Literature DB >> 27693087

Cognitive Phenotypes and the Evolution of Animal Decisions.

Tamra C Mendelson1, Courtney L Fitzpatrick2, Mark E Hauber3, Charles H Pence4, Rafael L Rodríguez5, Rebecca J Safran6, Caitlin A Stern7, Jeffrey R Stevens8.   

Abstract

Despite the clear fitness consequences of animal decisions, the science of animal decision making in evolutionary biology is underdeveloped compared with decision science in human psychology. Specifically, the field lacks a conceptual framework that defines and describes the relevant components of a decision, leading to imprecise language and concepts. The 'judgment and decision-making' (JDM) framework in human psychology is a powerful tool for framing and understanding human decisions, and we apply it here to components of animal decisions, which we refer to as 'cognitive phenotypes'. We distinguish multiple cognitive phenotypes in the context of a JDM framework and highlight empirical approaches to characterize them as evolvable traits.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice; cognitive phenotype; discrimination; judgment and decision making; preference; recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693087     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  8 in total

1.  Processing bias: extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing.

Authors:  Julien P Renoult; Tamra C Mendelson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A test of the nest sanitation hypothesis for the evolution of foreign egg rejection in an avian brood parasite rejecter host species.

Authors:  Alec B Luro; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  The relationship between a combinatorial processing rule and a continuous mate preference function in an insect.

Authors:  Camille Desjonquères; Rebecca R Holt; Bretta Speck; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.

Authors:  Shiva Farashahi; Habiba Azab; Benjamin Hayden; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Complex signals alter recognition accuracy and conspecific acceptance thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Ming Liu; Emily C Laub; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Multi-Level Effects Driving Cognitive and Behavioral Variability among Prairie Voles: Insights into Reproductive Decision-Making from Biological Levels of Organization.

Authors:  Santiago A Forero; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.919

8.  Shared transcriptional responses to con- and heterospecific behavioral antagonists in a wild songbird.

Authors:  Matthew I M Louder; Michael Lafayette; Amber A Louder; Floria M K Uy; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Ken Yasukawa; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.