Literature DB >> 27695703

Gene Mutations Associated with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Dhruvee Sangani1, Akiko Suzuki2, Helena VonVille3, James E Hixson4, Junichi Iwata5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a bilateral synovial joint between the mandible and the temporal bone of the skull. TMJ disorders (TMDs) are a set of complicated and poorly understood clinical conditions, in which TMDs are associated with a number of symptoms including pain and limited jaw movement. The increasing scientific evidence suggests that genetic factors play a significant role in the pathology of TMDs. However, the underlying mechanism of TMDs remains largely unknown.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the associated genes to TMDs in humans and animals.
METHODS: The literature search was conducted through databases including Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and PubMed (NLM) by using scientific terms for TMDs and genetics in March 2015. Additional studies were identified by searching bibliographies of highly relevant articles and Scopus (Elsevier).
RESULTS: Our systematic analyses identified 31 articles through literature searches. A total of 112 genes were identified to be significantly and specifically associated with TMDs.
CONCLUSION: Our systematic review provides a list of accurate genes associated with TMDs and suggests a genetic contribution to the pathology of TMDs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systematic Review; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Year:  2015        PMID: 27695703      PMCID: PMC5045035          DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1101583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OAlib        ISSN: 2333-9705


1. Introduction

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ; aka the jaw joint) is a bilateral synovial joint between the mandible and the temporal bone. The TMJ consists of an articular disc located in the articular cavity, the glenoid fossa of the temporal bone and the mandibular condyle, and is filled with synovial fluid. The TMJ is unique because it consists of two joints in one bone, which is required to work simultaneously, and it acquires two major movements of the mandibular condyles: hinge and sliding, which is important for smoothly opening/closing mouth and chewing. TMJ disorders (TMDs) are a sub-classification of musculoskeletal disorders that result from stomatognathic system defects, and affect the function of masticatory muscles, the TMJ, and its associated structures [1]. TMDs are a set of complicated and poorly understood clinical conditions, which are associated with a number of symptoms including pain and limited jaw movement. The estimated prevalence of TMDs ranges from 5% to 60% worldwide [2]. TMDs occur as an individual disorder or associated with other syndromes, and TMJ pain is the second most common musculoskeletal pain after chronic low back pain [3] [4]. Since the symptoms of TMDs include pain, inflammation, and limited jaw movements, the etiology of TMDs may be complex. In addition, the susceptibility to TMDs may not be equal; for example, it is known that women are more susceptible than men. Severe and/or chronic cases of TMDs often occur with pain, but in mild cases, pain may be resolved over time. The possible influence factors of TMDs are mechanical and/or psychic stresses, hormones, genes, ethnicity, social status, and gender [5]. It has been postulated that women and adolescents have a higher risk for TMDs, compared to men [6] [7]. TMJ osteoarthritis (OA) is also diagnosed at the later stages of severe cases of TMDs [8]. The extent of causative genes of TMDs has been of prime interest [9]. The increasing scientific evidence suggests that genetic factors may play a significant role in the pathology of TMDs [10] [11]. However, the underlying mechanism of TMDs remains largely unknown. In this study, we performed a systematic review to identify genes associated with TMDs. Currently, there are a few dental experts trained to precisely diagnose and treat this complex disorder. The treatment of TMDs has been very broad and general, including medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, physiotherapy, splints, biofeedback, and cognitive behavioral therapy. This study aims to provide precise information and highlight scientific literatures identifying genes associated with specific TMD conditions. Since not much research has been done on humans, animal studies have also been included in this systematic review. With knowledge of genetic studies, physicians and dentists can make diagnosis, tailor treatments, and predict susceptibility among people.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Eligibility Criteria for Systemic Review

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline and checklist was followed for this systematic review. Articles included in our systematic review met the following eligibility criteria: 1) described genes that are identified in TMDs; 2) were published as original articles (not as review articles, editorials, or comments); 3) were published in the English language; 4) were published between the years 2000 and 2015; and 5) specified TMD caused by gene mutations. Some articles were excluded from our systematic review because of one or more of the following reasons: a) gene mutations were not described in original articles; b) the type of TMDs (signs, symptoms, etc.) was not described or not diagnosed; c) the symptom was only pain, or the other symptoms and/or evaluations were not described; d) TMDs resulted from environmental factors; e) the studies had been done in other joints of the body; and f) others that include articles that failed to fit in any of the above criteria.

