Literature DB >> 22991492

Gender difference in prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders: a retrospective study on 243 consecutive patients.

Bora Bagis1, Elif Aydogan Ayaz, Sedanur Turgut, Rukiye Durkan, Mutlu Özcan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prevalence of the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) among patients with TMD symptoms.
METHODS: Between September 2011 and December 2011, 243 consecutive patients (171 females, 72 males, mean age 41 years) who were referred to the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon were examined physically and completed a questionnaire regarding age, gender, social status, general health, antidepressant drug usage, dental status, limited mouth opening, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds, and parafunctions (bruxism, clenching). The data were analyzed using the chi-square test and binary logistic regression model (alpha = 0.05).
RESULTS: With a frequency of 92%, pain in the temporal muscle was the most common symptom, followed by pain during mouth opening (89%) in both genders. TMJ pain at rest, pain in the masseter muscle, clicking, grinding, and anti-depressant use were significantly more frequent in females than males. Age (p=0.006; odds ratio 0.954; 95% CI 0.922-0.987) and missing teeth (p=0.003; odds ratio 3.753; 95% CI 1.589-8.863) had significant effects on the prevalence of TMD.
CONCLUSION: Females had TMD signs and symptoms more frequently than males in the study population. The most common problem in both genders was pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental health.; epidemiology; oral parafunctions; orofacial pain; temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22991492      PMCID: PMC3444974          DOI: 10.7150/ijms.4474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Sci        ISSN: 1449-1907            Impact factor:   3.738


INTRODUCTION

It is generally accepted that the etiology of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) is multifactorial, and is related to a number of dental and medical conditions, such as occlusion, posture, parafunctional habits, restorative procedures, orthodontic treatment, emotional stress, trauma, anatomy of the disc, pathophysiology of the muscles, genetic and psychosocial factors, age, and gender 1,2. Typical signs and symptoms of TMD are pain, limited mouth opening, joint sounds, mandibular deviation, and chewing disability. These symptoms may exist alone or in combination 2. Pain is the most important symptom of TMD for both patients and clinicians, as it is often the main reason why patients seek for medical help 3. Most patients suffer from pain during mandibular movements, at rest, or on palpation of the muscles. Pain results from the changes in muscle activity that limit the movements of the mandible and protect it from further damage, while trying to promote healing 4. TMD can also occur as a consequence of pain of non-dental origin in the orofacial region, including the head, face, and related structures 4. TMD is a possible cause of headaches, as a positive correlation was found between TMD and the prevalence of headaches 4. Fortunately, the treatment of symptomatic TMD significantly decreases headache complaints 5,6. Although limited mouth opening is generally a result of painful mandibular movement, it may or may not be accompanied by pain. In general, mouth opening of less than 30 mm is considered limited 7. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds, such as clicking or crepitation, are one of the most common symptoms, followed by headache 8. Since sound is not always considered as a problem, but rather as a risk factor, TMJ clicking may be a normal variant rather than a disorder 9. Changes in condyle morphology, disk displacement, and mechanical disk derangements may cause TMJ clicking without pain or significant dysfunction. Epidemiological studies have shown an increased prevalence of TMJ sounds among patients between 15 and 25 years old 10. Studies have identified changes in occlusion, such as angle malocclusion, crossbite, open bite, occlusal interference, excessive overjet, and overbite, crowding, midline discrepancies, and missing teeth, as predisposing, triggering, or perpetuating factors for TMD 11. The lateral bite forces between the retruded and intercuspal contact positions, as well as unilateral crossbite, are possible local risk factors for developing TMD 10. Parafunctional habits such as bruxism, tooth clenching, gum chewing, biting foreign objects, and prolonged nail biting might increase the risk of developing TMD 10,11. Parafunctional activities are usually harmless, until the forces exerted exceed the structural tolerance 7. Bruxism and clenching reportedly lead to joint space reduction, followed by disc compression, and resulting pain in the masticatory muscles 9. In addition, psychological factors have been closely linked to TMD and may be a component of the clinical presentation. Increased levels of somatization; i.e., depression or anxiety, affect TMD sufferers negatively compared to people without TMD 12. Epidemiology is a discipline that evaluates the frequency and distribution of conditions related to disease or health in a population. Epidemiological studies of TMD are important for amassing knowledge of symptomatic complexes and therapeutic approaches that might help to establish prevention and control programs 3. Therefore, this study evaluated the prevalence of the signs and symptoms in TMD patients and investigated whether gender influences its prevalence.

