Literature DB >> 27690092

Food and Nutrient Intake among 12-Month-Old Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi Infants.

Navnit Kaur Grewal1, Lene Frost Andersen2, Cathrine Solheim Kolve3, Ingrid Kverndalen4, Liv Elin Torheim5.   

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to describe food and nutrient intake among 12-month-old Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants, with a focus on iron and vitamin D intake. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August 2013 through September 2014. Eighty-nine mothers/infants of Somali origin and 77 mothers/infants of Iraqi origin residing in Eastern Norway participated in the study. Data were collected using two 24-h multiple-pass recalls. Forty percent of the Norwegian-Somali infants and 47% of the Norwegian-Iraqi infants were breastfed at 12 months of age (p = 0.414). Median energy percentages (E%) from protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the recommended intake ranges, except the level of saturated fats (12-13 E%). Median intakes of almost all micronutrients were above the recommended daily intakes. Most of the infants consumed iron-enriched products (81%) and received vitamin D supplements (84%). The median intakes of iron and vitamin D were significantly higher among infants receiving iron-enriched products and vitamin D supplements compared to infants not receiving such products (p < 0.001). The findings indicate that the food and nutrient intake of this group of infants in general seems to be in accordance with Norwegian dietary recommendations. Foods rich in iron and vitamin D supplements were important sources of the infants' intake of iron and vitamin D and should continue to be promoted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Norway; food; immigrants; infants; nutrient intake

Year:  2016        PMID: 27690092      PMCID: PMC5083990          DOI: 10.3390/nu8100602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


1. Introduction

The first two years of a child’s life are particularly important as this is a period of rapid growth when nutritional needs are high [1,2]. Knowledge about infants’ and toddlers’ food and nutrient intake is therefore important to evaluate their diet and identify potential challenges. In Norway, national dietary surveys of infants and toddlers have been performed at the ages of 6, 12 and 24 months [3,4,5]. Due to methodological issues, infants and toddlers of immigrant mothers were excluded from these surveys, and separate surveys for these children have been called for by the Norwegian Directorate of Health [6]. Consequently, compared to infants of Norwegian-born parents, less is known about the food and nutrient intake of infants of immigrant parents in Norway. However, some previous smaller studies of Norwegian immigrant children have shown some potential nutrition challenges, such as high prevalence of iron and vitamin D deficiencies and a relatively high added sugar intake [7,8,9]. It has further been suggested that immigrant children may be introduced to cow’s milk at a younger age than ethnic Norwegian children, although inconsistent trends have been observed [9]. As cow’s milk contains very little iron, consumption >500 mL/day has been associated with reduced iron stores in young children [10,11]. However, intake of fortified foods seems to improve iron status in late infancy [12]. To address the paucity of data on food and nutrient intake and infant feeding practices among Norwegian children with immigrant backgrounds, the InnBaKost study was initiated in 2012. Information on breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices among 6-month-old Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants was recently published [13]. The present paper aimed to describe and compare food and nutrient intake among 12-month-old Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants, with a focus on iron and vitamin D intake.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Design

A cross-sectional survey was carried out from August 2013−September 2014. Mothers born in Somalia or Iraq and living in Oslo, Akershus or Buskerud were eligible for inclusion. These two immigrant groups were chosen, as they are the two non-Western immigrant groups in Norway with the highest number of births per year [14]. Children on a special diet due to serious illness were excluded. If the mother had twins or triplets, only one child was included by random selection. Mothers who participated in the InnBaKost survey of 6-month-old infants [13] were contacted again when their children turned 12 months old. These mothers had not received any information about the results in the 6-months survey or dietary counselling which could influence dietary habits at the infants’ 12 months of age. In the 6-month survey, 107 Norwegian-Somali mothers and infants and 80 Norwegian-Iraqi mothers and infants participated [13]. Of these, 70 Norwegian-Somali infants and 61 Norwegian-Iraqi infants participated in the 12-month follow-up survey. Seven of the Somali-born mothers and eight of the Iraqi-born mothers declined to participate further, while 30 Somali-born mothers and 11 Iraqi-born mothers could not be reached. Along with the mothers/infants participating in the 6-month survey, 19 additional Somali-born mothers and 16 additional Iraqi-born mothers were recruited. The additional mothers were recruited through lists obtained from the National Population Register. Mothers who were not reached from these lists in the 6-month survey were approached again when the infants were 12 months. A total sample of 89 Norwegian-Somali infants and 77 Norwegian-Iraqi infants were included for the present analysis. To collect data on the food intake of the 12-month-old infants, two 24-h multiple-pass recalls were conducted face-to-face as closely as possible to the child’s 12-month birthday. Eight trained female fieldworkers speaking the relevant language performed the interviews in Somali, Arabic, Kurdish or Norwegian. A total of 8% (n = 13) only completed one single 24-h recall. For mothers who were unable to meet in person, the interview was conducted over the telephone. Of all the participants, 3% (n = 5) had both interviews conducted over the telephone, while 4% (n = 7) had one of the two interviews conducted over the telephone. The interviews were conducted at a time and place chosen by individual mothers. The average time between the two 24-h recalls was 2 weeks. For 7% of the participants, there were more than 4 weeks between the two interviews. Approximately 78% of all the dietary recalls were collected for intakes on weekdays and 22% were collected for intakes on weekends among Norwegian-Somali infants, and the numbers were 83% and 17%, respectively, for Norwegian-Iraqi infants. In both groups, over 85% of the recall days were reported as representative of the usual daily dietary intake of the child. Each mother who completed the two 24-h recalls received a voucher for a baby shop worth approximately US $25. The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2012/957) approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all the participating mothers.