2.2. Information Sources and Search

The online databases that were searched included: Medline (Ovid), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), and EMBASE (Ovid). In addition, highly relevant citations were searched in Scopus (Elsevier) to determine if any unique studies were missed by the database searches. Bibliographies of highly relevant articles were also examined. The Primary Excel Workbook for Systematic Reviews was used to track all search strategies and results, as described previously [12]. All search strategies are listed in full in Table S1 and Table S2. The search was limited to studies from 2000 through 2015 as genetic studies have become more technologically advanced in recent years, and very few genetic studies on TMDs were conducted before the year 2000.

2.3. Study Selection and Data Collection

RefWorks (Proquest) was used to store all citations found during the entire search process. The Primary Excel Workbook for Systematic Reviews (VonVille, Helena M. Primary Excel Workbook for Systematic Reviews, http://libguides.sph.uth.tmc.edu/excel_SR_workbook) was used to screen titles and abstracts of items found through database search. Titles and abstracts were screened by the first author (DS). The full text of articles not excluded was retrieved and reviewed by the first and second authors (DS, AS) with all data related to both screening and reviewing recorded in the Primary Excel Workbook. The data collected were displayed as a descriptive narrative. A codebook for data extraction from eligible articles was developed. The data elements that were extracted for the codebook included citation information, study level information (characteristics and results), and quality level information.

3. Results and Discussions

Nearly 900 unique articles were identified using the search strategies described above (see Figure 1 and Supplemental Information, Tables S1 and S2 for the database search strategies). Approximately 61% of the articles included were published after 2010. Interestingly, most of the articles included were published in 2014. Among the articles included for review (n = 31), 10 studies were done on humans while 21 studies were conducted on animal models (Table 1 and Table 2). One study conducted research on both mouse and human subjects [13]. 18 out of 31 articles conducted research on mice while 1 article studied in porcine, 2 articles in rats, and 1 article in rabbits. The articles from 2000–2015 covered most of the research related to genes in TMDs. Eight studies were conducted in 2014 and 2 studies were conducted in 2015. The demographic characteristics among the human studies were very different. Among the human studies, different ethnic groups such as Koreans, Japanese, Brazilian, Finnish, and Turkish populations were studied (Table 1). Three articles did not mention the ethnicity of the population studied [14] [15] [16]. One study indicated that in the miscegenetic Brazilian population, the age was significantly associated with TMDs [17]. Two studies were carried out only in women to determine the association of the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene with TMDs. One study [18] indicated the contribution of ESR1 on TMDs whereas another study [19] suggested no association of ESR1 with TMD symptoms such as clicks, crepitus, and bone erosion. Females are more affected by TMJ pain and degeneration due to the effects of β-estradiol on the TMJ [18]. Three studies show no statistically significant changes in candidate TMD causative genes: MAOA (monoamine oxidase-A), ESR1 (estrogen receptor alpha), and TNF (tumor necrosis factor alpha) [16] [19] [20]. Several polymorphisms have been described in the promoter region of MMP genes, and these polymorphisms modify gene expression and function of the MMPs. MMP1 (matrix metalloproteinase 1) polymorphism, but not MMP3 and MMP9 polymorphisms, is associated with osteophyte and erosion of the mandibular condyle. In the Brazilian MMP1 2G/2G homozygous subjects, the probability of developing degeneration of the mandibular condyle is 2.47 times higher than that in the MMP1 1G/2G and 1G/1G individuals [17]. ADAMTS5 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motif 5) is involved in deformation of the articular disc associated with internal derangement and osteoarthritis in the TMJ [14]. Thus, proteinases contribute to degrade the articular disc and the surface of the mandibular condyle during the progression of TMDs. Homozygous polymorphism in ANKH (a human homolog of the murine progressive ankylosis gene, ank) more likely develops TMJ closed lock compared to controls [13]. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex is a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) which is present on the surface of immune cells. Polymorphism in HLA-DRB1 (MHC class II, DR beta 1) allele is associated with erosion of the mandibular condyle [21]. These findings suggest that inflammation and autoimmune diseases may affect the progression of TMDs. Polymorphism in the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) gene is involved in the pathogenesis of TMJ synovial chondromatosis that is a rare proliferative disorder characterized by the formation of cartilaginous or osteocartilaginous nodules in synovium and articular cavities [15]. A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified 22 independent loci showing association with degeneration of the mandibular condyle in East Asian populations. Among them, TSPAN9 (tetraspanin 9) polymorphism showed strongest association with TMD [22]. TSPAN9 mediates a signal transduction that plays a role in the regulation of cell development, activation, growth, and motility. Thus, some cell signaling pathways may be involved in the pathogenesis of TMDs. Although most of the studies have been done in small sample sizes, 28 out of 31 studies identified genes to be causal or associated with TMDs. This finding can lead us to believe that gene mutations are a causative factor for the incidence of TMDs.
Figure 1

