| Literature DB >> 27689405 |
María Del Mar Valenzuela-Membrives1, Francisco Perea-García2, Abel Sanchez-Palencia3, Francisco Ruiz-Cabello2, Mercedes Gómez-Morales4, María Teresa Miranda-León5, Inmaculada Galindo-Angel4, María Esther Fárez-Vidal6.
Abstract
Immune cell infiltration is a common feature of many human solid tumors. Innate and adaptative immune systems contribute to tumor immunosurveillance. We investigated whether tumors evade immune surveillance by inducing states of tolerance and/or through the inability of some immune subpopulations to effectively penetrate tumor nests. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry analysis were used to study the composition and distribution of immune subpopulations in samples of peripheral blood, tumor tissue (TT), adjacent tumor tissue (ATT), distant non-tumor tissue (DNTT), cancer nests, cancer stroma, and invasive margin in 61 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A significantly higher percentage of T and B cells and significantly lower percentage of NK cells were detected in TT than in DNTT. Memory T cells (CD4+CD45RO+, CD8+CD45RO+) and activated T cells (CD8+DR+) were more prevalent in TT. Alongside this immune activation, the percentage of T cells with immunosuppressive activity was higher in TT than in DNTT. B- cells were practically non-existent in tumor nests and were preferentially located in the invasive margin. The dominant NK cell phenotype in peripheral blood and DNTT was the cytotoxic phenotype (CD56+ CD16+), while the presence of these cells was significantly decreased in ATT and further decreased in TT. Finally, the immunologic response differed between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and according to the tumor differentiation grade. These findings on the infiltration of innate and adaptative immune cells into tumors contribute to a more complete picture of the immune reaction in NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: flow cytometry; immunohistochemistry; immunological response; lung cancer; lymphocyte subsets
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27689405 PMCID: PMC5342105 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Analysis of immune cell density in tumor (TT), adjacent tumor (ATT), and distant non-tumor tissue (DNTT) samples from each patient
Upper horizontal line of box plot, 75th percentile; lower horizontal line of box, 25th percentile; horizontal bar within box, median value (in %) of each subpopulation analyzed; upper horizontal bar outside box, 90th percentile; lower horizontal bar outside box, 10th percentile. Circles represent outliers.
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry results
(A) Intensity of the immunohistochemical staining of T lymphocytes (including memory T cells), B-lymphocytes and CD 68 (macrophages) in the invasive margin (IM), stromal and within cancer nests (CN) for samples analyzed. Severe (score of 4), Moderate (score of 3), Mild (score of 2), Minimal (score of 1).
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry results
The infiltration of lymphocytes was more intense in invasive margin and stroma surrounding tumor nests. (A) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of tissue; magnification X4 followed by computer magnification. (B) B lymphocyte (CD20) staining in stroma; magnification X20 followed by computer magnification. (C) CD8+ staining in stroma and invasive margins; magnification X10 followed by computer magnification. (D) CD45+ staining in stroma and invasive margins; magnification X10 followed by computer magnification.
Demographic, clinical, and histological characteristics of the study subjects
| Variable | NSCLC | Healthy subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 11 (18) | 13 (40.6) |
| Male | 50 (82) | 19 (59.4) |
| Age,years, median (range) | 66 (45–82) | 62 (49–84) |
| Smoking history: | ||
| Non-smoker | 3 (5) | 16 (50) |
| Ex-smoker | 28 (46) | 5 (15.6) |
| Smoker | 30 (49) | 15 (34.4) |
| Smoking pack-years, median (range) | 55 (0–120) | 7,78 (0–40) |
| Tumor size, median (range) | 3.80 (0.5–9.5) | |
| Histological NSCLC subtype: | ||
| Lung Adenocarcinoma | 23 (36.1) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 32 (53,9) | |
| Metastasis from other cancer | 6 (10) | |
| NSCLC stage: | ||
| Stage IA | 21 (36) | |
| Stage IB | 18 (28) | |
| Stage IIA | 13 (21.3) | |
| Stage IIB | 7 (11.5) | |
| Stage IIIA | 2 (3.3) | |
| T status: | ||
| T1a | 13 (20) | |
| T1b | 10 (16) | |
| T2a | 18 (29.5) | |
| T2b | 11 (19) | |
| T3 | 8 (13.9) | |
| T4 | 1 (1.6) | |
| N status: | ||
| Nx | 4 (6.6) | |
| N0 | 45 (73.8) | |
| N1 | 6 (9.8) | |
| N2 | 6 (9.8) | |
| Differentiation: | ||
| Moderate | 27 (43) | |
| Good | 11 (17.4) | |
| Poor | 15 (24.6) | |
| SUVs PET, median (range) | 9.52 (0–26.2) |