METHODS

Subjects

Data were collected from 243 consecutive patients (171 females, 72 males; mean age 41 (range 14-59) years) seeking treatment for TMD at Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Trabzon. Patients who joined the study gave informed consent. The Ethics Committee in Human Research of Karadeniz Technical University approved the research protocol (Number: 2011.91.21.2). Patients with fibromyalgia, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, migraine, atypical odontalgia, and cervical and neuropathic pain and those with a history of TMD treatment were excluded from the study. Patients were initially questioned using a questionnaire based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) 11 including the following items: age, gender, social status, general health (diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, arthritis, etc.), antidepressant use, dental status (missing/filled teeth, fixed/removable prosthetic restorations), occlusion type, limited mouth opening, TMJ sounds, and parafunctions (bruxism, clenching).

Clinical examination

A history was taken and the patients were examined clinically, including the muscles and TMJ. The physical examination followed the order of the questionnaire items; i.e., inspection, palpation, and an intraoral examination. The masticatory, subhyoid, suprahyoid, and head and neck muscle were examined. Tense areas and localized pain were identified. The masseter was palpated at its attachments to the zygomatic arch and angle of the mandible. The temporalis, in both the temporal fossa and intraorally along the ascending ramus of the mandible, and the medial pterygoid were examined bimanually, by placing one finger externally at the medial aspect of the angle of the mandible and the other intraorally in the lingual vestibule in the retromolar region. While the lateral pterygoid muscle was palpated behind the tuber maxilla in a medial direction, the digastric muscle was palpated at the mid-point between the angle of the mandible and the jaw. Mouth opening was measured between the central incisors using a ruler. TMJ sounds were evaluated with a stereoscope and recorded as no sound, clicks, or crepitation. One examiner examined all of the subjects and a second reviewer controlled whether all of the questions were understood and answered in full.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical package SPSS for Windows, version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of variables in TMD patients according to gender and binary logistic regression model tests were used to identify dominant factors. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all statistical tests. The confidence level was set at 95%.

RESULTS

The study population had more females (n=171, mean age 35 years) than males (n=72n 30%; mean age 41 years). Class I malocclusion (55% females, 20% males) was most common, followed by Classes II (11% females, 6% males) and III (4% females, 3% males). In both genders, pain in the temporal muscle was the most common symptom, with a frequency of 92%, followed by pain during mouth opening (89%). TMJ pain at rest and pain in the masseter muscle were significantly more frequent in the females than males (Table 1). Among TMJ sounds and parafunctions, clicking (p=0.044) and grinding (p=0.013) were significantly more frequent in females than in males (Table 2).
Table 1

Incidence of TMD symptoms and differences between genders. *Significant at p<0.05.

SymptomFemaleMaleSignificanceIncidence (%)
Pain during opening mouth12055p=0.35272
Pain during mastication11250p=0.65566
Headache14963p=0.187
Earache14765p=0.40787
TMJ pain at rest12944p=0.018*71
Pain in masseter muscle11334p=0.009*39
Pain in temporal muscle15867p=0.85892
Table 2

Incidence of TMJ sounds, parafunctions, and differences between genders. *Significant at p<0.05.