2.2. 24-h Multiple-Pass Recall Method

The 24-h multiple-pass recall method was used to collect data on the 12-month-old Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants. The method was first developed and pilot tested on 12 Somali-born and Iraqi-born mothers from January to June 2013 [15]. Briefly, in this dietary recall method, the mothers were to be interviewed twice about the exact food and beverage intake of their children during the preceding 24 h. A 24-h period was defined as from the time the child woke up the previous day until the time the child woke up the day of the interview. The dietary recall was divided into three passes. In the first pass, the mothers were asked to report everything that their children had consumed the previous day, including during the night. Each breastfeeding occurrence was also to be reported. In the second pass, mothers were asked to provide additional detailed information about each item of food and drink consumed by the children. This included type of product, brand names, cooking methods, amounts and leftovers. For homemade dishes, the mothers were asked for the recipes, and the list of ingredients was recorded. The third pass was a review of the recall, and the mothers were given the opportunity to provide any additional information regarding the children’s food and drink consumption. During the last pass, the field workers were also instructed to prompt for information about foods and drinks not mentioned that were considered to be easy to forget, such as snacks, fruits, water, juices and supplements, which the field workers read from a list. Two photographic booklets previously used in Norwegian national dietary surveys, were utilized during the interviews as an aid to estimate portion sizes. The Spedkost booklet [4] containing 17 colour photograph series of infant portion sizes of selected foods and drinks was mostly employed. The Norkost booklet [16] containing a series of adult portion sizes was mainly used to estimate portion sizes of different kinds of bread. A picture library containing 405 pictures divided into 19 folders on an iPad was used to help identify the types of foods/drinks/products given to the children. The development of the picture library has been described in more detail elsewhere [15].

2.3. Questionnaire and Background Characteristics

A questionnaire with 19 questions on five topics was used to collect additional information about the infants. The questions related to breastfeeding (whether the infant was breastfed, and if so, the frequency of breastfeeding), the age of introduction to various foods and drinks, whether the infant had any allergies/intolerances, the use of dietary supplements and arenas for receiving infant nutrition information. In Norway, healthcare personnel routinely measure the length and weight of children during regular check-ups at children’s health clinics, including at 12 months of age. Participating mothers were asked to bring their infant’s health cards to the interview in order to record these data. Other background characteristics, such as infants’ gender, mothers’ age, mothers’ age when they immigrated to Norway, number of children, parental education levels and fathers’ origins, were already provided from the 6-month survey. The same questions were asked of newly recruited mothers. All mothers were also asked to provide information on current work status and person/place in charge of day-care for the infants. When possible, other persons in charge of the day-care of the infant during the recall days were consulted on the infants’ dietary intake during those hours.

2.4. Food Intake and Nutrient Calculations

Information from the 24-h recalls was manually coded by nutritionists. All foods and beverages consumed by each child were converted into grams of edible portions. For recipes, a modified version of the summing method was applied to calculate the intake of each ingredient [17]. A breast milk intake of 124 mL per feed or an intake of 497 mL for children whose mothers reported to have breastfed their children four times or more was used, as described by Grewal et al. [15]. The daily nutrient intakes (averaged over the two days) were computed using a food database and a dietary calculation system (KBS, version 7.2, database AE-10) developed at the Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. The food database used is mainly based on the official Norwegian food composition table but is also continuously supplemented with data on new food items and nutrient content. Relevant food products missing from KBS were added, and the nutrient content was based on the nutrient content listed on the products’ nutritional label. Nutrients from dietary supplements and from fortified foods consumed during the recall days were included in the calculated nutrient intake. The calculated average daily nutrient intake from the two recalls was compared to the recommended intake ranges for macronutrients and recommended daily intakes (RI) for micronutrients [18].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data from the questionnaire and background characteristics were manually entered into the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0. Data about the food and nutrient intakes estimated from KBS were transferred to SPSS. All data were further processed and analysed in SPSS. Energy intake information acquired during the telephone interviews (n = 12) did not differ from those who completed two face-to-face 24-h recalls and were therefore included in the analyses. Mothers who only completed one 24-h recall were also included. The weight and length of the children were converted into Z-scores for weight-for-age, height-for-age and weight-for-height according to 2006 WHO child growth standards [19] using WHO Anthro (version 3.2.2, January 2011, Geneva, Switzerland) and macros. Cow’s milk and yoghurt were categorized as ‘dairy products’ in the analysis. Infant formula and infant cereals were categorized as ‘iron-enriched products’. Iron intake was compared between infants receiving and not receiving dairy products and between infants receiving and not receiving iron-enriched products. The intake of dairy products and the intake of iron-enriched products were tested by different background characteristics. The intake of vitamin D was compared between infants receiving and not receiving vitamin D supplements. The intake of vitamin D supplements was tested by different background characteristics. The data did not adhere to a normal distribution, and continuous variables are presented as median and 25th and 75th percentiles (P25–P75) and were tested using a Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were tested using a Chi-square test.

