Literature DB >> 27698815

Clinical analysis of 47 cases of solitary fibrous tumor.

Wei Ge1, De-Cai Yu1, Gang Chen1, Yi-Tao Ding1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to summarize the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). In total, 47 cases of SFTs diagnosed by postoperative pathology between January 2002 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and the general information, clinical manifestations, imaging techniques, treatment, pathology and follow-up findings were analyzed. Of the 47 patients, clinical characteristics were collected in 37 cases (18 men and 19 women; mean age, 44.1 years; age range, 13-72 years). The maximum diameters of the tumors were 1.5-25 cm, with a mean diameter of 8.8 cm. The symptoms were various and non-specific. Imaging examinations following iodinated contrast administration showed the SFTs to be well-defined, cystic or solid mass and enhanced. On color Doppler ultrasound, SFTs were described as hypoechoic, clear, irregular masses. All patients underwent surgical resection, and SFT was diagnosed by postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical examination. Of the 47 patients, 25 received complete follow-up of 5-130 months, with a median follow-up period of 35.2 months, that included a color Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) scan every 6-12 months. At the end of the follow-up period all patients were alive and healthy, with the exception of one patient, who presented with recurrence 15 months after surgery. The findings of the present study showed SFT to be a rare systemic disease with no particular clinical manifestations. In the cases reviewed in the present study, CT, magnetic resonance imaging scans and color Doppler ultrasound were important for the diagnosis of SFT, while the definitive diagnosis relied on pathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Surgery, the primary treatment for SFT, was performed, and, following complete removal of the tumor, the prognosis was favorable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical analysis; pleura; solitary fibrous tumor

Year:  2016        PMID: 27698815      PMCID: PMC5038456          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT), also known as hemangiopericytoma, is a fibroblastic mesenchymal tumor that was first described by Klemperer and Rabin in 1992 (1). SFTs are rare entities accounting for <2% of all soft tissue sarcomas (2). Although SFTs are commonly found in the pleura, according to the literature, 50–70% of these tumors are extrapleural and can manifest in the head and neck, abdomen and pelvis (3). This condition is rare and only limited cases of SFT have been reported. Due to the rarity of this tumor, preoperative diagnosis is challenging and no consensus has been reached on standard treatment. The present study summarizes the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of 47 cases of SFTs from the literature, in order to determine the clinicopathological profile of SFT. To the best of our knowledge, the present retrospective study on SFT is the largest reported to date.

Patients and methods

Patients

Patient files from the Department of Pathology of the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, (Nanjing, China) from the period between January 2002 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and 47 cases of SFT were identified, including 39 inpatients and 8 outpatients. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from all patients. All patients had been diagnosed with SFT by a pathological examination. Patient information, including age and gender, details of the lesion, clinical symptoms at the time of diagnosis, auxiliary and pathological examination findings, treatment and follow-up, was recorded.

Auxiliary examination types and findings

The findings of different types of auxiliary examination, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and color Doppler ultrasound, were reviewed. A histopathological examination of paraffin-embedded surgical specimens was performed to confirm the diagnosis using standard hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical techniques. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a Dako EnVision System (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primary antibodies included rabbit polyclonal antibodies against vimentin (sc-5565; 1:200), cluster of differentiation (CD)34 (sc-9095; 1:100), actin (sc-7210; 1:200), desmin (sc-14026; 1:200), cytokeratin (CK; sc-134493; 1:100), S100 (sc-7849-R; 1:100), B-cell lymphoma 2 (bcl-2; sc-783; 1:200), CD99 (sc-241355; 1:200), CD117 (sc-3936; 1:200), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA; sc-6826; 1:200) and smooth muscle actin (SMA; sc-92040; 1:200; all Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA). 3,3′-diaminobenzidine was used as the chromogen.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Out of the 47 screened patients, full clinical characteristics were collected from 37 (18 men and 19 women; age range, 13–72 years; mean age, 44.1 years) and are summarized in Table I. The maximum diameter of the tumors was 1.5–25 cm, with a mean diameter of 8.8 cm. The patients' symptoms were various and non-specific, and included pain, cough, inhibited defecation and frequent micturition. In total, 23 of the 37 patients (62.2%) had no symptoms at all, and the tumor was discovered incidentally during physical examination. Common lesion locations included the lungs, pleura, chest wall and pelvic cavity, while certain rare sites, including the thyroid, groin, eyebrow bow, bladder, kidney, eye, mediastinum and sigmoid mesocolon, were discovered.
Table I.

Clinical data of 37 patients with solitary fibrous tumor.