SymptomFemaleMaleSignificanceIncidence (%)
Clicking7421p=0.044*39
Crepitation88p=0.0876
Clenching9637p=0.57354
Grinding407p=0.013*19
Antidepressant use was reported by 16% of the patients and females reported significantly more use than males (p=0.021). Limited mouth opening was observed in 89% of the patients, but it was not significantly different between the genders (p=0.219). Hyperactivity in the temporal muscle was less frequent (8%; p>0.05; Table 3).
Table 3

Incidence of other TMD symptoms, antidepressant use, and differences between genders. *Significant at p<0.05.

SymptomFemaleMaleSignificanceIncidence (%)
Hyperactivity in temporal muscle128p=0.3118
Limited mouth opening15067p=0.21989
Antidepressant drug use2118p=0.021*16
No significant difference was found between the dental status groups according to gender (p>0.05; Table 4).
Table 4

Dental status and differences between genders. *Significant at p<0.05.

Dental statusFemaleMaleSignificanceIncidence (%)
Missing teeth9537p=0.57554
Unerupted teeth3714p=0.86320
Teeth with fillings8318p=0.71337
Fixed partial denture3417p=0.60520
Removable partial denture135p=0.8587
Complete denture55p=0.1504
Age (p=0.006; odds ratio 0.954; 95% CI 0.922-0.987) and missing teeth (p=0.003; odds ratio 3.753; 95% CI 1.589-8.863) had significant effects on the prevalence of TMD (Table 5).
Table 5

The effects of variables on TMD according to binary logistic regression model tests. *Significant at p<0.05.

VariablesBS.E.WalddfSignificanceExp (B)95% CI.
LowerUpper
Age-,047,0177.5541,006*,954,922,987
Wisdom tooth-19.55314373.941,0001,999,000,000.
Missing tooth1.322,4389.0961,003*3.7531.5898.863
Filling-21.2234814.836,0001,996,000,000.
Fixed partial denture2.23316747.565,00011.0009.332,000.
Removable partial denture-22.06814094.323,0001,999,000,000.
Complete denture20.98214094.323,0001,9991295147073.969,000.
Drug use38.1559851.574,0001,99737206949702489390.000,000.
Constant2.6931.1675.3231,02114.776