3. Results

Selected characteristics of the infants and their parents are presented in Table 1. The Norwegian-Somali infants had significantly higher Z-scores for height-for-age (1.4 vs. 0.6, p = 0.001) but not for weight-for-height (0.7 vs. 0.2, p = 0.087) compared to the Norwegian-Iraqi infants. The Somali-born mothers were younger (29 years vs. 32 years, p = 0.026), had lived in Norway for a longer period of time (10 years vs. 7 years, p = 0.012) and a higher percentage were working at the time of interviewing (27% vs. 13%, p = 0.026) compared to the Iraqi-born mothers. A higher proportion of the Iraqi-born mothers had higher education compared to the Somali-born mothers (64% vs. 38%, p = 0.001).
Table 1

Characteristics of the infants and parents sampled (n = 166).

CharacteristicsTotal (n = 166) Somali Origin (n = 89) Iraqi Origin (n = 77) p-Value *
Infants
Boys/girls 55/45 60/40 49/51 0.154
Weight at 12 months (g) 10,000(9286–11,100)10,270(9779–11,811)9708(9093–10,575)0.001
Boys10,120(9470–11,293)10,350(9824–11,800)9940(8600–10,885)0.034
Girls9815(9175–10,960)10,185(9481–12,104)9460(9100–10,500)0.012
Length at 12 months (cm) 77.5(75.0–79.9)78.9(77.0–81.5)76.5(74.4–78.3)<0.001
Boys78.0(75.6–80.5)78.3(76.8–81.0)77.8(74.4–79.3)0.110
Girls77.0(75.0–79.0)79.5(76.5–82.8)76.0(74.1–77.4)<0.001
Z-score
Weight-for-age0.5(0.0–1.5)0.9(0.2–1.9)0.4(0.0–1.1)0.020
Height-for-age0.8(0.8–1.7)1.4(0.4–2.4)0.6(0.0–1.1)0.001
Weight-for-height0.3(−0.4–1.2)0.7(−0.4–1.5)0.2(−0.4–0.9)0.087
Mothers
Age (years) 30.0(27.0–34.0)29.0(27.0–33.0)32.0(27.0–36.5)0.026
Age when immigrated to Norway 22.0(15.0–26.3)20.0(12.0–24.0)23.0(19.0–29.0)0.001
Number of years lived in Norway 10.0(5.0–14.0)10.0(5.0–15.0)7.0(3.0–13.0)0.012
Education
No/basic education50 62 36 0.001
High school/higher education50 38 64
Current employment status
Not working79 73 87 0.026
Working (full-time/part-time)21 27 13
Primiparous 28 28 27 0.891
Fathers
Origin
Somalia/Iraq92 95 88 0.102
Other8 5 12
Education
No/basic education28 29 27 0.285
High school/higher education63 59 68
Do not know9 12 5
Responsible for child during daytime 0.021
Mother58 48 68
Others (e.g., partner, day-care, etc.)19 21 17
Mother and others23 31 15

* Comparison of parents and infants of Somali and Iraqi origin. † Percentages for categorical variables, and medians (25th and 75th percentiles) for continuous variables; ‡ Data on gender are missing for three infants from Somalia. The lengths of 44 infants are missing (37 from Somalia and 7 from Iraq). The weights of 42 infants are missing (33 from Somalia and 9 from Iraq). Among male infants, data on length are missing for 26 infants and data on weight are missing for 26 infants. Among female infants, data on length are missing for 16 infants and data on weight are missing for 15 infants. The ages of four Somali-born mothers are missing. The ages when immigrated to Norway are missing for six Somali-born mothers and two Iraqi-born mothers. Mothers’ and fathers’ highest completed education is missing for four mothers and five fathers from Somalia. Current work status is missing for one Somali-born mother and one Iraqi-born mother. Primiparous data and father’s origin is missing for four Somali-born mothers. Who is responsible for the child during daytime is missing for one Norwegian-Iraqi infant. These are not included in the analysis.

3.1. Breastfeeding

At 12 months of age, 40% of the Norwegian-Somali infants and 47% of the Norwegian-Iraqi infants were breastfed (p = 0.414). The median breastfeeding frequency among those breastfeeding was 4.5 times a day in both groups.

3.2. Food Intake

Data from the 24-h recalls on daily intakes of various types of foods and drinks among all infants are presented in Table 2. Percentages of and intake among consumers are presented in Table 3. Norwegian-Somali infants had significantly higher median daily intakes of commercial infant cereals, commercial fruit purees, fish/fish products, yoghurt and cow’s milk compared to the Norwegian-Iraqi infants (Table 2). Norwegian-Iraqi infants, on the other hand, had significantly higher daily intakes of refined flour bread, cake, meat and meat products, eggs, fruits and berries, added sugar, tea and water than Norwegian-Somali infants (Table 2).
Table 2

Median intake of foods and drinks (g/day) among all infants at 12 months of age.

