Literature DB >> 27692852

Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.

Noah D Goodman1, Michael C Frank2.   

Abstract

Understanding language requires more than the use of fixed conventions and more than decoding combinatorial structure. Instead, comprehenders make exquisitely sensitive inferences about what utterances mean given their knowledge of the speaker, language, and context. Building on developments in game theory and probabilistic modeling, we describe the rational speech act (RSA) framework for pragmatic reasoning. RSA models provide a principled way to formalize inferences about meaning in context; they have been used to make successful quantitative predictions about human behavior in a variety of different tasks and situations, and they explain why complex phenomena, such as hyperbole and vagueness, occur. More generally, they provide a computational framework for integrating linguistic structure, world knowledge, and context in pragmatic language understanding.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692852     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  24 in total

1.  Young children consider the expected utility of others' learning to decide what to teach.

Authors:  Sophie Bridgers; Julian Jara-Ettinger; Hyowon Gweon
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-10-14

2.  Feature Uncertainty Predicts Behavioral and Neural Responses to Combined Concepts.

Authors:  Sarah H Solomon; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Hossam Zeitoun; Tigran Melkonyan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 8.247

4.  Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.

Authors:  Anna Coenen; Jonathan D Nelson; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

6.  Reading between the lines: Listener's vmPFC simulates speaker cooperative choices in communication games.

Authors:  Qingtian Mi; Cong Wang; Colin F Camerer; Lusha Zhu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Applying Probabilistic Programming to Affective Computing.

Authors:  Desmond C Ong; Harold Soh; Jamil Zaki; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 10.506

8.  Warm (for Winter): Inferring Comparison Classes in Communication.

Authors:  Michael Henry Tessler; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-03

Review 9.  Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis.

Authors:  George A Mashour; Pieter Roelfsema; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation.

Authors:  Justin Sulik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.