Case no./gender/age[a]SymptomLocationTreatmentMargin statusDiameterRecurrenceMetastasisFollow-up, months
1/F/48NoChest wallSENegative  3.0NoNoNED, 130
2/M/35NoLungSENegative  6.0NANANA
3/F/48NoThoracic cavitySENegative21.0NANANA
4/M/49Pharyngeal drynessPharynx side clearanceSENegative  4.0NANANA
5/F/41PainInfratemporal fossaSENegative  5.7NANANA
6/F/44NoDiaphragmSENegative  8.0NANANA
7/F/53Abdominal painMesentery of small intestineSENegative  7.5NANANA
8/M/55Chest painPosterior superior iliac spineSENegativeNANoNoNED, 40
9/F/44NoKidneySENegative11.0NANANA
10/M/47NoForearmSENegative10.0NANANA
11/F/62NoChest wallSENegative  8.0NoNoNED, 68
12/F/13Knees acheKneeSENegative  4.0NANANA
13/M/23NoNasal cavitySENegative  5.0NoNoNED, 65
14/M/62NoPelvic cavitySENegative  9.0NANANA
15/F/51Neck PainCervical vertebraSENegative  2.0NoNoNED, 57
16/M/53NoLungSENegative  3.0NoNoNED, 55
17/M/49Abdominal distensionAbdomenSENegative18.0NANANA
18/M/47NoThoracic cavitySENegative  8.0NoNoNED, 50
19/M/53NoHip jointSENegative10.0NoNoNED, 45
20/M/55Frequency of urinationPelvic cavitySENegative14.0NoNoNED, 44
21/F/13CoughLungSENegative  5.0NoNoNED, 39
22/M/27PainHipSENegative16.0NANANA
23/F/48Headache, tinnitusTemporal lobeSENegative  6.0NoNoNED, 35
24/F/39Chest painMediastinumSENegative11.0NoNoNED, 33
25/M/61NoGastrocolic ligamentSENegative  5.0NoNoNED, 33
26/F/58NoKidneySENegative  8.0YesNoNED, 15 after 2nd surgery
27/F/40NoBladderSENegative  5.0NoNoNED, 30
28/F/64NoLungSENegativeNANoNoNED, 18
29/M/49NoPleuraSENegative  3.5NoNoNED, 18
30/M/60NoTestisSENegative  7.0NoNoNED, 18
31/F/22NoInguinal ligamentSENegative  7.0NoNoNED, 14
32/M/21NoDiaphragmSENegative24.0NoNoNED, 12
33/M/72NoLungSENegative  6.0NoNoNED, 11
34/F/16NoChest wallSENegative  8.5NoNoNED, 10
35/F/34Abdominal painStomachSENegative11.0NoNoNED, 9
36/M/24ConstipationPelvic cavitySENegativeNANoNoNED, 10
37/F/50NoSigmoid mesocolonSENegative25.0NoNoNED, 5

Age is measured in years. F, female; M, male; SE, surgical excision; NA, data not available; NED, no evidence of disease.

CT scan was the most frequent diagnostic imaging technique used. CT images captured following iodinated contrast administration from 30 of the 37 cases showed SFTs as well-defined, cystic or solid mass, and enhanced (Fig. 1). In total, 11 out of 37 patients underwent an MRI scan, in which SFTs were shown as lobulated, heterogeneous soft tissue with short T1-weighted (T1WI) and a flake long T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal. Contrast-enhanced MRI scans demonstrated heterogeneous contrast enhancement (Fig. 2). Color Doppler ultrasound was performed in 14 out of 37 patients and found the tumors to be hypoechoic, clear, irregular masses. All patients underwent successful surgical resection with no serious complications, and no postoperative mortality was recorded. No patient underwent other adjuvant therapy.
Figure 1.

A 50-year-old female presented with a large abdominal mass. Computed tomography scan showing (A) a well-fined cystic or solid mass measuring 24.5×17.4 cm and (B) an uneven enhancement of the tumor following iodinated contrast administration.

Figure 2.

A 48-year-old female presented with a headache that had lasted for 1 month. Magnetic resonance imaging scan showing a well-defined and round soft tissue mass measuring 5×5 cm. (A) T1-weighted image; (B), T2-weighted image; (C) arterial phase; (D) sagittal view.

Pathological findings

All patients were definitively diagnosed with SFT by postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical examination. Macroscopically, most tumors appeared as solid, well-encapsulated, smooth to firm soft tissue masses, with a gray-white to red-brown color on the cut surface. Microscopically, the tumors were shown to be comprised of spindle or short spindle cells and various quantities of vascular tissue. In certain regions, the cells were arranged in short, ill-defined fascicles, whereas in others they were arranged irregularly.

