Ping Fan1, Fadeke A Agboke1, Heather E Cunliffe2, Pilar Ramos2, V Craig Jordan3. 1. Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC 20057, United States. 2. Cancer and Cell Biology Division, The Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States. 3. Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC 20057, United States. Electronic address: vcj2@georgetown.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oestrogen (E2)-stimulated growth re-emerges after a c-Src inhibitor blocking E2-induced apoptosis. A resulting cell line, MCF-7:PF, is selected with features of functional oestrogen receptor (ER) and over-expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor beta (IGF-1Rβ). We addressed the question of whether the selective ER modulator (SERM), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) or other SERMs could target ER to prevent E2-stimulated growth in MCF-7:PF cells. METHODS: Protein levels of receptors and signalling pathways were examined by immunoblotting. Expression of mRNA was measured through real-time RT-PCR. Recruitment of ER or nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (SRC3) to the promoter of ER-target gene was detected by chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RESULTS: 4-OHT and other SERMs stimulated cell growth in an ER-dependent manner. However, unlike E2, 4-OHT suppressed classical ER-target genes as does the pure antioestrogen ICI 182,780 (ICI). ChIP assay indicated that 4-OHT did not recruit ER or SRC3 to the promoter of ER-target gene, pS2. Paradoxically, 4-OHT reduced total IGF-1Rβ but increased phosphorylation of IGF-1Rβ. Mechanistic studies revealed that 4-OHT functioned as an agonist to enhance the non-genomic activity of ER and activate focal adhesion molecules to further increase phosphorylation of IGF-1Rβ. Disruption of membrane-associated signalling, IGF-1R and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), completely abolished 4-OHT-stimulated cell growth. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to recapitulate a cellular model in vitro of acquired tamoxifen resistance developed in athymic mice in vivo. Importantly, it provides a rationale that membrane-associated pathways may be valuable therapeutic targets for tamoxifen resistant patients in clinic.
PURPOSE: Oestrogen (E2)-stimulated growth re-emerges after a c-Src inhibitor blocking E2-induced apoptosis. A resulting cell line, MCF-7:PF, is selected with features of functional oestrogen receptor (ER) and over-expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor beta (IGF-1Rβ). We addressed the question of whether the selective ER modulator (SERM), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) or other SERMs could target ER to prevent E2-stimulated growth in MCF-7:PF cells. METHODS: Protein levels of receptors and signalling pathways were examined by immunoblotting. Expression of mRNA was measured through real-time RT-PCR. Recruitment of ER or nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (SRC3) to the promoter of ER-target gene was detected by chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP). RESULTS:4-OHT and other SERMs stimulated cell growth in an ER-dependent manner. However, unlike E2, 4-OHT suppressed classical ER-target genes as does the pure antioestrogen ICI 182,780 (ICI). ChIP assay indicated that 4-OHT did not recruit ER or SRC3 to the promoter of ER-target gene, pS2. Paradoxically, 4-OHT reduced total IGF-1Rβ but increased phosphorylation of IGF-1Rβ. Mechanistic studies revealed that 4-OHT functioned as an agonist to enhance the non-genomic activity of ER and activate focal adhesion molecules to further increase phosphorylation of IGF-1Rβ. Disruption of membrane-associated signalling, IGF-1R and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), completely abolished 4-OHT-stimulated cell growth. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to recapitulate a cellular model in vitro of acquired tamoxifen resistance developed in athymic mice in vivo. Importantly, it provides a rationale that membrane-associated pathways may be valuable therapeutic targets for tamoxifen resistant patients in clinic.
Authors: Clodia Osipo; Kathleen Meeke; Dong Cheng; Alyssa Weichel; Anne Bertucci; Hong Liu; V Craig Jordan Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Joan S Lewis-Wambi; Helen Kim; Ramona Curpan; Ronald Grigg; Mohammed A Sarker; V Craig Jordan Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: C K Osborne; J Pippen; S E Jones; L M Parker; M Ellis; S Come; S Z Gertler; J T May; G Burton; I Dimery; A Webster; C Morris; R Elledge; A Buzdar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Iain R Hutcheson; Janice M Knowlden; Tracie-Ann Madden; Denise Barrow; Julia M W Gee; Alan E Wakeling; Robert I Nicholson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: S C Drury; S Detre; A Leary; J Salter; J Reis-Filho; V Barbashina; C Marchio; E Lopez-Knowles; Z Ghazoui; K Habben; S Arbogast; S Johnston; M Dowsett Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Min Ji Bak; Philip Furmanski; Naing Lin Shan; Hong Jin Lee; Cheng Bao; Yong Lin; Weichung Joe Shih; Chung S Yang; Nanjoo Suh Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Martin Porsch; Esra Özdemir; Martin Wisniewski; Sebastian Graf; Fabian Bull; Katrin Hoffmann; Atanas Ignatov; Johannes Haybaeck; Ivo Grosse; Thomas Kalinski; Norbert Nass Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Heather M Brechbuhl; Jessica Finlay-Schultz; Tomomi M Yamamoto; Austin E Gillen; Diana M Cittelly; Aik-Choon Tan; Sharon B Sams; Manoj M Pillai; Anthony D Elias; William A Robinson; Carol A Sartorius; Peter Kabos Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ping Fan; Philipp Y Maximov; Ramona F Curpan; Balkees Abderrahman; V Craig Jordan Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Ping Fan; Heather E Cunliffe; Philipp Y Maximov; Fadeke A Agboke; Russell E McDaniel; Xiaojun Zou; Pilar Ramos; Megan L Russell; V Craig Jordan Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 5.852