DISCUSSION

A number of factors have been studied in relation to TMD, such as dental status, number of teeth, parafunctions, clicking and locking of the jaws, and a history of trauma 2. It has been difficult to characterize TMD owing to the large number of symptoms and signs, and the variation in the number and types manifested in any one patient. A systematic review of clinical studies reported that age, gender, and psychological factors were associated with TMD. Several retrospective clinical studies have investigated the relationship between the risk factors and TMD. Michelotti et al. examined the effect of oral parafunctions on TMD in 557 patients and concluded that diurnal parafunctional activities, especially daytime tooth clenching/grinding, were risk factors for subgroups of TMD and myofascial pain 13. In a study of 87 patients with psychological distress, Lee et al. found jaw disability 14. In another study, malocclusion and orthodontic treatment were not associated with TMD 15, while Hagag et al. found that occlusion and prosthodontic treatment influenced TMD 16. This study studied the gender effect on the prevalence of signs and symptoms of TMD primarily. Generally, epidemiological studies have documented a greater fre­quency and severity of TMD in females than in males 11,17. Although these differences have been explained by behavioral, psychosocial, hormonal, and constitutional factors, no conclusions have been drawn 11,15. In our study, females were found to have a higher risk of TMD (2.3:1) than males, yet the results were not significant. Manfredini et al. made similar observations in a study of 433 patients in whom the risk ratio was 2.6:1 (276 females, 73.2%; 101 males, 26.8%) 17. Patients with TMD generally suffer from different kinds of pain. Our study also demonstrated a strong relationship between TMD and orofacial pain. TMD-related orofacial pain is generally seen as a chronic, regional pain in the form of headaches or earaches. Our questionnaire indentified pain localized during opening mouth, mastication, or at rest, headache, and earache, and pain in temporal or masseter muscle. The patients mostly reported pain in the temporal region (92%), followed by headache (87%). Cooper et al. examined the presence of symptoms and signs of TMD in 4528 patients and reported that 96.1% of the patients complained of TMJ pain, followed by headache (79.3%) 2. Although our study population was smaller than that of Cooper et al. 2, similar trends were observed. The incidence of TMD pain in females has been studied widely 3. While Velly et al. reported that females had approximately three times the risk of myofascial pain than males in a series 83 patients 18, Karibe et al. investigated 71 patients and found that chewing significantly increased the pain in patients with a history of chronic masticator muscle pain, but also in females with no such history 19. Moreover, the increased pain persisted significantly longer in females. According to our results, pain in the joint region in the resting position and in the masseter muscle was significantly greater in females than in males. This might be related to biological, anatomical, or hormonal factors acting alone or in combination in females. Temporomandibular joint sounds, in the form of clicks and crepitus, are other signs and symptoms of TMD 8,20. In our series, joint sounds were infrequent symptoms: 39% of the patients had clicking and 6% crepitus. In a similar study of 40 patients, clicking was observed in 40% and crepitus in 15% 21. Although we found no significant difference between the genders regarding these signs, Troeltzsch et al. reported a significant difference in TMJ clicking in females compared to males in a series of 1031 patients 22. In our study, a significant difference was found between genders in terms of clicking sounds, which were nearly four times more frequent in females than in males. Painful jaw movements frequently lead to a reduction in mouth opening, which causes problems while chewing and social difficulty for the patients. Clinically, limited mouth opening poses problems for dental treatments. In general, the mouth opening is greater in males than in females 23,24. This difference may be the result of the significant difference in mandibular length between males and females 21. Our results also indicated that the patients with limited mouth opening were mostly females (61%) compared with males (28%), which might affect dental treatments. Parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, and grinding are considered among the important etiological causes of TMD 18,25. In patients with bruxism, the habit of pressing or grinding the teeth changes the lubrication mechanism of the articular structures due to the overload on the articular surfaces, altering the TMJ biomechanics 26. In this study, the most frequent parafunctional habit was clenching the teeth, with a frequency of 54%, followed by grinding in 19%. Psychological factors might be closely linked to these findings. Usually TMD patients show increased somatization, stress, depression, and anxiety 27,28. In our series 16% of the patients reported using an antidepressant, and this rate was significantly higher in females. However, the main reason for the use of antidepressants could not be identified with our questionnaire. Further studies should also investigate whether drugs are used to avoid TMD symptoms. Nevertheless, the prevalence of TMD sounds and parafunctions tended to increase with the stress level, especially in females 28. Studies have identified dental status, malocclusions, and missing teeth as factors predisposing to TMD 29,30, although the role of occlusion-related factors is controversial and they are weakly associated with TMD 10. Regression analysis indicated a significant influence of missing teeth on the incidence of TMD. These results need to be verified in a larger population, while considering the number of missing teeth. With its multi-factorial etiology, risk factors for TMD include age, gender, social status, and race. Although epidemiological studies generally concur, there are some contradictory results. One reason for this could be non-standardized examination procedures 10. Despite numerous studies, the mechanism of TMD is not fully understood. Each clinician who is confronted with a patient complaining of symptoms TMD needs to address the entire problem to maximize the potential for a successful outcome. In our series, females were more likely to suffer from TMD. In addition, age-related factors and missing teeth should be considered when evaluating TMD patients. Healthcare systems might make use of this information when implementing policy.

CONCLUSIONS

Females had TMD signs and symptoms more frequently than males in our study population. The most common problem in both genders was pain. Headache, earache, pain in the temporal muscle, and limited mouth opening were the most frequent symptoms, being reported in more than 80% of the TMD patients. Age and missing teeth had a significant effect on the prevalence of TMD.
  30 in total

1.  A prospective investigation over two decades on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and associated variables. A final summary.

Authors:  Tomas Magnusson; Inger Egermarki; Gunnar E Carlsson
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 2.  TMD in relation to malocclusion and orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Bengt Mohlin; Susanna Axelsson; Gunnar Paulin; Terttu Pietilä; Lars Bondemark; Viveca Brattström; Ken Hansen; Anna-Karin Holm
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) axis I diagnoses in an Italian patient population.