Immunohistochemical findings

Immunohistochemistry showed the following: The positive rates of vimentin, CD34, CD99, bcl-2, actin, desmin, CK, S100, CD117, EMA and SMA were 13/13 (100.0%), 40/46 (87.0%), 25/31 (80.6%), 30/38 (79.0%), 6/21 (28.6%), 2/35 (5.7%), 0/18 (0%), 6/40 (15%), 2/18 (11.1%), 3/13 (23.1%) and 7/15 (46.7%), respectively. The immunohistochemical indexes were selected according to the location of primary lesion, as different tissues have different specific markers. The representative pathological and immunohistochemical images of a patient that presented with SFT in the diaphragm are shown in Fig. 3. The immunohistochemical results for this patient were as follows: CD34−, CD99−, neurofilament−, bc1-2+, desmin−, actin−, S100−, Ki67+ 1% and β-catenin+.
Figure 3.

Microscopic examination of a solitary fibrous tumor located in the diaphragm of a patient, showing proliferating spindle cells with a bundle or flow pattern, determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Clusters of spindle cells were readily identifiable, and no nuclear atypia, mitotic activity or necrosis was evident; magnification, (A) ×100 and (B) ×400. Immunohistochemical examination showing that the tissue was (C) β-catenin and (D) B-cell lymphoma-2 positive.

Follow-up information

A total of 25 patients received complete follow-up lasting 5–130 months (median follow-up period, 35.2 months), during which they underwent a color Doppler ultrasound or CT scan every 6–12 months. At the time of writing, all patients were alive and healthy. Only 1 patient (4%) presented with recurrent SFT 15 months after the first surgery, and had a disease-free survival following the second operation. The status of each patient at the last follow-up is summarized in Table I. The follow-up data from 22 patients of the total 47 (12 of the 37) were either lost or could not be obtained.

Discussion

SFT was first described as a rare spindle cell tumor that arises from the visceral pleura (4); however, over time, SFT was identified in various other locations outside of the thoracic cavity, such as the meninges (5,6), orbit (7), nasal cavity (8), salivary gland (9), parapharyngeal space (10) and paranasal sinuses (11). The present study reviewed numerous cases of SFT manifesting in locations outside the thoracic cavity, such as the thyroid, groin, bladder, sigmoid mesocolon and posterior superior iliac spine, locations that had not been previously reported. According to the literature (12), SFT is usually encountered in middle-aged people with an equal distribution between genders; however, it has also been reported in young patients (13). Consistent with these findings, the gender ratio in the present study was 0.95 (18 men and 19 women) and the mean age was 44.1 years. The symptoms varied depending on the lesions; the majority of patients (23/37) presented with physical symptoms. The diameter of SFTs is usually large (commonly >8cm) (14). In the present study, 50% patients had a tumor measuring >8 cm. SFTs do not express any tumor markers, and diagnostic techniques include CT, MRI scans and color Doppler ultrasound, despite the fact that their results may not be specific (9). These imaging tests often provide the first clue to the identification of the tumors, depiction of local extent and invasion of adjacent structures, which is useful in guiding surgery. On CT scan, SFT appears as a well-defined, heterogeneous or homogeneous isodense mass, and shows moderate to marked enhancement following contrast administration (15,16). On color Doppler ultrasound, it has the appearance of a hypoecho, clear, and irregular mass (17). On MRI, it has been shown to exhibit intermediate signal intensity on T1WI images, and enhancement on T2WI images, which was in accordance with the findings of the present study (18,19). None of these methods, however, could achieve accurate diagnosis; the final diagnosis has been reported to rely on surgical resection and pathological examination (20,21). In the present study, all patients underwent surgical resection. Macroscopically, the majority of SFTs appear as rounded, encapsulated masses of homogenous density, with a yellow/brown-to-white whorled appearance of the cut surface (22). Microscopically, SFTs are shown to be comprised of spindle or short spindle cells and varying quantities of vascular tissue (9). The micro and macroscopic results of the present study were in accordance with the findings of previous studies. Immunohistochemically, SFT shows immunoreactivity with vimentin and CD34, with the largest part of tumor also displaying positive results for bcl-2 and CD99; however, the specimens do not express EMA or S-100 proteins (23). The immunohistochemical analysis results of the current study validated the previous findings. The primary treatment of SFT is surgical resection with negative margins (24). All patients from the present study underwent complete resection without adjuvant treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Tumors that cannot be completely excised or that show malignant histological features may respond to radiation and/or chemotherapy. Xue et al (25) described a case of non-recurrent malignant SFT of the nasal and paranasal areas, and found that the combination of cytoreductive surgery with intensity-modulated radiation and stereotactic body radiation therapies have a good result. Studies have also demonstrated that preoperative embolization may be employed prior to surgical resection for highly vascular tumors (26,27). Immunotherapy, for example with interferon, may also be effective (28). A previous study showed that the prognosis of patients with SFT is favorable (29). Patients that underwent complete tumor resection showed 100% survival at a mean follow-up period of 1.9 years (29). In the present study, all 25 patients that received a complete follow-up were alive at the time of writing. The longest follow-up period among these patients was 130 months. The recurrence rate of SFT was 4%. In conclusion, SFT is a rare systemic disease with no particular clinical manifestations. In the cases reviewed in the present study, CT and MRI scans and color Doppler ultrasound were important for the diagnosis of SFT; however, the final diagnosis relied on pathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Surgery was the primary treatment for SFT, and the prognosis following complete tumor resection was favorable.
  29 in total

1.  [Pleural solitary fibrous tumor from diaphragm, being suspected of liver invasion; report of a case].

