide technique that preserved the bridging lateral fibers of the rotator interval and demonstrated promising early-term clinical results.
Authors: Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Peter C Kreuz; Andreas Remiger; Christoph Erggelet; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Philipp Niemeyer; Andre Gächter Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: B Toussaint; S Audebert; J Barth; C Charousset; A Godeneche; T Joudet; Y Lefebvre; L Nove-Josserand; E Petroff; N Solignac; P Hardy; C Scymanski; C Maynou; C-E Thelu; P Boileau; M Pitermann; N Graveleau Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.256
Authors: Mark C Drakos; Nikhil N Verma; Lawrence V Gulotta; Frank Potucek; Samuel Taylor; Stephen Fealy; Ronald M Selby; Stephen J O'Brien Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Mena M Mesiha; Kathleen A Derwin; Scott C Sibole; Ahmet Erdemir; Jesse A McCarron Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Allen D Nicholson; Hafiz F Kassam; Steven D Pan; Jacob E Berman; Theodore A Blaine; David Kovacevic Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 6.202