Literature DB >> 27693264

Surgical Outcomes of Erectile Implants After Phalloplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 95 Procedures.

Paul Neuville1, Nicolas Morel-Journel1, Delphine Maucourt-Boulch2, Alain Ruffion1, Philippe Paparel1, Jean-Etienne Terrier3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The creation of a neophallus is a complex surgery that must meet functional and esthetic requirements. It is a long and demanding surgical process whose final stage consists of the implantation of a rigid or inflatable material that can be used to reproduce an erection. Data in the literature are scarce, with only the pioneering series present, which includes the use of the first devices and techniques. AIM: To report the outcome of patients with phalloplasty after implantation of erectile implants using standardized surgical techniques and the use of recent prosthesis types with or without a vascular graft.
METHODS: This is a retrospective hospital-based analysis of all patients with phalloplasty who underwent implantation of an erectile prosthesis from March 2007 to May 2015. Factors associated with complications were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early-onset (during the first month after surgery) and late-onset complications, including erosion, infections, malpositioning, and dysfunction.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included in the study and 95 procedures were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 4 years (minimum = 169 days, maximum = 6.1 years), the original prosthesis was still in place in 43 patients (62.3%). Patients underwent phalloplasty after female-to-male transsexualism (n = 62, 89.9%), malformation (n = 4, 5.8%), or trauma (n = 3, 4.3%). The proportions for the different types of phalloplasty were 58% for forearm free flap phalloplasty (n = 40), 33.3% for suprapubic phalloplasty (n = 23), and 7% for other (n = 6). The erectile prostheses used were the two-piece AMS Ambicor (n = 71, 74.7%), the Ambicor with a vascular graft (n = 19, 20.0%), and the AMS 700CXR, AMS 700CX, or AMS600-650 (n = 5, 5.2%). There were no early-onset complications in 89 procedures (93.7%) and, when present, they were always related to infection (n = 4, 4.2%). Late-onset complications were erosion (n = 4, 4.2%), infection (n = 4, 4.2%), dysfunction (n = 10, 10.5%), and malpositioning (n = 12, 12.6%). No significant difference was observed for malpositioning (12.7% vs 10.5%, P = .87) and dysfunction (7.0% vs 10.5%, P = .78) between the AMS Ambicor prosthesis and the Ambicor prosthesis with a vascular graft.
CONCLUSION: This study provides updated data on complications after the implantation of erectile implants. Multicenter studies, including the evaluation of patient satisfaction, are needed to increase our understanding of factors associated with the outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Device; Female-to-Male Transsexualism; Neophallus; Penile Prosthesis; Phalloplasty; Transsexualism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693264     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  10 in total

Review 1.  An overview of female-to-male gender-confirming surgery.

Authors:  Shane D Morrison; Mang L Chen; Curtis N Crane
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Gender confirming surgery : Female-to-male and male-to-female].

Authors:  M Sohn; U M Rieger; J Heß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy.

Authors:  George Coba; Trushar Patel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Reconstructive surgery in penile cancer].

Authors:  M Sohn; M Dietrich; A Wirthmann; U M Rieger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Functional and surgical outcomes after phalloplasty in cis men.

Authors:  Agate Escoffier; Nicolas Morel-Journel; Manon Terrier; Léna Paganelli; Fabien Boucher; Alain Ruffion; Damien Carnicelli; Paul Neuville
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  Review of penile reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Sverrir Kristinsson; Mark Johnson; David Ralph
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  Reconstructive Management Pearls for the Transgender Patient.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Jeff Sun; Michael A Granieri; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Military genitourinary injuries: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Felicia L Balzano; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

Review 9.  Penile Prosthesis in Transgender Men after Phalloplasty.

Authors:  Rajveer S Purohit; Marissa Kent; Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 10.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.