Prisma flowchart for selection of articles.

Table 1

Human studies.

Author publication year country of studyStudy population characteristicsDiagnosis diagnostic criteriaGene(s) studiedResultsStudy limitations
Planello [17]2011BrazilMean Age of Cases42.82 ± 14.96N = 115: F = NR, M = NRMean Age of Controls38.04 ± 14.17N = 117: F = NR, M = NREthnic status: BrazilianOsteophytes, erosion, avascular necrosis, subchondral cyst, loose bodies, OACT, Interview, MRIMMP1MMP3MMP9Only MMP1 2G/2G genotype was found to be significant (P < 0.003). Effect of age on TMJ degeneration was significant (P < 0.002)Small sample size to detect association of MMP3 gene
Huang [13]2011JapanMean Age of Cases15.5 to 69.7N = 55: F = 44, M = 11Mean Age of ControlsNRN = NR: F = NR, M = NREthnic status: JapaneseTMJ clicking (disc displacement with reduction) or closed lock (disc displacement without reduction) and not having previous history of trauma, neoplasm and/or surgery in the TMJ; TMJ clicking used as controls Clinical evaluation, MRIANKHTwo alleles of ANKH-OR polymorphism were identified. ANKH-OR homozygotes were more likely to develop closed lock compared to controls (P = 0.011)Calculation of minimal sample size was unattainable, Low response rate could have resulted in sampling bias, application of cohort study would have explored the influence of age on TMD, high percentage of patients were unwilling to take a blood test for assessment, study failed to indicate equivalence between fibrous ankylosis in mice and closed lock in humans
Kim [19]2010South KoreaMean Age of Cases31.45 ± 15.25 yearsN = 74: F = 50, M = 24Mean Age of Controls35.58 ± 12.47N = 64: F = 41, M = 23Ethnic Status: KoreanMPDS, IDD with reduction, IDD without reduction, OA, Osteoarthrosis RDC/TMDESR1No statistical difference between study group and control group (P > 0.5)Small sample size
Ribeiro-Dasilva [18]2009BrazilAge for Cases 18 – 44N = 300: F = 300, M = 0Age for Controls31.1 ± 8.36N = 100: F = 100, M = 0Ethnic Status: White, Afro-American, AsiaticDisc displacement with and without reduction, with limited mouth opening, without reduction and without limited mouth opening RDC/TMDESR1Presence of [GC] haplotype in ERα gene was higher in TMD with pain compared to control group (P = 0.0028)Small sample size, admixed Brazilian population limits generalizability of data, only data from articular pain included and not muscular pain
Matsumoto [14]2008JapanMean Age of Cases50.11N = 9: F = 8, M = 1Mean Age of Controls65.5N = 2: F = 2, M = 0Ethnic Status: NRID, OANRADAMTS-5ADAMTS-5 is involved in deformation of the TMJ discs with ID and OA (P < 0.01)Small sample size, limited use of TMJ disc cells
Helenius [21]2004FinlandMean Age of Cases43.57N = 84: F = 56, M = 28Mean Age of Controls: NRN = 100: F = NR,M = NREthnic status: FinnishRA, MCTD, AS, SPA ARA 1987 for RA, Alarcon-Segovia for MCTD, MNYC for AS, ESSG for SPAHLA-DRB1In the whole patient population, HLA-DRB1 allele was significantly associated with TMJ erosions (P = 0.0014)Controls were not clinically or radiologically examined
Li [15]2014ChinaMean Age of Cases NRN = 3: F = NR, M = NRMean Age of ControlsNRN = 3: F = NR, M = NREthnic status: NRSynovial chondromatosis for cases; Open Reduction for controls NRFGF2FGF2 was involved in the pathogenesis of synovial chondromatosis (P < 0.01)NR
Yamaguchi [22]2015JapanMean Age of CasesJapanese 25.6Koreans 28.5N of Japanese = 105:F = 93, M = 12N of Koreans = 41:F = 23, M = 18Mean Age of ControlsJapanese 25.6Koreans 28.5N of Japanese = 193F = 141, M = 53N of Koreans = 181F = 70, M = 111)Ethnic status: East AsianOsteophytes, erosion, flattening of TMJ bone Interview, CT, MRI, Panoramic RadiographAPOL3APPCCDC81EXT2FRMD4AFSTL4LOC100506274MRC2N4BP1OXR1PCSK5SLC24A4THRBTPSAN9ULK4ZNF618All the genes were found to be significantly associated. TSPAN9 showed strongest association (P = 8.1 × 10−6)Small sample size, age and gender differed between Japanese and Korean data sets
Etoz [20]2006TurkeyMean Age of Cases21.1 ± 12.1N = 98; F = 75, M = 23Mean Age of Controls22.9 ± 10.1N = 132: F = 104, M = 28Ethnic Status: TurkishDifficulty or pain while opening mouth, locking of jaw, pain, noises, unusual bite, frequent headache, MRI findings-NRAnamnestic Questionnaire clinical investigation, MRITNFTNFα-308GA polymorphism is not associated with TMDNRNo radiological diagnosis
Mutlu [16]2005TurkeyMean Age of Cases:22.8 ± 3.6 years;N = 93; F = 73, M = 20Mean Age of Controls21.10 ± 3.7N = 91: F = 61, M = 30Ethnic Status: NRDifficulty or pain while opening mouth, locking of jaw, pain, noises, unusual bite, frequent headache, MRI findings-NRAnamnestic Questionnaire clinical investigation, MRIMAOANo evidence to support the involvement of MAOA gene in TMDNRNo radiological diagnosis

