Literature DB >> 27697256

Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses.

Daniel Carson1, Zaiwei Xu2, Elsinore Alexander2, Myoung Choi2, Zeyu Zhao2, Xin Hong2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the optical performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): the Acrysof IQ Panoptix (+2.17 diopter [D]/+3.25 D IOL), AT LISA Tri 839MP (+1.66 D/+3.33 D IOL), and Finevision Micro F (+1.75 D/+3.50 D IOL).
SETTING: Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: The 3 trifocal IOLs were compared using optical performance tests. To measure image quality, through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were generated for a model eye. To assess resolution, through-focus Badal images of an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart simulating viewing distances of infinity to 40 cm were recorded. To measure photic phenomena, simulated headlight images with a 50 μm pinhole target and a 5.0 mm pupil were obtained.
RESULTS: The MTF measurements showed similar near and distance peaks for the IOLs, but the optimum intermediate peak for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL was 60 cm versus 80 cm for the other 2 trifocal IOLs. Similarly, in bench Badal image testing, the optimum intermediate image was at 60 cm for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL and 80 cm for the other 2 IOLs. Overall, halos surrounding simulated headlight images were equivalent for the 3 IOLs.
CONCLUSIONS: In bench studies, the new +2.17 D/+3.25 D trifocal IOL showed equivalent or better performance in image quality, resolution, and photic phenomena compared with the +1.66 D/+3.33 D and +1.75 D/+3.50 D trifocal IOLs. The new IOL is expected to provide better intermediate vision at 60 cm, which is preferred for real-life tasks such as computer work, over the 80 cm intermediate distance offered by the other 2 trifocal IOLs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: All authors are employees of Alcon Research, Ltd.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697256     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  25 in total

1.  [Optical quality of three trifocal intraocular lens models : An optical bench comparison].

Authors:  R Khoramnia; T M Yildirim; T Tandogan; S Liebing; G Łabuz; C Y Choi; G Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Model of the light sword intraocular lens: in-vitro comparative studies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk; Narcyz Błocki; Anna Byszewska; Zbigniew Jaroszewicz; Karol Kakarenko; Katarzyna Kołacz; Michał Miler; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Marek Rękas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Mei-Fang Chu; Na Hui; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma; Yan Li; Cheng Pei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of visual outcomes between bilateral trifocal intraocular lenses and combined bifocal intraocular lenses with different near addition.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Tatsuhiko Sato; Chizuka Igarashi; Motoaki Yoshida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Results of a clinical evaluation of a trifocal intraocular lens in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Yuka Ota; Ken Hayashi; Chizuka Igarashi; Noriyuki Sasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Metric-Based Visual Acuity and Defocus Curve Simulation of Two Multifocal Intraocular Lens Models.

Authors:  Lin He; Xin Hong; Rajaraman Suryakumar; Ramesh Sarangapani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  César Vilar; Wilson Takashi Hida; André Lins de Medeiros; Klayny Rafaella Pereira Magalhães; Patrick Frensel de Moraes Tzelikis; Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Antônio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Milton Ruiz Alves; Walton Nosé
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-01

8.  Comparison of two laboratory-based systems for evaluation of halos in intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Daniel Carson; Sangyeol Lee; Elsinore Alexander; Xin Wei; Shinwook Lee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-21

9.  Long-Term Efficacy, Visual Performance and Patient Reported Outcomes with a Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Six-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Noemi Burguera; David P Piñero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; André Gustavo de Araújo Rolim; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Bruna Vieira Ventura; César Vilar; Mário Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.