Literature DB >> 27693900

Pain Assessment, Management, and Control Among Patients 65 Years or Older Receiving Hospice Care in the U.S.

Meagan E Cea1, M Cary Reid2, Charles Inturrisi3, Lisa R Witkin4, Holly G Prigerson2, Yuhua Bao5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Knowledge is limited regarding pain assessment and management practices, as well as pain-related outcomes in hospice care.
OBJECTIVES: To generate national estimates of pain assessment and management practices and outcomes of pain control among patients 65 years or older receiving hospice care in the U.S. and identify hospice discharge and agency characteristics predicting study outcomes.
METHODS: The 2007 National Home Health and Hospice Care Survey was analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated to identify discharge and agency characteristics predicting guideline-concordant pain assessment and management practices and pain control outcomes.
RESULTS: A high percentage of discharges had pain assessment at admission (97%) and before discharge (93%); use of valid pain rating scales was relatively low (69% and 54% for first and last assessments, respectively). Almost 95% of patients received pain medication, but only 42% received nonpharmacologic therapies. About 70% of patients assessed with a valid pain scale saw improvement in the level of pain or remained free of pain from admission to discharge. Non-Hispanic blacks were less likely to have pain assessments, and Hispanics were less likely to receive opioid analgesics or to have pain-free status at discharge, compared with non-Hispanic whites. Patients receiving care from for-profit (vs. nonprofit) agencies were more likely to receive pain assessment with a valid scale before discharge but less likely to experience pain control or improvement.
CONCLUSION: Greater use of valid pain assessment scales and nonpharmacologic therapies constitutes areas for improvement in hospice care. Targeted interventions are needed to address disparities in pain care by patient race and/or ethnicity and agency ownership status.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospice; pain assessment; pain control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693900      PMCID: PMC5473027          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  35 in total

1.  What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Catherine J Evans
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  For-profit medicare home health agencies' costs appear higher and quality appears lower compared to nonprofit agencies.

Authors:  William Cabin; David U Himmelstein; Michael L Siman; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Evaluation of the Revised Faces Pain Scale, Verbal Descriptor Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Iowa Pain Thermometer in older minority adults.

Authors:  Laurie Jowers Ware; Cynthia D Epps; Keela Herr; Abbot Packard
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 4.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

Authors:  Amelia Williamson; Barbara Hoggart
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Keela Herr; Patrick J Coyne; Margo McCaffery; Renee Manworren; Sandra Merkel
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life?

Authors:  Susan C Miller; Vincent Mor; Ning Wu; Pedro Gozalo; Kate Lapane
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Cash and compassion: profit status and the delivery of hospice services.

Authors:  Karl A Lorenz; Susan L Ettner; Kenneth E Rosenfeld; David M Carlisle; Barbara Leake; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  A comparison of five pain assessment scales for nursing home residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment.

Authors:  S José Closs; Bridget Barr; Michelle Briggs; Keith Cash; Kate Seers
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Katherine R Jones; Carol P Vojir; Evelyn Hutt; Regina Fink
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2007

10.  Comparison of patients' ratings and examination of nurses' responses to pain intensity rating scales.

Authors:  J S Carpenter; D Brockopp
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences of Quality in End-of-Life Care across Settings: Results from the U.S. National Health and Aging Trends Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shuo Xu; Mangdong Liu; Oejin Shin; Vanessa Parker; Rosalba Hernandez
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 2.  Does ethnicity affect pain management for people with advanced disease? A mixed methods cross-national systematic review of 'very high' Human Development Index English-speaking countries.

Authors:  Gemma Clarke; Emma Chapman; Jodie Crooks; Jonathan Koffman; Shenaz Ahmed; Michael I Bennett
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Healthcare Received in the Last Months of Life in Portugal: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Pereira; Amélia Ferreira; José Martins
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.