Authors:  D Manfredini; G Chiappe; M Bosco
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  The prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in very old subjects.

Authors:  M Schmitter; P Rammelsberg; A Hassel
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 5.  Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  E Tanaka; M S Detamore; L G Mercuri
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Review of temporomandibular joint pathology. Part I: classification, epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Rafael Poveda Roda; José V Bagan; José María Díaz Fernández; Sergio Hernández Bazán; Yolanda Jiménez Soriano
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2007-08-01

Review 7.  A review of temporomandibular joint disease (TMJD). Part II: Clinical and radiological semiology. Morbidity processes.

Authors:  Rafael Poveda Roda; José María Díaz Fernández; Sergio Hernández Bazán; Yolanda Jiménez Soriano; María Margaix; Gracia Sarrión
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2008-02-01

8.  Examination of a large patient population for the presence of symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Barry C Cooper; Israel Kleinberg
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.020

9.  Diagnostic sub-types, psychological distress and psychosocial dysfunction in southern Chinese people with temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  L T K Lee; R W K Yeung; M C M Wong; A S McMillan
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in urban Saudi Arabian adolescents: a research report.

Authors:  Rabab M Feteih
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  34 in total

1.  Central Role of Protein Kinase A in Promoting Trigeminal Nociception in an In Vivo Model of Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Lindsey K Koop; Jordan L Hawkins; Lauren E Cornelison; Paul L Durham
Journal:  J Oral Facial Pain Headache       Date:  2017 Summer

2.  Sleep quality in temporomandibular disorder cases.

Authors:  Ksenija Rener-Sitar; Mike T John; Snigdha S Pusalavidyasagar; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Eric L Schiffman
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  The Relationship between Depression and Anxiety with Temporomandibular Disorder Symptoms in Dental Students.

Authors:  Mahsa Alavi Namvar; Behzad Fathi Afkari; Chamanneh Moslemkhani; Kamyar Mansoori; Mohsen Dadashi
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-12

4.  MRI-based observation of the size and morphology of temporomandibular joint articular disc and condyle in young asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Dan Luo; Cheng Qiu; Ruizhi Zhou; Wenhui Yu; Xitao Li; Jianjun Yang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Evaluating the Efficacy of the Occlusal Splint on the Muscle Activity with the Transducer in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome.

Authors:  Sathyabama Vijayarangan; M Veerabahu; Ajit Chandrasekar; Veeraragavan Narayanan; Nivedhini Priya
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Dietary supplementation with grape seed extract prevents development of trigeminal sensitization and inhibits pain signaling in a preclinical chronic temporomandibular disorder model.

Authors:  Lauren E Cornelison; Neelima Chelliboina; Sara E Woodman; Paul L Durham
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.253

7.  Polysomnographic investigation of sleep and respiratory parameters in women with temporomandibular pain disorders.

Authors:  Boris Dubrovsky; Karen G Raphael; Gilles J Lavigne; Malvin N Janal; David A Sirois; Pia E Wigren; Lena V Nemelivsky; Jack J Klausner; Ana C Krieger
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Outcomes of temporomandibular joint disorders treatment after a survey in the population of Uttarakhand, Part I: An epidemiological study.

Authors:  Ashi Chug; Sagrika Shukla; Sumit Bhatt; Kratika Soni
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-04-25

9.  The Impact of Wearing a Face Mask during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Temporomandibular Joint: A Radiological and Questionnaire Assessment.

Authors:  Moath Zuhour; Majid Ismayilzade; Mehmet Dadacı; Bilsev Ince
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 10.  Association between Stress at Work and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ricardo Luiz de Barreto Aranha; Renata de Castro Martins; Diego Rodrigues de Aguilar; Johana Alejandra Moreno-Drada; Woosung Sohn; Carolina de Castro Martins; Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães de Abreu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.