Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have both been associated with occipital lobe hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET, whereas relative sparing of posterior cingulate metabolism compared with precuneus/cuneus (i.e., cingulate island sign) is a feature of DLB. We aimed to determine whether patterns of hypometabolism or the cingulate island sign differed between PCA and DLB. Methods: Sixteen clinically diagnosed PCA and 13 probable DLB subjects underwent 18F-FDG PET. All PCA subjects showed β-amyloid deposition on PET scanning. Regional hypometabolism was assessed compared with a control cohort (n = 29) using voxel- and region-level analyses in statistical parametric mapping. A ratio of metabolism in the posterior cingulate to precuneus plus cuneus was calculated to assess the cingulate island sign. In addition, the 18F-FDG PET scans were visually assessed to determine whether the cingulate island sign was present in each subject. Results: PCA and DLB showed overlapping patterns of hypometabolism involving the lateral occipital lobe, lingual gyrus, cuneus, precuneus, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, striatum, and thalamus. However, DLB showed greater hypometabolism in the medial occipital lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior temporal lobe, and caudate nucleus than PCA, and PCA showed more asymmetric patterns of hypometabolism than DLB. The cingulate island sign was present in both DLB and PCA, although it was more asymmetric in PCA. Conclusion: Regional hypometabolism overlaps to a large degree between PCA and DLB, although the degree of involvement of the frontal and anterior temporal lobes and the presence of asymmetry could be useful in differential diagnosis.
Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have both been associated with occipital lobe hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET, whereas relative sparing of posterior cingulate metabolism compared with precuneus/cuneus (i.e., cingulate island sign) is a feature of DLB. We aimed to determine whether patterns of hypometabolism or the cingulate island sign differed between PCA and DLB. Methods: Sixteen clinically diagnosed PCA and 13 probable DLB subjects underwent 18F-FDG PET. All PCA subjects showed β-amyloid deposition on PET scanning. Regional hypometabolism was assessed compared with a control cohort (n = 29) using voxel- and region-level analyses in statistical parametric mapping. A ratio of metabolism in the posterior cingulate to precuneus plus cuneus was calculated to assess the cingulate island sign. In addition, the 18F-FDG PET scans were visually assessed to determine whether the cingulate island sign was present in each subject. Results: PCA and DLB showed overlapping patterns of hypometabolism involving the lateral occipital lobe, lingual gyrus, cuneus, precuneus, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, striatum, and thalamus. However, DLB showed greater hypometabolism in the medial occipital lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior temporal lobe, and caudate nucleus than PCA, and PCA showed more asymmetric patterns of hypometabolism than DLB. The cingulate island sign was present in both DLB and PCA, although it was more asymmetric in PCA. Conclusion: Regional hypometabolism overlaps to a large degree between PCA and DLB, although the degree of involvement of the frontal and anterior temporal lobes and the presence of asymmetry could be useful in differential diagnosis.
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Stephen D Weigand; Maria M Shiung; Bradley F Boeve; Tanis J Ferman; Glenn E Smith; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Eduardo E Benarroch; Keith A Josephs; Clifford R Jack Journal: Brain Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Sid Gilman; Robert A Koeppe; Roderick Little; Hyonggin An; Larry Junck; Bruno Giordani; Carol Persad; Mary Heumann; Kris Wernette Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: M H Rosenbloom; A Alkalay; N Agarwal; S L Baker; J P O'Neil; M Janabi; I V Yen; M Growdon; J Jang; C Madison; E C Mormino; H J Rosen; M L Gorno-Tempini; M W Weiner; B L Miller; W J Jagust; G D Rabinovici Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Robert Perneczky; Alexander Drzezga; Henning Boecker; Hans Förstl; Alexander Kurz; Peter Häussermann Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Natalie S Ryan; Timothy J Shakespeare; Manja Lehmann; Shiva Keihaninejad; Jennifer M Nicholas; Kelvin K Leung; Nick C Fox; Sebastian J Crutch Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Mary Machulda; Matthew L Senjem; Christopher G Schwarz; Anthony J Spychalla; David T Jones; Daniel A Drubach; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner; Ronald C Petersen; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Samuel Boes; Hugo Botha; Mary Machulda; Val Lowe; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jennifer L Whitwell; Rene L Utianski; Joseph R Duffy; Keith A Josephs Journal: Neurocase Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 0.881
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Mary M Machulda; Matthew L Senjem; Anthony J Spychalla; Prashanthi Vemuri; David T Jones; Daniel A Drubach; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner; Ronald C Petersen; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Katerina A Tetzloff; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Peter R Martin; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Mary M Machulda; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Matthew L Senjem; Christopher G Schwarz; Anthony J Spychalla; Daniel A Drubach; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Jonathan Graff-Radford; Keir X X Yong; Liana G Apostolova; Femke H Bouwman; Maria Carrillo; Bradford C Dickerson; Gil D Rabinovici; Jonathan M Schott; David T Jones; Melissa E Murray Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 44.182