Literature DB >> 27692497

Can dressings soaked with polyhexanide reduce bacterial loads in full-thickness skin grafting? A randomized controlled trial.

Karim Saleh1, Andreas Sonesson2, Kerstin Persson2, Kristian Riesbeck3, Artur Schmidtchen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB)-based antiseptic solutions can reduce bacterial loads in different clinical settings and are believed to lower risk of infections.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of a PHMB-based solution in lowering bacterial loads of full-thickness skin grafting wounds and the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs).
METHODS: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 40 patients planned for facial full-thickness skin grafting were randomized 1:1 to receive tie-over dressings soaked with either PHMB-based solution or sterile water. Quantitative and qualitative bacterial analysis was performed on all wounds before surgery, at the end of surgery, and 7 days postoperatively. In addition, all patients were screened for nasal colonization of Staphylococcus aureus.
RESULTS: Analysis of wounds showed no statistically significant difference in bacterial reductions between the groups. The SSI rates were significantly higher in the intervention group (8/20) than in the control group (2/20) (P = .028). Higher postoperative bacterial loads were a common finding in SSIs (P = .011). This was more frequent when S aureus was present postoperatively (P = .034), intraoperatively (P = .03), and in patients with intranasal S aureus colonization (P = .007). LIMITATIONS: Assessment of SSIs is largely subjective. In addition, this was a single-center study and the total number of participants was 40.
CONCLUSION: Soaking tie-over dressings with PHMB solution in full-thickness skin grafting had no effect on postoperative bacterial loads and increased the risk of SSI development. The presence of S aureus intranasally and in wounds preoperatively and postoperatively increased postoperative bacterial loads, which in turn resulted in significantly more SSIs.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; bacteria; dermatologic surgery; pathogenesis; prevention; surgical site infections; wound infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692497     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  4 in total

Review 1.  Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.

Authors:  Yu-Xuan Ma; Chen-Yu Wang; Yuan-Yuan Li; Jing Li; Qian-Qian Wan; Ji-Hua Chen; Franklin R Tay; Li-Na Niu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Biofilm reduction potential of 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution in several types of urethral catheters.

Authors:  Florian H H Brill; Julia Hambach; Christian Utpatel; Diana C Mogrovejo; Henrik Gabriel; Jan-Hendrik Klock; Joerg Steinmann; Andreas Arndt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Efficacy of Conventional and Liposomal Povidone-Iodine in Infected Mesh Skin Grafts: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Peter M Vogt; Joerg Hauser; Stefan Mueller; Bjoern Bosse; Michael Hopp
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus and the risk of surgical site infection after surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Tang; Jiangjin Hui; Jing Ma; Chen Mingquan
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.944

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.