Literature DB >> 18262129

Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.

Stephen Jones1, Matthew Williams.   

Abstract

Direct Machine Parameter Optimization (DMPO) is a leaf segmentation program released as an optional item of the Pinnacle planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA); it is based on the principles of direct aperture optimization where the size, shape, and weight of individual segments are optimized to produce an intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) plan. In this study, we compare DMPO to the traditional method of IMRT planning, in which intensity maps are optimized prior to conversion into deliverable multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures, and we determine if there was any dosimetric improvement, treatment efficiency gain, or planning advantage provided by the use of DMPO. Eleven head-and-neck patients treated with IMRT had treatment plans generated using each optimization method. For each patient, the same planning parameters were used for each optimization method. All calculations were performed using Pinnacle version 7.6c software and treatments were delivered using a step-and-shoot IMRT method on a Varian 2100EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Each plan was assessed based on the calculation time, a conformity index, the composite objective value used in the optimization, the number of segments, monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. The results showed DMPO to be superior to the traditional optimization method in all areas. Considerable advantages were observed in the dosimetric quality of DMPO plans, which also required 32% less time to calculate, 42% fewer MUs, and 35% fewer segments than the conventional optimization method. These reductions translated directly into a 29% decrease in treatment times. While considerable gains were observed in planning and treatment efficiency, they were specific to our institution, and the impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and workflow will be dependent on the planning parameters, planning system, and linear accelerators used by a particular institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18262129     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  12 in total

1.  Improving target dose coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of advanced laryngeal cancer by a simple optimization technique.

Authors:  J-Y Lu; L-L Wu; J-Y Zhang; J Zheng; M L-M Cheung; C-C Ma; L-X Xie; B-T Huang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  An empirical method for automatic determination of maximum number of segments in DMPO-based IMRT for Head and Neck cases.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; K Joseph Maria Das
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  The impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and efficiency in complex head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Marcello Sabatino; Matthias Kretschmer; Klemens Zink; Florian Würschmidt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Dosimetric Evaluation of a Simple Planning Technique for Improving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Mei Li; Bao-Tian Huang; Wen-Jia Xie; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture-based IMRT optimization.

Authors:  Peng Qi; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy plans.

Authors:  Maria Broderick; Michelle Leech; Mary Coffey
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Improving target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical oesophageal cancer using a simple optimisation method.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Bao-Tian Huang; Li-Li Wu; Wen-Jia Xie; Zhi-Jian Chen; De-Rui Li; Liang-Xi Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A simple optimization approach for improving target dose homogeneity in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Ji-Yong Zhang; Mei Li; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Yang-Kang Li; Jing Zheng; Bao-Tian Huang; Wu-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Dosimetric evaluation of a simple planning method for improving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage III lung cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Zhu Lin; Jing Zheng; Pei-Xian Lin; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Bao-Tian Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.