NR: Not Reported; RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; MCTD: Mixed Connective Tissue disease; AS: Ankylosing Spondylitis; SPA: Spondyloarthropathy; ARA: American Rheumatism Association; MNYC: Modified New York Criteria; ESSG: European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group; ID: Internal Derangement; OA: Osteoarthritis; MPDS: Myofacial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computed Tomography.

Table 2

Animal studies.

Author publication yearAnimal studiesTMD condition method of inducingGene studiedResultsStudy limitations
Jing [25]2014MiceTMD Mutant condylar cartilageConditional Osxknockout (cKO) mice were generated by crossing Osx-loxP mice to Aggrecan-Cre mice. Cre activity induced by Tamoxifen injectionOsxDefect in coupling chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in cKO mice, calcified cartilage in hypertrophic zone, few signs of endochondral bone formation, disorganized intramembranous boneNR
Ishizuka [26]2014MiceOA-like changesMechanical stressSamp8Abnormal condylar organization, condylar degeneration, decreased chondroprogenitor cell proliferation and increased cell deathNR
Li [27]2014MiceDisc DisorderKnock-in mouse line with replacement of mouse Shox2 by the human SHOX coding sequenceShox2Genetic association with congenital articular disc degeneration, suggesting that SHOX2 represents a susceptible locus for OA of the TMJNR
Jiao [28]2014MiceCartilage degradationGreen fluorescent protein mice were crossed with Cre miceTgfb1Abnormalities in the subchondral bone which induced cartilage degradationSmall sample size
Inman [29]2013MiceSyngnathia, agenesis of TMJCrossbreedingFoxc1Foxc1−/− mutant mice exhibit bilateral fusion of the upper jaw zygomatic complex to the dentary bone (syngnathia)NR
Ricks [30]2013MiceOAHeterozygous mice (Dmm/+) of a C3H strain were crossed to produce wildtype(+/+) and Dmm/+ miceCol2a1TMJ in Dmm/+ mice displayed premature articular cartilage and greater defects in chondrocyte arrangement, known biomarkers of OA were significantly expressed (P < 0.01)NR
Yasuda [31]2012MiceAbnormal endochondral ossification and Class 3 dental malocclusion, shortening of cranial baseKnock-in mutation in exon 7 of Fgfr3 geneFgfr3Articular disc fused with temporal bone, articular surface developed fissures, defects in endochondral ossification, abnormal glenoid fossa, defective trabecular bone formationNR
Purcell [32]2012MiceNRInactivation of genes Spry1, Spry2Spry1Spry2Combined inactivation of Spry1 and Spry2 genes leads to absence of glenoid fossa and overgrowth of lateral pterygoid and temporalis musclesNR
Huang [13]2011MiceInternal derangementCommercially bred ank/ank mutant mice were purchasedAnkFibrous ankylosis, narrower and/or ankylosed superior and inferior synovial cavities filled with fibrous connective tissue throughout the entire joint spaceUtilization of 3-to-5 month old mice in this study might be responsible for the absence of erosive changes in the TMJ.
Embree [33]2011MiceOADifferential gene expression analysis was performed with RNA extracted from 3-week old WT and bgn−/+; fmod−/−4833416E15RikAebp1, AhspAngptl7, ArskBace1, BgnCartpt, Col2a1Col9a1, Col9a3Fmod, Hapln1LOC 344564Matn3, Mrpl30Pfn1, PtprvRps19, Sfrp1Slc4a1, Tspan33The microarray analysis discovered 22 genes differentially expressed in bgn−/+; fmod −/− mouse model that could be involved in disease initiation. 5 genes (Cartpt, Sfrp1, Arsk, Slc4a1, Ptprv) changed in the mouse models and are related to osteoclast f unction/differentiation and bone turnoverNR