Total (n = 166)Somali Origin (n = 89)Iraqi Origin (n = 77)p-Value *
Median(P25, P75)Median(P25, P75)Median(P25, P75)
Infant foods
 Breastmilk0(0, 372)0(0, 310)0(0, 454)0.139
 Infant formula0(0, 190)0(0, 103)0(0, 275)0.092
 Commercial infant cereal 125(0, 275)200(102, 300)58(0, 150)<0.001
 Commercial infant dinners0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.762
 Commercial fruit puree0(0, 3)0(0, 45)0(0, 0)0.004
 Commercial baby drinks0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.884
Bread17(4, 31)18(0, 31)16(6, 31)0.281
 100% sifted flour0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 4)0.001
 <50% wholemeal flour0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 8)<0.001
 >50% wholemeal flour4(0, 21)9(0, 30)0(0, 16)0.055
Grain products13(4, 30)11(2, 30)14(6, 29)0.268
Cake0(0, 7)0(0, 0)6(0, 15)<0.001
Potatoes13(0, 26)16(6, 26)10(0, 27)0.090
Vegetables37(22, 66)41(26, 67)33(16, 64)0.239
Meat/meat products17(0, 35)5(0, 23)24(11, 49)<0.001
Fish/fish products0(0, 17)9(0, 21)0(0, 0)<0.001
Eggs0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 22)<0.001
Fruit and berries43(7, 90)36(0, 58)58(22, 121)<0.001
Yoghurt41(0, 94)57(0, 110)25(0, 63)0.009
Cheese2(0, 12)1(0, 11)3(0, 13)0.512
Margarine, butter and oils4(2, 8)4(2, 8)4(2, 8)0.602
Added sugar0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 2)0.045
Drinks
 Cow’s milk60(0, 320)188(0, 344)26(0, 245)0.025
  Whole milk0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.623
  Partly skimmed milk31(0, 250)110(0, 313)3(0, 185)0.013
  Skimmed milk0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.127
 Nido0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.127
 Juice0(0, 30)0(0, 30)0(0, 30)0.187
 Soda/squash with sugar0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.872
 Soda/squash, light0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.397
 Tea0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0(0, 0)0.028
 Water180(120, 270)160(98, 248)187(126, 299)0.041

* Comparison of the intake of foods and drinks among infants of Somali and Iraqi origin, Mann–Whitney U test; † Prepared with water, infant formula, Nido and/or cow’s milk.

Table 3

Percentage of consumers and median intake of foods and drinks (g/day) among consumers at 12 months of age.

Total (n = 166)Somali Origin (n = 89)Iraqi Origin (n = 77)p-Value *
% ConsumersMedian(P25–P75)% ConsumersMedian(P25–P75)% ConsumersMedian(P25–P75)
Infant foods
 Breastmilk43434(310–497)40372(248–455)47474(326–497)0.414
 Infant formula31330(217–540)26291(192–492)36385(240–649)0.143
 Commercial infant cereal 74200(109–300)88214(125–305)57140(75–298)<0.001
 Commercial infant dinners1395(44–148)1495(42–134)1298(45–173)0.729
 Commercial fruit puree2550(45–98)3450(45–100)1445(45–90)0.004
 Commercial baby drinks240(26–88)240(–)363(–)0.883
Bread7923(11–35)7025(16–36)9017(8–33)0.002
 100% sifted flour1812(5–17)825(13–38)3010(4–15)<0.001
 <50% wholemeal flour2416(6–23)1219(8–23)3613(5–25)<0.001
 >50% wholemeal flour5221(11–33)5725(15–33)4617(8–33)0.128
Grain products8418(9–32)7518(9–39)9117(8–31)0.020
Cake3717(6–19)1611(5–14)6214(6–19)<0.001
Potatoes7120(12–34)8218(11–28)5822(13–37)0.001
Vegetables9538(25–68)9443(27–69)9634(18–67)0.605
Meat/meat products7224(13–46)6021(8–31)8632(16–51)<0.001
Fish/fish products4618(11–37)6516(10–31)2329(16–43)<0.001
Eggs2128(13–45)1110(4–34)3328(22–45)0.001
Fruit and berries8055(31–101)6454(38–88)9959(25–123)<0.001
Yoghurt7063(36–107)7095(50–112)7046(20–75)0.948
Cheese5310(4–20)5210(4–18)5511(4–21)0.713
Margarine, butter and oils954(2–8)944(2–8)965(2–8)0.605
Added sugar224(1–8)172(1–9)294(2–7)0.070
Drinks
 Cow’s milk68248 (60–420)71286(152–440)64121(29–404)0.327
  Whole milk17173(23–250)15245(179–392)2028(15–170)0.403
  Partly skimmed milk58215(60–368)65239(117–365)51180(32–375)0.058
  Skimmed milk111(-)0-(-)311(-)0.126
 Nido3156(68–537)1156(-)5169(49–689)0.126
 Juice4531(19–93)3853(29–105)5230(13–91)0.076
 Soda/squash with sugar1631(15–100)1645(16–100)1731(14–105)0.841
 Soda/squash, light243(31–58)335(-)160(-)0.385
 Tea815(5–30)363(-)1313(4–23)0.021
 Water100180(120–270)100160(98–248)100187(126–299)-

* Comparison of the percentage of consumers among infants of Somali and Iraqi origin, Chi-square test; † Prepared with water, infant formula, Nido and/or cow’s milk.

