Elham Rafighi1, Shoba Poduval1, Helena Legido-Quigley1,2, Natasha Howard1. 1. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged 'health tourism,' could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London. METHODS: A qualitative study design was selected. Data were collected through document review and 22 in-depth interviews with non-EEA migrants and civil-society organisation representatives. Data were analysed thematically using the NHS principles. RESULTS: The experiences of those 'vulnerable migrants' (ie, defined as adult non-EEA asylum-seekers, refugees, undocumented, low-skilled, and trafficked migrants susceptible to marginalised healthcare access) able to access health services were positive, with healthcare professionals generally demonstrating caring attitudes. However, general confusion existed about entitlements due to recent NHS changes, controversy over 'health tourism,' and challenges registering for health services or accessing secondary facilities. Factors requiring greater clarity or improvement included accessibility, communication, and clarity on general practitioner (GP) responsibilities and migrant entitlements. CONCLUSION: Legislation to restrict access to healthcare based on immigration status could further compromise the health of vulnerable individuals in Britain. This study highlights current challenges in health services policy and practice and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in healthcare advocacy (eg, helping the voices of the most vulnerable reach policy-makers). Thus, it contributes to broadening national discussions and enabling more nuanced interpretation of ongoing global debates on immigration and health.
BACKGROUND: Recent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged 'health tourism,' could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London. METHODS: A qualitative study design was selected. Data were collected through document review and 22 in-depth interviews with non-EEA migrants and civil-society organisation representatives. Data were analysed thematically using the NHS principles. RESULTS: The experiences of those 'vulnerable migrants' (ie, defined as adult non-EEA asylum-seekers, refugees, undocumented, low-skilled, and trafficked migrants susceptible to marginalised healthcare access) able to access health services were positive, with healthcare professionals generally demonstrating caring attitudes. However, general confusion existed about entitlements due to recent NHS changes, controversy over 'health tourism,' and challenges registering for health services or accessing secondary facilities. Factors requiring greater clarity or improvement included accessibility, communication, and clarity on general practitioner (GP) responsibilities and migrant entitlements. CONCLUSION: Legislation to restrict access to healthcare based on immigration status could further compromise the health of vulnerable individuals in Britain. This study highlights current challenges in health services policy and practice and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in healthcare advocacy (eg, helping the voices of the most vulnerable reach policy-makers). Thus, it contributes to broadening national discussions and enabling more nuanced interpretation of ongoing global debates on immigration and health.
Authors: Helena Legido-Quigley; Elena Urdaneta; Alvaro Gonzalez; Daniel La Parra; Carles Muntaner; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet; Jose M Martin-Moreno; Martin McKee Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shoba Poduval; Natasha Howard; Lucy Jones; Phil Murwill; Martin McKee; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: Int J Health Serv Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Laura B Nellums; Jaynaide Powis; Lucy Jones; Anna Miller; Kieran Rustage; Neal Russell; Jon S Friedland; Sally Hargreaves Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Catherine L Saunders; Adam Steventon; Barbara Janta; Mai Stafford; Carol Sinnott; Lucinda Allen; Sarah R Deeny Journal: J Health Serv Res Policy Date: 2020-03-19