Purcell [34]2009MiceTargeted disruption of the Gli2 zinc finger domain (Gli2zfd/zfd) CrossbreedingGli2TMJ disk was missing, small condyle, cellular organization of growth plate was lostNR
Gu [35]2008MiceInactivation of Shox2Shox2 conventional knock out mice and mice with floxed Shox2 allele were generated. Wnt1-Cre;Shox2F/F obtained by matingShox2Dysplasia of glenoid fossa, congenitalTMJ ankylosisNR
Shibukawa [36]2006MiceAbsence of articular discAbsence of joint cavitiesCrossbreeding and induced mutationIhhMandible development was defective, condyle zonal architecture was abnormal, complete absence of functional disc and joint cavityNR
Meng [37]2005MiceOASurgical lesion on discs, gene expression profileAngpt12, Aqp3Baalc, Casr, Cav, Chad, Cldn11, ClsClu, Crabp2Csrp2, Dkk3Dpt, Egln3Eln, Gda, Gda, Hig1Hspca, Htr2aIgfbp5, Igfbp6Il11ra1, Lg11Lg11, LibMeox2, Mmp3Nb11, NovNr1d1, Nt5Octnl, PlatPrelp, Prrx2Pthlh, Scrg1Serpina1, Sfrp4Sod3, Spin2cSpp2, TgfbiThbs4, Tnfrsf11bTnmdSwelling, superficial fibrillation, early osteoarthritic changesNR
Xu [38]2003MiceCartilage DegenerationHeterozygous cho/+ mutant micechoAt age 6 months OA-like changes became more severe, including flattening of the condylar head, loss of proteoglycans, and a reduced hypertrophic zoneNR
Gu [39]2014MiceApoptotic cellsWnt1-Cre; Bmpr1aF/F embryos obtained by crossing Wnt1-Cre; Bmpr1aF/+ with Bmpr1aF/F lineBmpr1aAgenesis Failed formation of functional fibrocartilage layer, Failure of disc separation from hypoplastic condyleNR
Li [40]2014MiceDysplasiaCross of Wnt-Cre mice with pMes-stopShox2 miceShox2Increased number of apoptotic cells in the glenoid fossa causing glenoid fossa dysplasia, dysplasia of condyleNR
Wang [41]2014MiceTMJ CartilageDegeneration Crossbreeding to generateβ-catenin(ex3)Col2ER, Tamoxifen administeredCtnnb1Significant reduction in TMJ joint space, cartilage thickness was significantly decreased, increase in cartilage degrading enzymes, OA-like phenotypeNR
Meng [42]2007RatsOASurgically, lesions created in discsAqp1Aqp3High expression and different localization of AQP3 in OA cartilage. No significant difference between OA and normal controlsNR
Yu [43]2012RatsCondyle cartilageDegenerationOcclusal treatment carried out to induce degenerative changes in the mandibular condylar cartilageIgf1Gfr1Igfbp3Obvious OA-like changes were observed in 2 week female experimental group than those in control group (P < 0.01) and 2 week male experimental group (P < 0.05), Expression of IGF1 in the 2 week females was lower than males (P < 0.01), IGFR1 was significantly lower in 2 week female (P < 0.05) but increased in 2 week male experimental group, IGFBP3 in all female subgroups was significantly lower than that in their male counterpartsDifferences in occlusion between rats and humans
Asakawa-Tanne [44]2015PorcineDisc indentationPorcine cranial heads were subjected to cyclic loadingCox2Il1bMmp1Mmp3Mmp9Compromised lubrication in TMJ is associated with altered frictional properties and surface wear of condylar cartilageAmount and nature of loading used in the study do not represent the actual TMJ dynamics in vivo
Ge [45]2009RabbitCartilage destructionPrimary rabbit condylar chondrocytes were treated with IL-β, purified WNT5A protein, or both and transfected with Wnt5a expression vectorWnt5aWNT5A is associated with cartilage destruction by promoting expression of MMP1, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13NR

