Literature DB >> 27690741

Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis.

Eric L Simpson1, Thomas Bieber1, Emma Guttman-Yassky1, Lisa A Beck1, Andrew Blauvelt1, Michael J Cork1, Jonathan I Silverberg1, Mette Deleuran1, Yoko Kataoka1, Jean-Philippe Lacour1, Külli Kingo1, Margitta Worm1, Yves Poulin1, Andreas Wollenberg1, Yuhwen Soo1, Neil M H Graham1, Gianluca Pirozzi1, Bolanle Akinlade1, Heribert Staudinger1, Vera Mastey1, Laurent Eckert1, Abhijit Gadkari1, Neil Stahl1, George D Yancopoulos1, Marius Ardeleanu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-4 receptor alpha, inhibits signaling of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, type 2 cytokines that may be important drivers of atopic or allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis.
METHODS: In two randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of identical design (SOLO 1 and SOLO 2), we enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis whose disease was inadequately controlled by topical treatment. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive, for 16 weeks, subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo weekly or the same dose of dupilumab every other week alternating with placebo. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had both a score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) on the Investigator's Global Assessment and a reduction of 2 points or more in that score from baseline at week 16.
RESULTS: We enrolled 671 patients in SOLO 1 and 708 in SOLO 2. In SOLO 1, the primary outcome occurred in 85 patients (38%) who received dupilumab every other week and in 83 (37%) who received dupilumab weekly, as compared with 23 (10%) who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). The results were similar in SOLO 2, with the primary outcome occurring in 84 patients (36%) who received dupilumab every other week and in 87 (36%) who received dupilumab weekly, as compared with 20 (8%) who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons). In addition, in the two trials, an improvement from baseline to week 16 of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index was reported in significantly more patients who received each regimen of dupilumab than in patients who received placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Dupilumab was also associated with improvement in other clinical end points, including reduction in pruritus and symptoms of anxiety or depression and improvement in quality of life. Injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis were more frequent in the dupilumab groups than in the placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In two phase 3 trials of identical design involving patients with atopic dermatitis, dupilumab improved the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, including pruritus, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and quality of life, as compared with placebo. Trials of longer duration are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; SOLO 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02277743 ; SOLO 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02277769 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27690741     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  306 in total

Review 1.  Negative Regulation of Type 2 Immunity.

Authors:  Dimitri A de Kouchkovsky; Sourav Ghosh; Carla V Rothlin
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 16.687

2.  Kappa-on-Heavy (KoH) bodies are a distinct class of fully-human antibody-like therapeutic agents with antigen-binding properties.

Authors:  Lynn E Macdonald; Karoline A Meagher; Matthew C Franklin; Natasha Levenkova; Johanna Hansen; Ashok T Badithe; Maggie Zhong; Pamela Krueger; Ashique Rafique; Naxin Tu; James Shevchuk; Saurabh Wadhwa; George Ehrlich; Joannie Bautista; Craig Grant; Lakeisha Esau; William T Poueymirou; Wojtek Auerbach; Lori Morton; Robert Babb; Gang Chen; Tammy Huang; Douglas MacDonald; Kenneth Graham; Cagan Gurer; Vera A Voronina; John R McWhirter; Chunguang Guo; George D Yancopoulos; Andrew J Murphy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  First eczema biologic debuts but price could restrict use.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  "Inflammatory skin march" in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Authors:  Masutaka Furue; Takafumi Kadono
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 5.  The use of biologics for immune modulation in allergic disease.

Authors:  Willem van de Veen; Mübeccel Akdis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Exploring changes in placebo treatment arms in hidradenitis suppurativa randomized clinical trials: A systematic review.

Authors:  Asma Amir Ali; Elizabeth K Seng; Afsaneh Alavi; Michelle A Lowes
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 7.  Profiling Immune Expression to Consider Repurposing Therapeutics for the Ichthyoses.

Authors:  Amy S Paller
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 8.  T-cell positioning by chemokines in autoimmune skin diseases.

Authors:  Jillian M Richmond; James P Strassner; Kingsley I Essien; John E Harris
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 9.  TH9 cells in skin disorders.

Authors:  Rachael A Clark; Christoph Schlapbach
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 10.  Biological Therapies for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Emily Ko; Mirna Chehade
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.