Commercial infant cereals and fruit purees, potatoes and fish/fish products were consumed by a significantly higher proportion of Norwegian-Somali infants compared to Norwegian-Iraqi infants, while bread, grain products, cake, meat, eggs, fruit/berries and tea were more commonly consumed by Norwegian-Iraqi infants (Table 3).

3.3. Energy and Nutrient Intake

The average energy and nutrient intake from the 24-h recalls are shown in Table 4. The median energy intake among Norwegian-Somali infants was 3791 kJ compared to 4122 kJ among Norwegian-Iraqi infants (p = 0.059). The median energy percentages (E%) from protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the recommended intake ranges in both groups; however, the intake of saturated fats was above the recommended upper level of 10 E%. The intake of added sugar, on the other hand, was below 5 E% in both groups.
Table 4

Average energy and nutrient intake among infants of Somali and Iraqi origin at 12 months of age.

RI (1–2 Years)Total (n = 166)Somali Origin (n = 89)Iraqi Origin (n = 77)p-Value *
Median(P25–P75)Median(P25–P75)Median(P25–P75)
Energy intake (kJ) 3945(3235–4562)3791(2989–4544)4122(3454–4751)0.059
Protein (E%)10–1514.5(12.3–17.0)14.8(12.8–17.6)13.8(11.7–16.2)0.074
Total fat (E%)30–4035.0(30.0–39.3)33.8(29.9–37.6)36.5(32.5–40.9)0.004
 Saturated fat<1012.1(10.1–14.7)11.7(9.7–13.7)12.7(11.1–15.6)0.001
 Monounsaturated fatty acids 12.6(10.3–14.5)11.8(9.4–13.9)13.4(11.3–15.0)0.002
 Polyunsaturated fatty acids 5.7(4.8–6.8)5.3(4.4–6.5)6.1(5.3–7.3)0.003
Total carbohydrates (E%)45–6048.5(44.8–51.9)49.5(46.8–51.9)47.2(42.9–52.1)0.048
 Added sugars<103.2(1.3–5.9)4.0(1.5–6.1)2.5(1.3–5.0)0.063
Fibre (g) 7.4(5.4–10.3)7.4(5.3–10.2)7.4(5.5–10.9)0.753
Vitamin A (μg)300 (RAE)666(483–878)717(574–933)561(400–874)0.011
Vitamin D (μg)1012.6(8.6–17.4)13.9(10.2–17.7)11.7(7.2–17.0)0.029
Vitamin E (mg)4 (μ-TE) 10.5(5.3–14.6)12.1(8.5–15.4)7.3(4.6–12.3)<0.001
Thiamine (mg)0.50.61(0.42–0.80)0.62(0.42–0.80)0.60(0.41–0.80)0.864
Riboflavin (mg)0.60.72(0.44–1.00)0.77(0.48–1.08)0.66(0.44–0.86)0.039
Niacin (mg)7 (NE) 6.3(4.4–8.6)6.1(4.5–8.3)6.5(4.4–8.7)0.593
B6 (mg)0.50.56(0.39–0.75)0.50(0.37–0.73)0.60(0.44–0.82)0.033
Folate (μg)6095(72–135)85(66–121)108(80–151)0.002
B12 (μg)0.61.8(0.8–2.9)2.1(1.1–3.0)1.3(0.6–2.6)0.022
Vitamin C (mg)2572(46–113)74(45–110)69(48–121)0.755
Calcium (mg)600727(519–954)777(587–984)633(480–938)0.017
Iron (mg)87.1(4.6–10.3)7.3(4.9–10.3)6.7(4.5–11.4)0.523
Zinc (mg)55.1(3.9–6.4)4.8(3.9–6.0)5.3(4.0–6.9)0.117

* Comparison of infants of Somali and Iraqi origin, Mann–Whitney U test; † RI = Recommended intake ranges for macronutrients and recommended daily intakes for micronutrients. ‡ TE = tocopherol equivalent, NE = niacin equivalent.

The main sources of saturated fat intake in the total diet of the Norwegian-Somali infants were cow’s milk (which contributed with 22%), breast milk (22%), commercial infant cereals (9%) and cheese (8%) (data not shown). The main sources of saturated fats among the Norwegian-Iraqi infants were breast milk (23%), meat and meat products (11%), cow’s milk (9%) and cheese (9%). Yoghurt was the main source of the added sugar intake among both the Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants (38% vs. 23%). The median intake of all micronutrients, except iron and niacin in both groups and zinc among Norwegian-Somali infants were above the RI.