NR: Not reported; OA: Osteoarthritis.

In spite of extensive attempts, the molecular mechanism of TMDs is largely unknown because of the complex interaction of genes with other confounding factors like hormones, age, ethnicity, and environment. The presence of more than one symptom may be interdependent and act as a confounding factor [19]. Due to heterogeneity of symptoms, there are a lot of variations in diagnosis of TMDs worldwide. The appropriate treatments for TMD can only be initiated with a precise diagnosis. A number of imaging techniques including ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), arthrography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been adopted to confirm the diagnosis made by history taking and clinical examination. In 1992, The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was proposed as the basis for diagnosis of these complicated disorders [23]. In 2004, RDS/TMD has been replaced with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD) because the validity of RDC/TMD was not sufficient enough in clinic [24]. Only 2 studies used the RDC/TMD diagnostic criteria, and none of the clinical studies have used the latest DC/TMD criteria yet. This systematic review has much strength in identifying causative genes and their genetic interactions; however, it has a few limitations such as the year range of 2000–2015 and the English language. All the human studies had more number of females participating in the study. The participation of unequal numbers of gender might affect the validity of the results that women are more susceptible to TMDs. In addition, due to a broad classification and diagnostic criteria of TMDs, a potent detection bias cannot be ignored. Publication bias also can be the reason for limited literature being published. Future research with larger sample sizes will enable us to better understand genetic association with TMDs. Recent advances have introduced new techniques like GWAS that can help us discover genes associated with TMDs.

4. Conclusion

From a public health perspective, there is an urgent need to address TMDs and determine their causative factors. Despite different diagnostic criteria used, most of the included studies find associations between genes and TMDs. Future studies should incorporate objective diagnostic methods such as DC/TMD for TMD diagnosis to yield consistent results. Understanding the molecular mechanism is important to individualize treatment for TMDs in order to alleviate the overall burden of TMDs. Further studies to identify genes associated with TMDs will enable us to specifically diagnose TMDs and improve the quality of treatment. These findings will also help us understand why there is a gender disparity in TMDs and who may be more likely to suffer from TMDs.
  43 in total

1.  Muenke syndrome mutation, FgfR3P²⁴⁴R, causes TMJ defects.

Authors:  T Yasuda; H D Nah; J Laurita; T Kinumatsu; Y Shibukawa; T Shibutani; N Minugh-Purvis; M Pacifici; E Koyama
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  TMJ degeneration in SAMP8 mice is accompanied by deranged Ihh signaling.

