| Literature DB >> 27692480 |
Alison L Greggor1, Oded Berger-Tal2, Daniel T Blumstein3, Lisa Angeloni4, Carmen Bessa-Gomes5, Bradley F Blackwell6, Colleen Cassady St Clair7, Kevin Crooks8, Shermin de Silva9, Esteban Fernández-Juricic10, Shifra Z Goldenberg11, Sarah L Mesnick12, Megan Owen13, Catherine J Price14, David Saltz2, Christopher J Schell15, Andrew V Suarez16, Ronald R Swaisgood13, Clark S Winchell17, William J Sutherland18.
Abstract
Poor communication between academic researchers and wildlife managers limits conservation progress and innovation. As a result, input from overlapping fields, such as animal behaviour, is underused in conservation management despite its demonstrated utility as a conservation tool and countless papers advocating its use. Communication and collaboration across these two disciplines are unlikely to improve without clearly identified management needs and demonstrable impacts of behavioural-based conservation management. To facilitate this process, a team of wildlife managers and animal behaviour researchers conducted a research prioritisation exercise, identifying 50 key questions that have great potential to resolve critical conservation and management problems. The resulting agenda highlights the diversity and extent of advances that both fields could achieve through collaboration.Keywords: Delphi method; animal behaviour; conservation biology; horizon scan; policy priorities; wildlife management
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27692480 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712