Literature DB >> 27697306

The relationship between motor proficiency and mental health outcomes in young adults: A test of the Environmental Stress Hypothesis.

D Rigoli1, R T Kane2, V Mancini2, A Thornton3, M Licari3, B Hands4, F McIntyre5, J Piek2.   

Abstract

Growing evidence has highlighted the importance of motor proficiency in relation to psychosocial outcomes including self-perceived competence in various domains, perceived social support, and emotional areas such as anxiety and depression. The Environmental Stress Hypothesis-elaborated (Cairney, Rigoli, & Piek, 2013) is a proposed theoretical framework for understanding these relationships and recent studies have begun examining parts of this model using child and adolescent populations. However, the extent to which the relationships between these areas exist, persist or change during early adulthood is currently unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the Environmental Stress Hypothesis in a sample of 95 young adults aged 18-30years and examined the mediating role of physical self-worth and perceived social support in the relationship between motor proficiency and internalising symptoms. The McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (McCarron, 1997) was used to assess motor proficiency, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) provided a measure of internalising symptoms, and the Physical Self Perceptions Profile (Fox & Corbin, 1989) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley, 1988) were used to investigate the possible mediating role of physical self-worth and perceived social support respectively. Potential confounding variables such as age, gender and BMI were also considered in the analysis. Structural Equation Modelling revealed that perceived social support mediated the relationship between motor proficiency and internalising symptoms, whereas, the mediating role of physical self-worth was non-significant. The current results provide support for part of the model pathways as described in the Environmental Stress Hypothesis and suggest an important relationship between motor proficiency and psychosocial outcomes in young adults. Specifically, the results support previous literature regarding the significant role of perceived social support for mental well-being and suggest that an intervention that considers social support may also indirectly influence mental health outcomes in young adults who experience movement difficulties.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental health; Motor proficiency; Psychosocial outcomes; Young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697306     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  5 in total

1.  Poor Motor Performance - Do Peers Matter? Examining the Role of Peer Relations in the Context of the Environmental Stress Hypothesis.

Authors:  Olivia Gasser-Haas; Fabio Sticca; Corina Wustmann Seiler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-07

2.  Emotional and Behavioral Problems in 4- and 5-Year Old Children With and Without Motor Delays.

Authors:  M Christine Rodriguez; Terrance J Wade; Scott Veldhuizen; Cheryl Missiuna; Brian Timmons; John Cairney
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Reliability of the Adolescents and Adults Coordination Questionnaire into European Spanish.

Authors:  Laura Delgado-Lobete; Rebeca Montes-Montes; David Méndez-Alonso; José Antonio Prieto-Saborit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Moderating Effects of Physical Activity and Global Self-Worth on Internalizing Problems in School-Aged Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Yao-Chuen Li; Jeffrey D Graham; John Cairney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-19

5.  Decreased Balance Function in School-Aged Children with Behavioral Problems.

Authors:  Naomichi Matsunaga; Tadashi Ito; Yuji Ito; Jun Mizusawa; Yingzhi Gu; Shota Sanada; Yuya Shirai; Daiki Takahashi; Nobuhiko Ochi; Koji Noritake; Hideshi Sugiura
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.