Literature DB >> 27688212

Patient Adherence and Experience with Extended Use of Prophylactic Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Following Pancreas and Liver Resection.

Madeline Lemke1,2, Kaitlyn Beyfuss1, Julie Hallet2, Natalie G Coburn1,2, Calvin H L Law1,2, Paul J Karanicolas3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend 28 days venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) following major abdominal surgery for cancer. Overall adherence with these recommendations is poor, but little is known about feasibility and tolerability from a patient perspective.
METHODS: An institution-wide policy for routine administration of 28 days of post-operative LMWH following major hepatic or pancreatic resection for cancer was implemented in April 2013. Patients having surgery from July 2013 to June 2015 were approached to participate in an interview examining adherence and experience with extended duration LMWH.
RESULTS: There were 100 patients included, with 81.4 % reporting perfect adherence with the regimen. The most frequent reasons for non-adherence were that a healthcare provider stopped the regimen or because of poor experience with injections. Most patients were able to correctly recall the reason for being prescribed LMWH (82.6 %), and 78.4 % of patients performed all injections themselves. Over half the patients (55.7 %) did not find the injections bothersome.
CONCLUSION: Patients reported high adherence and a manageable experience with post-operative extended-duration LMWH in an ambulatory setting following liver or pancreas resection. These findings suggest that patient adherence is not a major contributor to poor compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatopancreatobiliary; Low-molecular-weight heparin; Patient adherence; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27688212     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3274-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline compliance: a pilot study of augmented medication charts.

Authors:  R Cunningham; A Murray; J S Byrne; L Hammond; M Barry; D Mehigan; S Sheehan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Direct medical costs attributable to venous thromboembolism among persons hospitalized for major operation: a population-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Kevin P Cohoon; Cynthia L Leibson; Jeanine E Ransom; Aneel A Ashrani; Myung S Park; Tanya M Petterson; Kirsten Hall Long; Kent R Bailey; John A Heit
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Readmission rates due to venous thromboembolism in cancer patients after abdominopelvic surgery, a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Christine Klimowicz White; Jessica Langholtz; Zackory T Burns; Susan Kruse; Kimberly Sallee; David H Henry
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Venous thromboembolism and cancer risk among elderly adults in the United States.

Authors:  Morgan A Marks; Eric A Engels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Defining incidence and risk factors of venous thromboemolism after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Donald L Lucas; Brandyn Lau; Matthew Weiss; Fabian M Johnston; Marin Kheng; Marian Kheng; Kenzo Hirose; Christopher L Wolfgang; Elliott Haut; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Cancer and venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Anna Falanga; Andrea Piccioli
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Venous thromboembolism after hepatic resection: analysis of 5,706 patients.

Authors:  Ryan S Turley; Srinevas K Reddy; Cynthia K Shortell; Bryan M Clary; John E Scarborough
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Variation in Hospital Thromboprophylaxis Practices for Abdominal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Christopher P Scally; Sandra L Wong; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Kelsey Fegan; Joanne Todd; Peter K Henke; Darrell A Campbell; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after a hepatic resection: patterns of care among liver surgeons.

Authors:  Matthew J Weiss; Yuhree Kim; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Elliott R Haut; Kenzo Hirose; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Freesia Horsted; Joe West; Matthew J Grainge
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  7 in total

1.  Do Cost Limitations of Extended Prophylaxis After Surgery Apply to Ulcerative Colitis Patients?

Authors:  Ira L Leeds; Joseph K Canner; Sandra R DiBrito; Bashar Safar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Post-hepatectomy venous thromboembolism: a systematic review with meta-analysis exploring the role of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Monish Karunakaran; Ramneek Kaur; Simi Ismail; Sushma Cherukuru; Pavan Kumar Jonnada; Baiju Senadhipan; Savio George Barreto
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Comparison of Once-Daily Bemiparin with Twice-Daily Enoxaparin for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Igor A Suchkov; Javier Martinez-Gonzalez; Sebastian M Schellong; Toni Garbade; Michela Falciani
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines.

Authors:  Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Yuan Zhang; Francesca Brundisini; Ivan D Florez; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat; Housne Begum; Carlos A Cuello; Yetiani Roldan; Ru Chen; Chengyi Ding; Rebecca L Morgan; John J Riva; Yuqing Zhang; Rana Charide; Arnav Agarwal; Sara Balduzzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Yasir Rehman; Ignacio Neumann; Nicole Schwab; Tejan Baldeh; Cody Braun; María Francisca Rodríguez; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-10

5.  Dabigatran (Pradaxa) Is Safe for Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  M Farzan Rashid; Terri L Jackson; Jheanell A Morgan; Franklin A Dwyer; Beth A Schrope; John A Chabot; Michael D Kluger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Tinzaparin for Long-Term Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M José Martínez-Zapata; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Shaker A Mousa; Rupert Bauersachs
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after pancreatectomy for malignancy: Predicting risk based on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors.

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Ryan P Merkow; Anthony D Yang; David J Bentrem
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.454

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.