3.4. Factors Associated with Iron Intake

The main sources of dietary iron were commercial infant cereals (which contributed with 51% among Norwegian-Somali vs. 34% among Norwegian-Iraqi infants), iron supplements (13% vs. 9%), infant formula (10% vs. 19%) and bread and other grain products (10% vs. 8%). During the recall days, 6% of the Norwegian-Somali infants and 8% of the Norwegian-Iraqi infants received supplements containing iron (p = 0.574, data not shown). Table 5 shows the percentage of the infants receiving dairy products and iron-enriched products and also median intakes of iron among infants receiving dairy products and iron-enriched products. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the proportion who had received dairy products, whether it concerned any dairy products or more than 500 g dairy products per day. A higher proportion of Norwegian-Somali infants had received iron-enriched products compared to Norwegian-Iraqi infants (88% vs. 73%, respectively; p = 0.015). Intakes of iron did not differ significantly between infants receiving dairy products compared to infants not receiving dairy products. However, the median intake of iron was significantly higher among infants receiving iron-enriched products (8.1 mg/day) compared to infants not receiving iron-enriched products (3.7 mg/day; p < 0.001). Neither intake of dairy products nor intake of iron-enriched products differed significantly between genders, according to mothers’ ages, number of years lived in Norway, education level, current work status or number of children.
Table 5

Percentage of Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants receiving dairy products and iron-enriched products and median iron intake (mg/day) among infants receiving dairy products and iron-enriched products.

TotalSomali OriginIraqi Originp-Value Iron mg/Dayp-Value
(n = 166)(n = 89)(n= 77)Median(P25–P75)
Dairy products
No (n = 21)139160.1999.4(5.2–11.1)0.327
Yes (n = 145)8791847.0(4.5–10.2)
Dairy products
≤500 g/day (n = 140)8480900.0827.2(4.8–10.7)0.170
>500 g/day (n = 26)1620106.4(4.2–8.9)
Iron–enriched products *
No (n = 32)1912270.0153.7(2.6–5.5)<0.001
Yes (n = 145)8188738.1(5.7–11.2)

* Include infant formula and infant cereals; † Tested by Chi-square test; ‡ Tested by Mann–Whitney U test.

3.5. Factors Associated with Vitamin D Intake

Vitamin D supplements comprised more than half of the vitamin D intake in both groups (61% among Norwegian-Somali infants vs. 52% among Norwegian-Iraqi infants). Other sources of vitamin D were commercial infant cereals (19% in both groups), infant formula (7% vs. 17%) and fish and fish products (6% vs. 3%) among Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants, respectively. During the recall days, a total of 84% of the infants had received vitamin D supplements. Significantly more among the Norwegian-Somali infants compared to the Norwegian-Iraqi infants had received vitamin D supplements during the recall days (94% vs. 71%, respectively; p < 0.001) The median (P25–P75) intake of vitamin D among those receiving vitamin D supplements was 14.5 (10.8–18.1) μg/day compared to 4.1 (1.5–7.6) μg/day among those not receiving vitamin D supplements (p < 0.001). The intake of vitamin D supplements did not differ significantly between genders, according to mothers’ ages, number of years lived in Norway, education level, current work status or number of children.

4. Discussion

The present paper describes the food and nutrient intake in a group of 12-month-old Norwegian infants of mothers who immigrated to Norway from Somalia and Iraq. The findings indicate that the nutrient intake in this group of infants in general seems to be in accordance with Norwegian dietary recommendations, with the possible exception of certain micronutrients. The intake of added sugar was low, whereas the median intake of saturated fats exceeded the recommendations.

4.1. Breastfeeding

In this group of infants with immigrant backgrounds, 40% of the Norwegian-Somali infants and 47% of the Norwegian-Iraqi infants were breastfed at 12 months of age, with a median frequency of 4.5 times a day. This is quite similar to the 46% found to be breastfed in the Norwegian national dietary survey of infants at 12 months of age who had an average breastfeeding frequency of 3.5 times a day [4]. Breastfeeding patterns have been shown to vary between ethnic subgroups in a society, but also to depend on country of residence [20,21,22]. Data from a nationally representative population based cohort study from Ireland [21] and the National Survey of Children’s Health in the US [22] reported higher breastfeeding initiation and longer duration among immigrant mothers compared to the native mothers. However, the breastfeeding prevalence in Ireland and the US were in general lower than what is common in Norway and other Scandinavian countries [23]. This may explain the opposite findings and the greater differences between immigrant and native mothers compared to our findings.

4.2. Food Intake

Commercial infant cereals, bread, potatoes and vegetables, fruit and berries, meat/meat products and fish/fish products were the most commonly consumed foods among the Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants. These foods were also consumed by a high proportion of infants in the Norwegian national dietary survey [4]. Commercial infant dinners were consumed by a higher proportion of infants in the national dietary survey compared to infants in the present survey [4]. Homemade dinners were also more common than commercial infant dinners at 6 months of age among Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants [13]. The lower use of commercial infant dinners among the children with immigrant background may be due, as reported in a study of Somali mothers in the US, to concerns about the lack of freshness of commercially produced baby foods and also the practice of feeding children the same foods as adults [24]. One important consideration when comparing these results is that the Norwegian national dietary survey used a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess the infants’ dietary intake at 12 months of age [4], while the present study used repeated 24-h recalls due to limited knowledge about Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants’ diets. Thus, any comparison between the two studies should be undertaken with caution because the results from the national dietary survey represent the infants’ intake over a longer period of time.