Authors:  Y Ishizuka; Y Shibukawa; M Nagayama; R Decker; T Kinumatsu; A Saito; M Pacifici; E Koyama
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Activation of β-catenin signalling leads to temporomandibular joint defects.

Authors:  M Wang; S Li; W Xie; J Shen; H J Im; J D Holz; M Wang; T G Diekwisch; D Chen
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Microarray analysis of differential gene expression in temporomandibular joint condylar cartilage after experimentally induced osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Juanhong Meng; Xuchen Ma; Dalong Ma; Caimin Xu
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Effects of enzymatic degradation after loading in temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Y Asakawa-Tanne; S Su; R Kunimatsu; N Hirose; T Mitsuyoshi; Y Okamoto; E Tanaka; K Tanne; K Tanimoto
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Shox2-deficiency leads to dysplasia and ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint in mice.

Authors:  Shuping Gu; Na Wei; Ling Yu; Jian Fei; YiPing Chen
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Osteoarthritis-like changes and decreased mechanical function of articular cartilage in the joints of mice with the chondrodysplasia gene (cho).

Authors:  L Xu; C M Flahiff; B A Waldman; D Wu; B R Olsen; L A Setton; Y Li
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-09

8.  Osteoarthritis in temporomandibular joint of Col2a1 mutant mice.

Authors:  M L Ricks; J T Farrell; D J Falk; D W Holt; M Rees; J Carr; T Williams; B A Nichols; L C Bridgewater; P R Reynolds; D L Kooyman; R E Seegmiller
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 9.  Genetic contributions to pain: a review of findings in humans.

Authors:  R B Fillingim; M R Wallace; D M Herbstman; M Ribeiro-Dasilva; R Staud
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.511

10.  Increased risk of temporomandibular joint closed lock: a case-control study of ANKH polymorphisms.

Authors:  Boyen Huang; Katsu Takahashi; Tomoko Sakata; Honoka Kiso; Manabu Sugai; Kazuma Fujimura; Akira Shimizu; Shinji Kosugi; Tosiya Sato; Kazuhisa Bessho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Computational Data Mining Strategy to Identify the Common Genetic Markers of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders and Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Vijayashree Priyadharsini Jayaseelan; Paramasivam Arumugam
Journal:  Glob Med Genet       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Genes and microRNAs associated with mouse cleft palate: A systematic review and bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Nada Abdallah; Mona Gajera; Goo Jun; Peilin Jia; Zhongming Zhao; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Gene datasets associated with mouse cleft palate.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Goo Jun; Nada Abdallah; Mona Gajera; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-03-14

4.  MicroRNA-374a, -4680, and -133b suppress cell proliferation through the regulation of genes associated with human cleft palate in cultured human palate cells.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Aimin Li; Mona Gajera; Nada Abdallah; Musi Zhang; Zhongming Zhao; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  MicroRNA-655-3p and microRNA-497-5p inhibit cell proliferation in cultured human lip cells through the regulation of genes related to human cleft lip.

Authors:  Mona Gajera; Neha Desai; Akiko Suzuki; Aimin Li; Musi Zhang; Goo Jun; Peilin Jia; Zhongming Zhao; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  MicroRNA-124-3p suppresses mouse lip mesenchymal cell proliferation through the regulation of genes associated with cleft lip in the mouse.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Hiroki Yoshioka; Dima Summakia; Neha G Desai; Goo Jun; Peilin Jia; David S Loose; Kenichi Ogata; Mona V Gajera; Zhongming Zhao; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Crucial Roles of microRNA-16-5p and microRNA-27b-3p in Ameloblast Differentiation Through Regulation of Genes Associated With Amelogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Akiko Suzuki; Hiroki Yoshioka; Teng Liu; Aania Gull; Naina Singh; Thanh Le; Zhongming Zhao; Junichi Iwata
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.