Nwamaka D Eneanya1, Susan M Hailpern2, Ann M O'Hare3, Manjula Kurella Tamura4, Ronit Katz2, William Kreuter2, Maria E Montez-Rath5, Paul L Hebert6, Yoshio N Hall2. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: aeneanya@partners.org. 2. Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 3. Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA. 4. Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center, Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA. 5. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA. 6. Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many dialysis patients receive intensive procedures intended to prolong life at the very end of life. However, little is known about trends over time in the use of these procedures. We describe temporal trends in receipt of inpatient intensive procedures during the last 6 months of life among patients treated with maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Mortality follow-back study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 649,607 adult Medicare beneficiaries on maintenance dialysis therapy who died in 2000 to 2012. PREDICTORS: Period of death (2000-2003, 2004-2008, or 2009-2012), age at time of death (18-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, and ≥85 years), and race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, or non-Hispanic white). OUTCOME: Receipt of an inpatient intensive procedure (defined as invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy/jejunostomy tube insertion, enteral or parenteral nutrition, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) during the last 6 months of life. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of cohort patients received an intensive procedure in the last 6 months of life, increasing from 29% in 2000 to 36% in 2012 (with 2000-2003 as the referent category; adjusted risk ratios [RRs] were 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] and 1.10 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] for 2004-2008 and 2009-2012, respectively). Use of intensive procedures increased more markedly over time in younger versus older patients (comparing 2009-2012 to 2000-2003, adjusted RR was 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.20] for the youngest age group as opposed to 1.00 [95% CI, 0.96-1.04] for the oldest group). Comparing 2009 to 2012 to 2000 to 2003, the use of intensive procedures increased more dramatically for Hispanic patients than for non-Hispanic black or non-Hispanic white patients (adjusted RRs of 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14-1.22], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.11], and 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.12], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Data sources do not provide insight into reasons for observed trends in the use of intensive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with maintenance dialysis, there is a trend toward more frequent use of intensive procedures at the end of life, especially in younger patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity.
BACKGROUND: Many dialysis patients receive intensive procedures intended to prolong life at the very end of life. However, little is known about trends over time in the use of these procedures. We describe temporal trends in receipt of inpatient intensive procedures during the last 6 months of life among patients treated with maintenance dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Mortality follow-back study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 649,607 adult Medicare beneficiaries on maintenance dialysis therapy who died in 2000 to 2012. PREDICTORS: Period of death (2000-2003, 2004-2008, or 2009-2012), age at time of death (18-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, and ≥85 years), and race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, or non-Hispanic white). OUTCOME: Receipt of an inpatient intensive procedure (defined as invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy/jejunostomy tube insertion, enteral or parenteral nutrition, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) during the last 6 months of life. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of cohort patients received an intensive procedure in the last 6 months of life, increasing from 29% in 2000 to 36% in 2012 (with 2000-2003 as the referent category; adjusted risk ratios [RRs] were 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] and 1.10 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] for 2004-2008 and 2009-2012, respectively). Use of intensive procedures increased more markedly over time in younger versus older patients (comparing 2009-2012 to 2000-2003, adjusted RR was 1.18 [95% CI, 1.15-1.20] for the youngest age group as opposed to 1.00 [95% CI, 0.96-1.04] for the oldest group). Comparing 2009 to 2012 to 2000 to 2003, the use of intensive procedures increased more dramatically for Hispanic patients than for non-Hispanic black or non-Hispanic white patients (adjusted RRs of 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14-1.22], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.07-1.11], and 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.12], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Data sources do not provide insight into reasons for observed trends in the use of intensive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with maintenance dialysis, there is a trend toward more frequent use of intensive procedures at the end of life, especially in younger patients and those of Hispanic ethnicity.
Authors: Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kathleen T Unroe; Melissa A Greiner; Adrian F Hernandez; David J Whellan; Padma Kaul; Kevin A Schulman; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-10-11
Authors: Tim Luckett; Marcus Sellars; Jennifer Tieman; Carol A Pollock; William Silvester; Phyllis N Butow; Karen M Detering; Frank Brennan; Josephine M Clayton Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Bernadette A Thomas; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Edward J Boyko; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Anne M Murray; Cheryl Arko; Shu-Cheng Chen; David T Gilbertson; Alvin H Moss Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Jonathan Wong; Beibei Xu; Heidi N Yeung; Eric J Roeland; Maria Elena Martinez; Quynh-Thu Le; Loren K Mell; James D Murphy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kabir O Olaniran; Shananssa G Percy; Sophia Zhao; Chantal Blais; Vicki Jackson; Mihir M Kamdar; Jeremy Goverman; Daniela Kroshinsky; Jennifer S Temel; Sagar U Nigwekar; Nwamaka D Eneanya Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Manjula Kurella Tamura; Ann M O'Hare; Eugene Lin; Laura M Holdsworth; Elizabeth Malcolm; Alvin H Moss Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sarah J Ramer; Nicolas A Baddour; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Aihua Bian; Thomas G Stewart; Susan P Y Wong; Manisha Jhamb; Khaled Abdel-Kader Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Lauren T Starr; Connie M Ulrich; Paul Junker; Scott M Appel; Nina R O'Connor; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Joy Chieh-Yu Chen; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Lisa E Vaughan; Molly A Feely; Robert C Albright; Macaulay Onuigbo; Suzanne M Norby; Christy L Gossett; Margaret M D'Uscio; Amy W Williams; John J Dillon; LaTonya J Hickson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lilia Cervantes; Michel Chonchol; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; John F Steiner; Edward Havranek; Madelyne Hull; John Rice; Jessica Kendrick; Xochilt Alamillo; Claudia Camacho; Stacy Fischer Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.947