4.3. Energy and Nutrient Intake

The energy intake among both Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants was lower than the mean intake of 5100 kJ reported in the national dietary survey, which only reported the energy and nutrient intake of non-breastfed infants [4]. The average daily energy requirement for boys and girls at 12 months of age is 337 kJ/kg and 333 kJ/kg, respectively, according to Nordic nutrition recommendations [25]. Based on the median weights of the infants in the sample, Norwegian-Somali infants would have an average daily energy requirement of 3440 kJ and Norwegian-Iraqi infants would have an average daily energy requirement of 3252 kJ, which is lower than the average energy intake found in this study. However, the quality of the data on weight and height may have some limitations as each child health clinic may differ in terms of accuracy in reporting the measurements and the measurements may have been taken a few weeks before or after the 24-h recalls were performed. In addition, the weights of several infants were not registered, which may also have affected the median weights reported in this study. Furthermore, breast milk amounts were only estimated and this, along with possible misreporting of dietary intakes, may give inaccurate energy intake data. The median E% of protein, total fat and carbohydrates were all within the recommended intake ranges [18]. Saturated fat was above the recommended 10 E%. However, one of the major sources of saturated fats in the diet was breast milk, which is recommended to give to infants until 12 months of age and beyond [18]. Other main sources of saturated fats was cow’s milk and meat and meat products. Parents could reduce the infants’ intake of saturated fats by changing high-fat dairy products with low-fat products as well as using lean cuts of meat. The intake of added sugar was appreciably lower than the recommended upper level of 10 E%, which is a positive finding. These results are quite similar to those reported in the national dietary survey, where saturated fats accounted for 12 E% and added sugar only accounted for 4 E%. Previous studies of young children with immigrant backgrounds in Norway and other countries have suggested that high sugar and sweetened beverage intake could be prevalent in this group [9,26,27,28]. However, the studies from Norway were conducted several years ago, and it could be that the trend of reducing the intake of added sugar, which has been reflected in the national dietary surveys, is also the case for this group of children. In the national dietary surveys, the intake of added sugar decreased from 10 E% in 1999 to 4 E% in 2007 due to the reduced intake of sugary drinks among Norwegian infants and the reduced levels of added sugar in commercial infant products [4,29]. In addition, a qualitative survey among Somali-born mothers in Norway revealed that most mothers thought that their infants at 12 months were too young to be given sugar [30]. However, the older siblings were usually eating candy and the majority of mothers had sweets available at home at all times, which may indicate that sweets and sugary drinks may be introduced at a later stage in the child’s life.

4.4. Factors Associated with Iron Intake

Iron deficiency has been reported to be prevalent among both immigrant and non-immigrant children in Europe [7,31,32], however, some studies have suggested a higher prevalence among immigrant children [7,32]. The consumption of milk with low iron content and the excessive consumption of cow’s milk have been reported in the literature to be factors that may cause iron deficiency [32,33]. On the other hand, iron-enriched products may be a protective factor against inadequate iron intake [32]. In the present study, we found no significant differences in iron intake among infants who consumed dairy products compared to those who did not consume dairy products. There were no significant differences among those who consumed more than 500 g/day of dairy products compared to those who consumed less. Still, high consumption of cow’s milk is not recommended as it may inhibit the iron absorption [34]. Higher iron intakes were observed among infants who received iron-enriched products compared to those who did not receive these products. This has also been found among one-year-old children in other studies [12,35]. The majority of infants in the present study received iron-enriched products; however, the median intake of iron was lower than the RI [18] and the intake reported in the national dietary survey (12.8 mg/day) [4] for both Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants. The higher intakes of iron among the infants in the national dietary survey may be explained by a lower consumption of cow’s milk (92 g/day), with only 51% consumers, and a higher consumption of commercial infant cereals (293 g/day) and infant formula (144 g/day), with 82% and 40% consumers, respectively [4]. Commercial infant cereals and infant formula were the two major sources of iron in the diet of the infants in the national dietary survey, followed by bread and meat/meat products [4].

4.5. Factors Associated with Vitamin D Intake

The intake of vitamin D exceeded the recommended levels for both Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants. Severe vitamin D deficiency has been reported to be prevalent among 6-week-old infants of immigrant backgrounds in Norway who did not receive vitamin D supplements [8]. In the present study, vitamin D supplements were given to the majority of Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants, as was seen in the 6-month survey [13]. The proportion was lower among the Norwegian-Iraqi infants. Vitamin D supplements were more commonly given in this sample compared to the 67% reported in the national dietary survey; those infants also had lower average intake of vitamin D (6.8 μg/day) [4]. Those not receiving vitamin D supplements in the present survey were more likely to have much lower intakes of vitamin D than those receiving vitamin D supplements and also lower intakes than the RI of 10 μg/day [18]. Vitamin D supplementation has recently been reported by Moffat et al. [36] to be almost similar and high among both immigrants and Canadian-born mothers, although less so for refugee mothers. According to their findings, current public education on vitamin D supplementation delivered by nurses and other health educators seems to be similarly effective for Canadian and immigrant parents [36]. A study by Madar et al. showed significant improvement in vitamin D status among infants with immigrant backgrounds in Norway after receiving free vitamin D supply together with tailor-made information handouts [37]. Vitamin D supplements are provided for free to of non-Western immigrant backgrounds at child health centres in Norway due to concerns about inadequate vitamin D intakes in this group. [38]. The findings of this study suggest that this information may have reached the majority of the participating mothers.