Authors:  Yusuke Kita
Journal:  Kyobu Geka       Date:  2012-04

2.  Solitary fibrous tumor of the paranasal sinuses: CT and MR appearance.

Authors:  T A Kim; J A Brunberg; J P Pearson; D A Ross
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Solitary fibrous tumour and haemangiopericytoma: evolution of a concept.

Authors:  C Gengler; L Guillou
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Solitary fibrous tumors in abdomen and pelvis: imaging characteristics and radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Xue-Ming Li; Jing Reng; Peng Zhou; Ying Cao; Zhu-Zhong Cheng; Yan Xiao; Guo-Hui Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Localized benign and malignant fibrous tumors of the pleura. A clinicopathologic review of 223 cases.

Authors:  D M England; L Hochholzer; M J McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the meninges.

Authors:  Kumiko Ogawa; Toyohiro Tada; Satoru Takahashi; Naotake Sugiyama; Shingo Inaguma; Seishiro S Takahashi; Tomoyuki Shirai
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Mesenchymal neoplasms of the major salivary glands: clinicopathological features of 18 cases.

Authors:  Kyung-Ja Cho; Jae Y Ro; Jene Choi; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Total resection of a solitary fibrous tumor of the sellar diaphragm: A case report.

Authors:  Qisheng Zhong; Shaoji Yuan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney: report of the first case managed with interferon.

Authors:  Javier Cuello; Ricardo Brugés
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2013-01-15

10.  Clinicopathological findings in a case series of abdominopelvic solitary fibrous tumors.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Ping Chen; Wei Zhao; Lei Shi; Xuewen Gu; Qing Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Sinonasal Tract Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Clinicopathologic Study of Six Cases with a Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lester D R Thompson; Sean K Lau
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-12-27

2.  Clinicopathological analysis of retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumours: a study of 31 cases.

Authors:  Xiaolu Yuan; Yuan Liu; Xuming Wang; Yu Chen; Lei Zhang; Jianguo Wei
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Mesentery solitary fibrous tumor with postoperative recurrence and sarcomatosis: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Chong-Chi Chiu; Haruaki Ishibashi; Satoshi Wakama; Yang Liu; Yuan Hao; Chao-Ming Hung; Po-Huang Lee; Kun-Ming Rau; Hui-Ming Lee; Yutaka Yonemura
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-24

4.  Extrameningeal solitary fibrous tumors-surgery alone or surgery plus perioperative radiotherapy: A retrospective study from the global solitary fibrous tumor initiative in collaboration with the Sarcoma Patients EuroNet.

Authors:  Rick L Haas; Iris Walraven; Estelle Lecointe-Artzner; Winan J van Houdt; Dirk Strauss; Yvonne Schrage; Andrew J Hayes; Chandrajit P Raut; Mark Fairweather; Elizabeth H Baldini; Alessandro Gronchi; Laura De Rosa; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay Wunder; Michiel A J van de Sande; Augustinus D G Krol; Jacus Skoczylas; Claudia Sangalli; Silvia Stacchiotti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A New Primary in Parotid Gland with History of Treated Mediastinal Solitary Fibrous Tumour.

Authors:  Siddiq Ahmed; Syed Iftikhar Ali; Faizan Farid; Muhammad Ali; Waqas Ahmed; Talat Youseef
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2019-01-06

6.  A rare case of sinonasal solitary fibrous tumour in a patient with concurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  Nurul Anis Mohd Fauzi; Noor Idayu Ibrahim; Wan Faiziah Wan Abdul Rahman; Sharifah Emilia Tuan Sharif; Muhammad Nasri Abu Bakar; Ramiza Ramza Ramli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-10

7.  Retroperitoneal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A "Patternless" Tumor.

Authors:  D Myoteri; D Dellaportas; C Nastos; I Gioti; G Gkiokas; E Carvounis; T Theodosopoulos
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2017-09-12

8.  Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Stomach.

Authors:  Faisal Inayat; Qulsoom Hussain; Khurram Shafique; Abu Hurairah; Evan B Grossman
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2017-03-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.