4.6. Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Two very specific subgroups of the Norwegian population were chosen for the study, which is an important strength of the survey. According to lists from the National Population Register, the participating Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants accounted for approximately 19% and 27%, respectively, of all Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants who turned 12 months old during the recruitment period in the three Norwegian counties included. Recruitment challenges are widely reported in studies among immigrant populations [39], and was also observed in the present study. The advantage was the use of bilingual field workers, which enabled the recruitment of mothers with limited Norwegian language skills. A possible limitation is the relatively large number of mothers lost to follow-up at 12 months, although new mothers were recruited. However, a comparison of background characteristics from the 6-month survey [13] and a description of the two immigrant groups by Statistics Norway [40] suggest that the mothers are to some extent representative of Somali-born and Iraqi-born mothers in these three counties in Norway. In general, the dietary assessment of infants can be complicated by the fact that dietary habits change rapidly in infancy. A review by Burrows et al. has indicated that weighed food records may provide the best dietary estimates for younger children from 0.5 to 4 years old [41]. However, the 24-h multiple-pass recall is less time consuming and is reportedly used more frequently among immigrant populations, along with FFQs [39,42]. The recalls were mainly performed face-to-face, which may be a benefit as potential misunderstandings can be easily clarified in a personal interview. On the other hand, the presence of a field worker may cause a perception of authority on the part of the mothers, which could lead to social desirability response bias [43]. Although the macronutrient composition may reflect the true dietary practices of the two immigrant groups, reporting errors such as underreporting or overreporting may contribute to apparently low or high intakes of certain foods [41]. For infants in particular, not all foods served are necessarily consumed as some is wasted. Furthermore, the mothers may share the responsibility for their children with other adults (e.g., partners, grandparents and day-care), and it may be more difficult for the mothers to assess children’s intake during the hours they were not present [44]. In addition, biochemical indicators of iron and vitamin D status were not measured in the present study, which is necessary in order to assess the infantsiron and vitamin D status.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study indicate that the food and nutrient intake of Norwegian-Somali and Norwegian-Iraqi infants in general seems to be in accordance with the Norwegian dietary recommendations. The intake of dairy products was generally higher among Norwegian-Somali infants compared to Norwegian-Iraqi infants, but dairy product intake did not seem to affect iron intake. Iron-enriched products and vitamin D supplements were important sources of the infantsiron and vitamin D intake. Vitamin D supplements and foods rich in iron should continue to be promoted. Infants with immigrant backgrounds are excluded from the Norwegian national dietary surveys, and the present study contributes with information about food and nutrient intake among two of these groups living in Norway. More research to investigate infant feeding practices among immigrant groups in Norway is needed.
  28 in total

1.  Consumption of cow's milk as a cause of iron deficiency in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Ekhard E Ziegler
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Nativity/immigrant status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic determinants of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States, 2003.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh; Michael D Kogan; Deborah L Dee
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Nutrition in early life: a global priority.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Racial/ethnic and immigrant differences in early childhood diet quality.

Authors:  Marieke L A de Hoog; Ken P Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Manon van Eijsden; Elsie M Taveras
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 5.  How dietary intake methodology is adapted for use in European immigrant population groups - a review.

Authors:  Joy Ngo; Mirjana Gurinovic; Lene Frost-Andersen; Lluís Serra-Majem
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  The influence of ethnicity on breastfeeding rates in Ireland: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Emma L Ladewig; Catherine Hayes; John Browne; Richard Layte; Udo Reulbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Factors influencing iron nutrition among one-year-old healthy children in Sweden.

Authors:  Ann-Cathrine Bramhagen; Johan Svahn; Inger Hallström; Irene Axelsson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  Iron status of one-year-olds and association with breast milk, cow's milk or formula in late infancy.

Authors:  Asa V Thorisdottir; Alfons Ramel; Gestur I Palsson; Helgi Tomassson; Inga Thorsdottir
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.614

9.  Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.

Authors:  J R Hebert; L Clemow; L Pbert; I S Ockene; J K Ockene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Ethnic differences in dietary intake at age 12 and 18 months: the Born in Bradford 1000 Study.

Authors:  Pinki Sahota; Lisa A Gatenby; Darren C Greenwood; Maria Bryant; Sian Robinson; John Wright
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.022

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nutritional rickets in Norway: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Haakon E Meyer; Kristina Skram; Ingvill Almås Berge; Ahmed A Madar; Hilde Johanne Bjørndalen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  A Scoping Review of the Health of African Immigrant and Refugee Children.

Authors:  Bukola Salami; Higinio Fernandez-Sanchez; Christa Fouche; Catrin Evans; Lindiwe Sibeko; Mia Tulli; Ashley Bulaong; Stephen Owusu Kwankye; Mary Ani-Amponsah; Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika; Hayat Gommaa; Kafuli Agbemenu; Chizoma Millicent Ndikom; Solina Richter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.